This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/474,639, filed Mar. 30, 2017, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/972,558, filed Aug. 21, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,629,838, which is a continuation-in-part application of the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/284,166, filed on Oct. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,745,356, which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/724,859, filed Mar. 16, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,076,450, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/611,241, filed Sep. 16, 2004. The entirety of all of the aforementioned applications is incorporated herein by reference.

This application was made with government support under certain grants awarded by the NIH. The government has certain right in the application

FIELD

This application relates to the field of neurology. In particular, this application directs to compositions comprising an amiloride and/or an amiloride analog which can be used for reducing nerve injury or nervous system injury in a subject.

BACKGROUND

Nerve injuries may be caused by many conditions, such as degenerative nerve diseases, stroke, ischemia, chemical and mechanical injury to the nervous system. Many types of nerve injury result in changes in the ion flux into neurons which, in turn, lead to neuron cell death. Accordingly, various ion channels may be candidates for mediating this altered ion flux, thus reducing the extent of nerve injuries.

SUMMARY

One aspect of the present application relates to a method for reducing nerve injury in a subject. The method comprises administering to the subject a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of amiloride and amiloride analogs. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered intravenously, intrathecally or intracerebroventricularlly.

In some embodiments, the active ingredient comprises amiloride or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

In other embodiments, the active ingredient comprises an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In a related embodiment, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, 5-(N-ethyl-N-isobutyl)-amiloride (EIPA), bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog is benzamil. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog is a methylated analog of benzamil. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises a ring formed on a guanidine group. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises an acylguanidino group. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

In some embodiments, the amiloride, amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is given in a dose range of 0.1 mg-10 mg/kg body weight.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered within one hour of the onset of an ischemic event, within five hours of the onset of an ischemic event, or between one hour and five hours of the onset of an ischemic event.

In some embodiments, the nerve injury is brain injury.

Another aspect of the present application relates to a method for treating brain injury in a subject. The method comprises administering to said subject a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising amiloride, an amiloride analog, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered intravenously, intrathecally or intracerebroventricularly.

In some embodiments, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, EIPA bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride. In a related embodiment, the amiloride analog is benzamil. In other embodiments, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of methylated analogs of benzamil, amiloride analogs containing a ring formed on a guanidine group, amiloride analogs containing an acylguanidino group, and amiloride analogs containing a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

Another aspect of the present application relates to a method for reducing nervous system injury caused by a change of ion flux into neurons. The method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising amiloride, an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered intravenously, intrathecally, intracerebroventricularly or intramuscularly.

In other embodiments, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, EIPA bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride. In a related embodiment, the amiloride analog is benzamil. In other embodiments, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of methylated analogs of benzamil, amiloride analogs containing a ring formed on a guanidine group, amiloride analogs containing an acylguanidino group, and amiloride analogs containing a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

Another aspect of the present application relates to a method for reducing nervous system injury. The method comprises administering to a subject in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising amiloride, an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered intravenously, intrathecally, intracerebroventricularly or intramuscularly.

Another aspect of the present application relates to a pharmaceutical composition for reducing nervous system injury. The pharmaceutical composition comprises an effective amount of amiloride, an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, wherein the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for intravenous, intrathecal or intracerebroventricular injection.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, EIPA bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride.

In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, wherein the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of methylated analogs of benzamil, amiloride analogs containing a ring formed on a guanidine group, amiloride analogs containing an acylguanidino group, and amiloride analogs containing a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for intravenous, intrathecal, intracerebroventricular or intramuscular injection.

In one embodiment, the amiloride analog is a methylated analog of benzamil. In another embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises a ring formed on a guanidine group. In another embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises an acylguanidino group. In yet another embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view of a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method of reducing neuroinjury in an ischemic subject.

FIG. 2 is a view of a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method of identifying drugs for treating ischemia-related nerve injury.

FIGS. 3A-3D are a series of graphs presenting exemplary data related to the electrophysiology and pharmacology of acid sensing ion channel (ASIC) proteins in cultured mouse cortical neurons.

FIGS. 4A-4D are an additional series of graphs presenting exemplary data related to the electrophysiology and pharmacology of ASIC proteins in cultured mouse cortical neurons.

FIGS. 5A-5D are a set of graphs and traces presenting exemplary data showing that modeled ischemia may enhance activity of ASIC proteins, in accordance with aspects of the present teachings.

FIGS. 6A-6B are a set of graphs and traces presenting exemplary data showing that ASIC proteins in cortical neurons may be Ca²⁺ permeable, and that Ca²⁺ permeability may be ASIC1a dependent.

