Pedram Sameni
Jun 14, 2023
Featured

Patexia Insight 180: Spotlight on Top ITC Attorneys of 2023

ITC Litigation

Earlier this year in February, our fourth annual ITC Intelligence Report was released, examining the ITC Section 337 investigations filed within the past six years, from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022. The report presents comprehensive statistical data extracted from these investigations at a macro level. Additionally, it offers rankings of activity and performance in various categories for all involved stakeholders and their representatives. We already have covered the growing trend of the Section 337 investigations and this week we will highlight some of the best attorneys earning their mention in this report for their high activity or distinguished performance.

During the past six years, a total of 416 ITC Section 337 investigations were filed, with 326 of them being related to violations. A total of 1,040 unique patents were involved in these 416 ITC investigations for an average of 2.5 patents per each ITC investigation. The following chart shows the ITC Section 337 filings during the period of our study. The upward trend started since 2019 and in 2022 there was a total of 78 Section 337 investigations.

Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, a total of 4,768 attorneys represented one of the parties in an ITC violation investigation. Section 337 investigations involve typically several respondents, leading to a larger number of attorneys representing them. Of the 4,768 attorneys, 2,558 represented complainants, while 3,490 represented respondents. On average, each attorney was involved in 2.5 ITC investigations. It is worth noting that some attorneys were active on both sides, representing different parties in various cases.

The table below presents a selection of exceptional ITC attorneys who have achieved high rankings in the top 250 for their performance or activity, as determined by our ranking methodology. Being included in the top 200 out of a total of 4,768 attorneys places them within the top four percentile.

 

Attorney Law Firm All Cases

Ranked Category

Rank
Alex Lasher Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 42 Overall Activity Rank 1
Adam D. Swain Alston & Bird 30 Overall Activity Rank 3
Paul M. Bartkowski Bartkowski PLLC 27 Complainant Performance Rank 3
Michael T. Renaud Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 13 Complainant Performance Rank 5
Richard A. Kamprath McKool Smith 10 Complainant Performance Rank 9
Deanna Tanner Okun Polsinelli 20 Respondent Activity Rank 14
Philip A. Riley Mei & Mark 19 Respondent Activity Rank 21
Aarti Shah Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton 12 Complainant Performance Rank 34
Kevin J. Patariu Perkins Coie 9 Respondent Performance Rank 36
Cyrus Frelinghuysen Greenberg Traurig LLP 10 Overall Performance Rank 45
Joshua B. Pond Crowell & Moring 9 Overall Performance Rank 65
Nicholas H. Jackson Dentons 9 Complainant Activity Rank 72
Daniel E. Yonan Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox 14 Respondent Performance Rank 79
Libbie A. Dimarco Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks 8 Complainant Performance Rank 148
Bryan A. Kohm Fenwick & West LLP 6 Overall Performance Rank 190

 

The complete ITC Intelligence Report delves deeper by offering statistics pertaining to unfair acts of violation, outcomes of terminated investigations, duration, and the most litigated IPC codes, among other relevant data. Additionally, it provides comprehensive rankings of the top 1,000 attorneys, law firms, and companies across all categories. The report also includes supplementary information such as the top three clients.


RANKING METHODOLOGY

We remain committed to updating and refining our approach, incorporating valuable suggestions to ensure the utmost accuracy and reliability in our assessments. This year, we made significant strides in enhancing our methodology based on the valuable feedback received from the IP community, resulting in notable improvements.

Since more recent activity is a better indicator of a law firm's current level of activity, we use a weighted function that discounts older cases when calculating the total Activity Score. This approach acknowledges that recent cases hold more significance than older ones, as a lack of recent activity could suggest a slowdown. By giving higher value to recent cases, we ensure a more accurate assessment of an attorney's level of activity.

In a terminated ITC investigation, outcomes can vary for respondents, even within the same case. To ensure a fair assessment, our scoring methodology considers these individual respondent outcomes. The table below provides a summary of how we accounted for each investigation outcome and the corresponding scores assigned to the parties and their representatives.

 

Outcome

Complainant   

Respondent  

Comp. Atty/Firm

Resp. Atty/Firm

Withdrawn

0.25

0.75

0.25

0.75

No Violation

0

1

0

1

Settlement

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Consent Order

0.75

0.25

0.75

0.25

Violation, Settlement

0.75

0.25

0.75

0.25

Violation, LEO/GEO/CDO

1

0

1

0

Default

1

0

-

-

Not served

-

-

-

-

 

The outcome of an ITC investigation is influenced by numerous variables that are often beyond the control of any single party. Factors such as the nature of the product, the involved parties, the expertise of attorneys and law firms representing each side, and even the presiding judge can significantly impact the success of a case. Consequently, evaluating the Success Score of an attorney or firm without considering the influence of these interconnected factors fails to present a comprehensive picture and undermines the fairness of the assessment. To mitigate the effect of all other factors, this year for the first time, we implemented a regression model that mathematically removes the impact of other factors when looking at the attorney’s or a firm’s success.

Comparing success scores between firms or attorneys with significantly different workloads can be misleading. The Performance Score used in our IP reports combines the Success and Activity scores through a weighted average. This method is valuable in identifying attorneys and law firms with both high activity levels and a successful track record in ITC Section 337 Investigations. It allows us to recognize experienced and successful practitioners in this field.

Patexia's website users now have access to further enhanced attorney profiles, featuring a litigation module with statistics that were previously available only through reports and tools. These statistics provide valuable data-driven insights, enabling users to make informed decisions and forge meaningful connections with the most suitable legal experts.

Keep an eye out in the coming weeks as we delve deeper into the data from this report. We will explore rankings of the top law firms and companies, along with highlighting the top attorneys in patent and trademark prosecution. Stay tuned for more insightful updates!

Categories
1
0 Comments
Related Articles
Patexia Insight 169: ITC Section 337 Investigations Continue to Rise
Tomorrow, we will release our fourth annual ITC Intelligence Report, which focuses on the International Trade Commission Section 337 investigations... Read More
USITC Appoints Experienced Intellectual Property Litigator as Administrative Law Judge Amid Growing Section 337 Investigations
Earlier today, Patexia announced the release of its Fourth ITC Intelligence Report and Rankings. As covered in Patexia 169, there... Read More