Patexia Logo
Patexia Logo
Products
  • IP Intelligence Reports
  • Patexia Concierge
  • Patent Analyzer
  • Trademarks Analyzer
  • Litigation Analyzer
  • All Products
Services
  • Lateral Opportunities
  • Expert Witness
  • Research Studies
  • Strategic Partnership
  • All Services
IP Community
  • IP Community
  • IP Webinars
  • In the News
Company
  • About Us
  • Press Release
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Login
JoinBook a Meeting
Patexia Logo
Products
  • IP Intelligence Reports
  • Patexia Concierge
  • Patent Analyzer
  • Trademarks Analyzer
  • Litigation Analyzer
Services
  • Lateral Opportunities
  • Expert Witness
  • Research Studies
  • Strategic Partnership
Company
  • About Us
  • Press Release
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Resources
  • IP Community
  • IP Webinars
  • In the News
  • Help Center
Contact
  • (310) 909-7611
  • 100 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 700
    Santa Monica, CA 90401 USA
  • info@patexia.com
  • Send a message
Follow Us
Terms and Conditions|Privacy Policy
© 2010-2023 Patexia Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Back to All Articles
Browse articles with tag: Inter Partes Reexamination
You must be logged in to create a new article
All Articles
Knobbe Martens
Apr 23, 2021
Does the Successor-in-Interest’s Shoe Fit?
MOJAVE DESERT HOLDINGS, LLC v. CROCS, INC. Before Newman, Dyk, and O’Malley.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.... Read More
Knobbe Martens
Feb 23, 2021
Inter Partes Reexam Can Trigger Issue Preclusion
SYNQOR, INC. v. VICOR CORPORATION Before Dyk, Clevenger, and Hughes.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A... Read More
Knobbe Martens
May 15, 2020
Unconstitutionally Appointed Patent Judges Cannot Decide Appeals From Inter Partes Reexaminations
Before O’Malley, Moore, and Chen.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. VIRNETX INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (Denying... Read More
Knobbe Martens
Aug 3, 2019
•
Featured
Mere Potential for Future Certiorari Petition After Remand Does Not Prevent Triggering Estoppel of Inter Partes Reexamination
VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC. Before Prost, Moore, and Reyna.  Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Failure... Read More
Bryan Wheelock
Sep 13, 2017
•
Featured
Mere Quantification of the Results of a Known Process is Not Patentable
In Southwire Co. v. Cerro Wire LLC, [2016-2287] (September 8, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision in an... Read More
Scott Mckeown
Feb 11, 2017
•
Featured
Article III Standing Found for PTAB Appeal Where Threat of Suit
Last month, the Federal Circuit made clear that Article III standing is necessary for petitioners to appeal from adverse decisions... Read More