FIGS. 7A-7D are a set of graphs and traces presenting exemplary data showing that ASIC proteins in cortical neurons may be Ca²⁺ permeable, and that Ca²⁺ permeability may be ASIC1a dependent.

FIGS. 8A-8C are a series of graphs presenting exemplary data showing that acid incubation may induce glutamate receptor-independent neuronal injury that is protected by ASIC blockade.

FIGS. 9A-9D are a series of graphs presenting exemplary data showing that ASIC1a may be involved in acid-induced injury in vitro.

FIGS. 10-10D are a series of graphs with data showing neuroprotection in brain ischemia in vivo by ASIC1a blockade and by ASIC1 gene knockout.

FIG. 11 is a graph plotting exemplary data for the percentage of ischemic damage produced by stroke in an animal model system as a function of the time and type of treatment.

FIG. 12 is a view of the primary amino acid sequence of an exemplary cystine knot peptide, PcTx1, with various exemplary peptide features shown.

FIG. 13 is a comparative view of the cystine knot peptide of FIG. 12 aligned with various exemplary deletion derivatives of the peptide.

FIG. 14 is an exemplary graph plotting the amplitude of calcium current measured in cells as a function of the ASIC family member(s) expressed in the cells.

FIG. 15 is a graph presenting exemplary data related to the efficacy of nasally administered PcTx venom in reducing ischemic injury in an animal model system.

FIGS. 16A-16C are a composite showing representative ASIC1a current traces in CHO cells treated with benzamil (panel A) or 5-(N-ethyl-N-isopropyl) amiloride (EIPA) (panel B), and dose-dependent blockade of ASIC1a current expressed in CHO cells by amiloride and amiloride analogs (panel C).

FIGS. 17A-17C are a composite showing representative ASIC 2a current traces in CHO cells treated with benzamil (panel A) or amiloride (panel B), and dose-dependent blockade of ASIC 2a current expressed in CHO cells by amiloride and amiloride analogs (panel C).

FIG. 18 is a graph showing reduction of infarct volume in mice by intracerebroventricular injections of amiloride or amiloride analogs.

FIG. 19 is a composite showing reduction of infarct volume in the cortical tissue of mice by intravenous injection of saline or amiloride 60 min after MCAO.

FIG. 20 is a composite showing reduction of infarct volume in the cortical tissue of mice by intravenous injection of saline or amiloride 3 hours or 5 hours after MCAO.

FIG. 21 shows structure activity relationship (SAR) for hydrophobic amiloride analogs on various channels.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present application provides methods and compositions for reducing nerve injury. The nerve injury may be caused by degenerative nervous system diseases, stroke, ischemia, trauma, chemical and mechanical injury to the nervous system. As used herein, the term “nervous system” includes both the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system.” The term “central nervous system” or “CNS” includes all cells and tissue of the brain and spinal cord of a vertebrate. The term “peripheral nervous system” refers to all cells and tissue of the portion of the nervous system outside the brain and spinal cord, such as the motor neurons that mediate voluntary movement, the autonomic nervous system that includes the sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system and regulates involuntary functions, and the enteric nervous system that controls the gastrointestinal system. Thus, the term “nervous system” includes, but is not limited to, neuronal cells, glial cells, astrocytes, cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cells in the interstitial spaces, cells in the protective coverings of the spinal cord, epidural cells (i.e., cells outside of the dura mater), cells in non-neural tissues adjacent to or in contact with or innervated by neural tissue, cells in the epineurium, perineurium, endoneurium, funiculi, fasciculi, and the like.

In some embodiments, the nerve injury is a nervous system injury. In other embodiments, the nerve injury is brain injury. In some embodiments, the nerve injury is a nervous system injury caused by changes in the ion flux into neurons. For example, stroke/brain ischemia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Over-activation of the postsynaptic glutamate receptors and subsequent Ca²⁺ toxicity plays a critical role in ischemic brain injury. The present application demonstrates that activation of Ca²⁺-permeable acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) is involved in acidosis-induced, glutamate receptor-independent, ischemic brain injury and provides a new direction for neuroprotection by targeting ASIC family members (ASICs). The present application further provides novel inhibitors of ASICs that have increased potency to homomeric ASICs channel and increased aqueous solubility. In some embodiments, the present application provides pharmaceutical compositions and methods for reducing nerve injury by inhibiting ASIC1a channel.

In some embodiments, the active ingredient comprises amiloride or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In other embodiments, the active ingredient comprises an amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In a related embodiment, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, 5-(N-ethyl-N-isobutyl)-amiloride (EIPA), bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog is benzamil. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog is a methylated analog of benzamil. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises a ring formed on a guanidine group. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises an acylguanidino group. In another related embodiment, the amiloride analog comprises a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

In some embodiments, the amiloride, amiloride analog or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is given in a dose range of 0.1 mg-10 mg/kg body weight. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered within one hour of the onset of an ischemic event, within five hours of the onset of an ischemic event, or between one hour and five hours of the onset of an ischemic event.

Another aspect of the present application provides a composition for treating ischemia or reducing injury resulting from ischemia. The method comprises the step of administering intravenously or intrathecally to a subject in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount of an active ingredient selected from the group consisting of amiloride, amiloride analogs, and salts thereof. The methods of the present application may provide one or more advantages over other methods of ischemia treatment. These advantages may include (1) less ischemia-induced injury, (2) fewer side effects of treatment (e.g., due to selection of a more specific therapeutic target), and/or (3) a longer time window for effective treatment, among others.

FIG. 1 shows a flowchart 20 with exemplary steps 22, 24 that may be performed in a method of reducing nerve injury in an ischemic subject. The steps may be performed any suitable number of times and in any suitable combination. In the method, an ischemic subject (or subjects) may be selected for treatment, indicated at 22. An ASIC-selective inhibitor then may be administered to the ischemic subject(s), indicated at 24. Administration of the inhibitor to the ischemic subject may be in a therapeutically effect amount, to reduce ischemia-induced injury to the subject, for example, reducing the amount of brain damage resulting from a stroke.

A potential explanation for the efficacy of the ischemia treatment of FIG. 1 may be offered by the data of the present teachings (e.g., see Example 1). In particular, the damaging effects of ischemia may not be equal to acidosis, that is, acidification of tissue/cells via ischemia may not be sufficient to produce ischemia-induced injury. Instead, ischemia-induced injury may be caused, in many cases, by calcium flux into cells mediated by a member(s) of the ASIC family, particularly ASIC1a. Accordingly, selective inhibition of the channel activity of ASIC1a may reduce this harmful calcium flux, thereby reducing ischemia-induced injury.

FIG. 2 shows a flowchart 30 with exemplary steps 32, 34 that may be performed in a method of identifying drugs for treatment of ischemia. The steps may be performed any suitable number of times and in any suitable combination. In the method, one or more ASIC-selective inhibitors may be obtained, indicated at 32. The inhibitors then may be tested on an ischemic subject for an effect on ischemia-induced injury, indicated at 34.

Nerve Injuries

The present application is directed to pharmaceutical compositions and methods for reducing nerve injuries in a subject. As used herein, the term “nerve injury” means an acute or chronic injury to or adverse condition of a nervous system tissue or cell resulting from physical transaction or trauma, contusion or compression or surgical lesion, vascular pharmacologic insults including hemorrhagic or ischemic damage, or from neurodegenerative or any other neurological disease, or any other factor causing the injury to or adverse condition of the nervous system tissue or cell. In some embodiments, the nerve injury is caused by cognitive disorders, psychotic disorders, neurotransmitter-mediated disorders or neuronal disorders. Nerve injury includes injuries to the nervous system (i.e., nervous system injuries) and brain injury.

As used herein, the term “cognitive disorders” refers to and intends diseases and conditions that are believed to involve or be associated with or do involve or are associated with progressive loss of structure and/or function of neurons, including death of neurons, and where a central feature of the disorder may be the impairment of cognition (e.g., memory, attention, perception and/or thinking). These disorders include pathogen-induced cognitive dysfunction, e.g. HIV associated cognitive dysfunction or Lyme disease associated cognitive dysfunction. In some embodiments, the cognitive disorders are degenerative cognitive disorders. Examples of degenerative cognitive disorders include Alzheimer's Disease, Huntington's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), autism, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) and epilepsy.

As used herein, the term “psychotic disorders” refers to and intends mental diseases or conditions that are believed to cause or do cause abnormal thinking and perceptions. Psychotic disorders are characterized by a loss of reality which may be accompanied by delusions, hallucinations (perceptions in a conscious and awake state in the absence of external stimuli which have qualities of real perception, in that they are vivid, substantial, and located in external objective space), personality changes and/or disorganized thinking. Other common symptoms include unusual or bizarre behavior, as well as difficulty with social interaction and impairment in carrying out the activities of daily living. Exemplary psychotic disorders are schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, psychosis, anxiety, depression and chronic pain.

As used herein, the term “neurotransmitter-mediated disorders” refers to and intends diseases or conditions that are believed to involve or be associated with or do involve or are associated with abnormal levels of neurotransmitters such as histamine, glutamate, serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine or impaired function of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors. Exemplary neurotransmitter-mediated disorders include spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy, allergic diseases and diseases involving geroprotective activity such as age-associated hair loss (alopecia), age-associated weight loss and age-associated vision disturbances (cataracts). Abnormal neurotransmitter levels are associated with a wide variety of diseases and conditions including, but not limited, to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's Disease, autism, Guillain-Barre syndrome, mild cognitive impairment, schizophrenia, anxiety, multiple sclerosis, stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy, fibromyalgia, bipolar disorders, psychosis, depression and a variety of allergic diseases.

As used herein, the term “neuronal disorders” refers to and intends diseases or conditions that are believed to involve, or be associated with, or do involve or are associated with neuronal cell death and/or impaired neuronal function or decreased neuronal function. Exemplary neuronal indications include neurodegenerative diseases and disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome (CCDS), Lewy body disease, Menkes disease, Wilson disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Fahr disease, an acute or chronic disorder involving cerebral circulation, such as ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or other cerebral hemorrhagic insult, age-associated memory impairment (AAMI), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), injury-related mild cognitive impairment (MCI), post-concussion syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder, adjuvant chemotherapy, traumatic brain injury (TBI), neuronal death mediated ocular disorder, macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, autism, including autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, and Rett syndrome, an avulsion injury, a spinal cord injury, myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, multiple sclerosis, diabetic neuropathy, fibromyalgia, neuropathy associated with spinal cord injury, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, psychosis, anxiety or depression, and chronic pain.

In some embodiments, the nerve injuries or nervous system injuries are caused by a change in the ion flux into neurons or a nervous system tissue. As used herein, the term “nervous system tissue” refers to animal tissue comprising nerve cells, the neuropil, glia, neural inflammatory cells, and endothelial cells in contact with “nervous system tissue”. “Nerve cells” may be any type of nerve cell known to those of skill in the art including, but not limited to neurons. As used herein, the term “neuron” represents a cell of ectodermal embryonic origin derived from any part of the nervous system of an animal. Neurons express well-characterized neuron-specific markers, including neurofilament proteins, NeuN (Neuronal Nuclei marker), MAP2, and class III tubulin. Included as neurons are, for example, hippocampal, cortical, midbrain dopaminergic, spinal motor, sensory, enteric, sympathetic, parasympathetic, septal cholinergic, central nervous system and cerebellar neurons. “Glial cells” useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to astrocytes, Schwan cells, and oligodendrocytes. “Neural inflammatory cells” useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to cells of myeloid origin including macrophages and microglia.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions and methods of the present application relate to reducing nerve injuries caused by ischemia or an ischemia-related condition. Ischemia, as used herein, is a reduced blood flow to an organ(s) and/or tissue(s). The reduced blood flow may be caused by many mechanisms, including but are not limited to, a partial or complete blockage (an obstruction), a narrowing (a constriction), and/or a leak/rupture, of one or more blood vessels that supply blood to the organ(s) and/or tissue(s). Ischemia may be created by thrombosis, an embolism, atherosclerosis, hypertension, hemorrhage, an aneurysm, surgery, trauma, medication, and the like. The reduced blood flow thus may be chronic, transient, acute or sporadic.

Any organ or tissue may experience a reduced blood flow and required treatment for ischemia. Exemplary organs and/or tissues include, but are not limited to, brain, arteries, heart, intestines and eye (e.g., the optic nerve). Ischemia-induced injuries (i.e., disease and/or damage produced by various types of ischemia) include, but are not limited to, ischemic myelopathy, ischemic optic neuropathy, ischemic colitis, coronary heart disease, and/or cardiac heart disease (e.g., angina, heart attack, etc.), among others. Ischemia-induced injury thus may damage and/or kill cells and/or tissue, for example, producing necrotic (infarcted) tissue, inflammation, and/or tissue remodeling, among others, at affected sites within the body. Treatment according to aspects of the present application may reduce the incidence, extent, and/or severity of this injury.

An ischemia-related condition may be any consequence of ischemia. The consequence may be substantially concurrent with the onset ischemia (e.g., a direct effect of the ischemia) and/or may occur substantially after ischemia onset and/or even after the ischemia is over (e.g., an indirect, downstream effect of the ischemia, such reperfusion of tissue when ischemia ends). Exemplary ischemia-related conditions may include any combination of the symptoms (and/or conditions) listed above. Alternatively, or in addition, the symptoms may include local and/or systemic acidosis (pH decrease), hypoxia (oxygen decrease), free radical generation, and/or the like.

In some embodiments, the ischemia-related condition is stroke. Stroke, as used herein, is brain ischemia produced by a reduced blood supply to a part (or all) of the brain. Symptoms produced by stroke may be sudden (such as loss of consciousness) or may have a gradual onset over hours or days. Furthermore, the stroke may be a major ischemic attack (a full stroke) or a more minor, transient ischemic attack, among others. Symptoms produced by stroke may include, for example, hemiparesis, hemiplegia, one-sided numbness, one-sided weakness, one-sided paralysis, temporary limb weakness, limb tingling, confusion, trouble speaking, trouble understanding speech, trouble seeing in one or both eyes, dim vision, loss of vision, trouble walking, dizziness, a tendency to fall, loss of coordination, sudden severe headache, noisy breathing, and/or loss of consciousness. Alternatively, or in addition, the symptoms may be detectable more readily or only via tests and/or instruments, for example, an ischemia blood test (e.g., to test for altered albumin, particular protein isoforms, damaged proteins, etc.), an electrocardiogram, an electroencephalogram, an exercise stress test, brain CT or MRI scanning and/or the like.

Acid-base balance is important for biological systems. Normal brain function depends on the complete oxidation of glucose, with the end product of CO₂and H₂O for its energy requirements. During ischemia, increased anaerobic glycolysis, due to the lack of oxygen supply, leads to lactic acid accumulation. Accumulation of lactic acid, along with increased H⁺ release from ATP hydrolysis, causes decreases in tissue pH. Extracellular pH (pHo) typically falls to 6.5 during ischemia, and it can fall below 6.0 during severe ischemia or under hyperglycemic conditions.

Subjects of Nerve Injury

The method and pharmaceutical composition of the present application can be used in any subject that has a nerve injury or a history of nerve injury and/or a significant chance of developing nerve injury after treatment begins and during a time period in which the treatment is still effective. In some embodiments, the subject is an ischemic subjects. An ischemic subject, as used herein, is any person (a human subject) or animal (an animal subject) that has ischemia, an ischemia-related condition, a history of ischemia, and/or a significant chance of developing ischemia after treatment begins and during a time period in which the treatment is still effective.

The subject may be an animal. The term “animal,” as used herein, refers to any animal that is not human. Exemplary animals that may be suitable include any animal with a bloodstream, such as rodents (mice, rats, etc.), dogs, cats, birds, sheep, goats, non-human primates, etc. The animal may be treated for its own sake, e.g., for veterinary purposes (such as treatment of a pet). Alternatively, the animal may provide an animal model of nerve injury, such as ischemia, to facilitate testing drug candidates for human use, such as to determine the candidates' potency, window of effectiveness, side effects, etc.

Ischemic subjects for treatment may be selected by any suitable criteria. Exemplary criteria may include any detectable symptoms of ischemia, a history of ischemia, an event that increases the risk of (or induces) ischemia (such as a surgical procedure, trauma, administration of a medication, etc.), and/or the like. A history of ischemia may involve one or more prior ischemic episodes. In some examples, a subject selected for treatment may have had an onset of ischemia that occurred at least about one, two, or three hours before treatment begins, or a plurality of ischemic episodes (such as transient ischemic attacks) that occurred less than about one day, twelve hours, or six hours prior to initiation of treatment.

Asic Inhibitors, Amiloride and Amiloride Analogs

Inhibitors of ASIC family members, as used herein, are substances that reduce (partially, substantially, or completely block) the activity or one or more members of the ASIC family, that is, ASIC1a, ASIC1b, ASIC2a, ASIC2b, ASIC3, and ASIC4, among others. In some examples, the inhibitors may reduce the channel activity of one or more members, such as the ability of the members to flux ions (e.g., sodium, calcium, and/or potassium ions, among others) through cell membranes (into and/or out of cells). The substances may be compounds (small molecules of less than about 10 kDa, peptides, nucleic acids, lipids, etc.), complexes of two or more compounds, and/or mixtures, among others. Furthermore, the substances may inhibit ASIC family members by any suitable mechanism including competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive, and/or mixed inhibition, among others.

The inhibitor may be an ASIC1a inhibitor that inhibits acid sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a). ASIC1a, as used herein, refers to an ASIC1a protein or channel from any species. For example, an exemplary human ASIC1a protein/channel is described in Waldmann, R., et al. 1997, Nature 386, pp. 173-177, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The expression “ASIC1a inhibitor” may refer to a product which, within the scope of sound pharmacological judgment, is potentially or actually pharmaceutically useful as an inhibitor of ASIC1a, and includes reference to substances which comprise a pharmaceutically active species and are described, promoted, or authorized as an ASIC1a inhibitor.

An ASIC1a inhibitor may be selective within the ASIC family. Selective inhibition of ASIC1a, as used herein, is inhibition that is substantially stronger on ASIC1a than on another ASIC family member(s) when compared (for example, in cultured cells) after exposure of each to the same (sub-maximal) concentration(s) of an inhibitor. The inhibitor may inhibit ASIC1a selectively relative to at least one other ASIC family member (ASIC1b, ASIC2a, ASIC2b, ASIC3, ASIC 4, etc.) and/or selectively relative to every other ASIC family member. The strength of inhibition for a selective inhibitor may be described by an inhibitor concentration at which inhibition occurs (e.g., an IC₅₀(inhibitor concentration that produces 50% of maximal inhibition) or a K₁value (inhibition constant or dissociation constant)) relative to different ASIC family members. An ASIC1a-selective inhibitor may inhibit ASIC1a activity at a concentration that is at least about two-, four-, or ten-fold lower (one-half, one-fourth, or one-tenth the concentration or lower) than for inhibition of at least one other or of every other ASIC family member. Accordingly, an ASIC1a-selective inhibitor may have an IC₅₀and/or K_ifor ASIC1a inhibition that is at least about two-, four-, or ten-fold lower (one-half, one-fourth, or one-tenth or less) than for inhibition of at least one other ASIC family member and/or for inhibition of every other ASIC family member.

An ASIC1a-selective inhibitor, in addition to being selective, also may be specific for ASIC1a. ASIC1a-specific inhibition, as used herein, is inhibition that is substantially exclusive to ASIC1a relative to every other ASIC family member, such as ASIC2a and ASIC3a. An ASIC1a-specific inhibitor may inhibit ASIC1a at an inhibitor concentration that is at least about twenty-fold lower (5% of the concentration or less) than for inhibition of every other ASIC family member. Accordingly, an ASIC1a-specific inhibitor may have an IC₅₀and/or K_ifor ASIC1a relative to every other member of the ASIC family that is at least about twenty-fold lower (five percent or less), such that, for example, inhibition of other ASIC family members is at least substantially (or completely) undetectable. In some embodiments, the ASIC1a-selective inhibitor has increased potency to homomeric ASIC1a channel and increased aqueous solubility comparing to the commercially available amiloride-related ASIC1a inhibitors such as amiloride benzamil, phenamil, 5-(N-ethyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride (EIPA), bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride.

Any suitable ASIC inhibitor or combination of inhibitors may be used. For example, a subject may be treated with an ASIC1a-selective inhibitor and a nonselective ASIC inhibitor, or with an ASIC1a-selective inhibitor and an inhibitor to a non-ASIC channel protein, such as a non-ASIC calcium channel. In some examples, a subject may be treated with an ASIC1a-selective inhibitor and an inhibitor of NMDA receptors, such as a glutamate antagonist.

The inhibitor may be or include a peptide. The peptide may have any suitable number of amino acid subunits, generally at least about ten and less than about one-thousand subunits. In some examples, the peptide may have a cystine knot motif. A cystine knot, as used herein, generally comprises an arrangement of six or more cysteines. A peptide with these cysteines may create a “knot” including (1) a ring formed by two disulfide bonds and their connecting backbone segments, and (2) a third disulfide bond that threads through the ring. In some examples, the peptide may be a conotoxin from an arachnid and/or cone snail species. For example, the peptide may be PcTx1 (psalmotoxin 1), a toxin from a tarantula (Psalmopoeus cambridgei (Pc)).

In some examples, the peptide may be structurally related to PcTx1, such that the peptide and PcTx1 differ by at least one deletion, insertion, and/or substitution of one or more amino acids. For example, the peptide may have at least about 25% or at least about 50% sequence identity, and/or at least about 25% or at least about 50% sequence similarity with PcTx1 (see below). Further aspects of peptides that may be suitable as inhibitors are described below in Example 3.

Methods of alignment of amino acid sequences for comparison and generation of identity and similarity scores are well known in the art. Exemplary alignment methods that may be suitable include (Best Fit) of Smith and Waterman, a homology alignment algorithm (GAP) of Needleman and Wunsch, a similarity method (Tfasta and Fasta) of Pearson and Lipman, and/or the like. Computer algorithms of these and other approaches that may be suitable include, but are not limited to: CLUSTAL, GAP, BESTFIT, BLASTP, FASTA, and TFASTA.

As used herein, “sequence identity” or “identity” in the context of two peptides relates to the percentage of residues in the corresponding peptide sequences that are the same when aligned for maximum correspondence. In some examples, peptide residue positions that are not identical may differ by conservative amino acid substitutions, where amino acid residues are substituted for other amino acid residues with similar chemical properties (e.g. charge or hydrophobicity) and therefore are expected to produce a smaller (or no) effect on the functional properties of the molecule. Where sequences differ in conservative substitutions, the percent sequence identity may be adjusted upwards, to give a “similarity” of the sequences, which corrects for the conservative nature of the substitutions. For example, each conservative substitution may be scored as a partial rather than a full mismatch, thereby correcting the percentage sequence identity to provide a similarity score. The scoring of conservative substitutions to obtain similarity scores is well known in the art and may be calculated by any suitable approach, for example, according to the algorithm of Meyers and Miller, Computer Applic. Biol Sci., 4: 11-17 (1988), e.g., as implemented in the program PC/GENE (Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif., USA).

Amiloride, a guanidinium group containing pyrazine derivative, has been used for the treatment of mild hypertension with little reported side effect. Amiloride works by directly blocking the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) thereby inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the late distal convoluted tubules, connecting tubules, and collecting ducts in the kidneys. This promotes the loss of sodium and water from the body, but without depleting potassium. As used herein, the term “amiloride” refers to both amiloride and salts of amiloride, such as amiloride hydrochloride.

Amiloride analogs, as used herein, refer to chemical compounds having biological activities similar to those of amiloride but with a slightly altered chemical structure. Examples of amiloride analogs include, but are not limited to, benzamil, phenamil, 5-(N-ethyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride (EIPA), bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl) amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene) amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride. Other examples include amiloride analogs with a hydrophobic substituent at the C₅—NH₂position and/or on the guanidino group, as shown in FIG. 21, as well as methylated analogs of benzamil, amiloride analogs containing a ring formed on a guanidine group, amiloride analogs containing an acylguanidino group, and amiloride analogs containing a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group. In some embodiments, the amiloride analogs do not to block the human Na⁺/Ca²⁺ ion exchanger. In other embodiments, the amiloride analogs are weak inhibitor of the Na⁺/Ca²⁺ ion exchanger and help maintaining low levels of intracellular Ca²⁺. In other embodiments, the amiloride analogs are very weak inhibitor of the Na⁺/Ca²⁺ ion exchanger with an IC₅₀of 1.1 mM or less. In some other embodiments, the amiloride analogs do not block the ASIC2a and/or ASIC3 channels. In one embodiment, the amiloride analogs have increased selectivity for ASIC1a over the ASIC3 channel and/or ASIC2 channel.

As used herein, the term “amiloride analog” refers to both amiloride analog and salts of amiloride analog, such as 5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride hydrochloride.

In some embodiments, amiloride and/or amiloride analogs are used in conjunction with other ASIC inhibitors such as PcTx1 and derivatives thereof.

Administration of Inhibitors

Administration (or administering), as used herein, includes any route of subject exposure to an inhibitor, under any suitable conditions, and at any suitable time(s). Administration may be self-administration or administration by another, such as a health-care practitioner (e.g., a doctor, a nurse, etc.). Administration may be by injection (e.g., intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intracerebral, introcerebroventricular, epidural, and/or intrathecal, among others), ingestion (e.g., using a capsule, lozenge, a fluid composition, etc.), inhalation (e.g., an aerosol (less than about 10 microns average droplet diameter) inhaled nasally and/or orally), absorption through the skin (e.g., with a skin patch) and/or mucosally (e.g., through oral, nasal, and/or pulmonary mucosa, among others), and/or the like. Mucosal administration may be achieved, for example, using a spray (such as a nasal spray), an aerosol that is inhaled), and/or the like. A spray may be a surface spray (droplets on average greater than about 50 microns in diameter) and/or a space spray (droplets on average about 10-50 microns in diameter). In some examples, ischemia may produce an alteration of the blood-brain barrier of an ischemic subject, thus increasing the efficiency with which an inhibitor that is introduced (e.g., by injection and/or absorption) into the bloodstream of a subject can reach the brain. Administration may be performed once or a plurality of times, and at any suitable time relative to ischemia diagnosis, to provide treatment. Accordingly, administration may be performed before ischemia has been detected (e.g., prophylactically) after a minor ischemic episode, during chronic ischemia, after a full stroke, and/or the like. In some embodiments, amiloride or amiloride analog is administered intravenously. In other embodiments, amiloride or amiloride analog is administered intracerebrally. In other embodiments, amiloride or amiloride analog is administered intracerebroventricularly. In other embodiments, amiloride or amiloride analog is administered intramuscularly. In other embodiments, amiloride or amiloride analog is administered intrathecally.

A therapeutically effective amount (or simply “an effective amount”) of an inhibitor may be administered. A therapeutically effective amount or an effective amount of an inhibitor, as used herein, is any amount of the inhibitor that, when administered to subjects, reduces, in a significant number of the subjects, the degree, incidence, and/or extent of ischemia-induced injury in the subjects. Accordingly, a therapeutically effective amount may be determined, for example, in clinical studies in which various amounts of the inhibitor are administered to test subjects (and, generally, compared to a control group of subjects). The therapeutically effective amount of inhibitor or inhibitors may be given by a single injection or multiple injections in a volume of 0.1-50 ml per injection.

In some embodiments, the inhibitor is amiloride, an amiloride analog or a salt thereof and is given at a daily dose (as a single dose or multiple dose) in the range of 0.01-30 mg/kg body weight, 0.01-10 mg/kg body weight, 0.01-3 mg/kg body weight, 0.01-1 mg/kg body weight, 0.01-0.3 mg/kg body weight, 0.01-0.1 mg/kg body weight, 0.01-0.03 mg/kg body weight, 0.03-30 mg/kg body weight, 0.03-10 mg/kg body weight, 0.03-3 mg/kg body weight, 0.03-1 mg/kg body weight, 0.03-0.3 mg/kg body weight, 0.03-0.1 mg/kg body weight, 0.1-30 mg/kg body weight, 0.1-10 mg/kg body weight, 0.1-3 mg/kg body weight, 0.1-1 mg/kg body weight, 0.1-0.3 mg/kg body weight, 0.3-30 mg/kg body weight, 0.3-10 mg/kg body weight, 0.3-3 mg/kg body weight, 0.3-1 mg/kg body weight, 1-30 mg/kg body weight, 1-10 mg/kg body weight, 1-3 mg/kg body weight, 3-30 mg/kg body weight, 3-10 mg/kg body weight or 10-30 mg/kg body weight. In one embodiment, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, EIPA, bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl)-amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)-amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride hydrochloride. In another embodiment, the amiloride analog has a hydrophobic substituent at the C₅—NH₂position and/or on the guanidino group. In another embodiment, the amiloride analog is selected from the amiloride analogs selected from the group consisting of methylated analogs of benzamil, amiloride analogs containing a ring formed on a guanidine group, amiloride analogs containing an acylguanidino group, and amiloride analogs containing a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group.

In other embodiments, the inhibitor is amiloride, an amiloride analog or a salt thereof and is administered as a pharmaceutical composition formulated as a single dose in the range of 0.1-1000 mg/dose, 0.1-300 mg/dose, 0.1-100 mg/dose, 0.1-30 mg/dose, 0.1-10 mg/dose, 0.1-3 mg/dose, 0.1-1 mg/dose, 0.1-0.3 mg/dose, 0.3-1000 mg/dose, 0.3-300 mg/dose, 0.3-100 mg/dose, 0.3-30 mg/dose, 0.3-10 mg/dose, 0.3-3 mg/dose, 0.3-1 mg/dose, 1-1000 mg/dose, 1-300 mg/dose, 1-100 mg/dose, 1-30 mg/dose, 1-10 mg/dose, 1-3 mg/dose, 3-1000 mg/dose, 3-300 mg/dose, 3-100 mg/dose, 3-30 mg/dose, 3-10 mg/dose, 10-1000 mg/dose, 10-300 mg/dose, 10-100 mg/dose, 10-30 mg/dose, 30-1000 mg/dose, 30-300 mg/dose, 30-100 mg/dose, 100-1000 mg/dose, 100-300 mg/dose, or 300-1000 mg/dose. In one embodiment, the amiloride analog is selected from the group consisting of benzamil, phenamil, EIPA, bepridil, KB-R7943, 5-(N-methyl-N-isobutyl)-amiloride, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)-amiloride and 5-(N,N-dimethyl)amiloride hydrochloride. In another embodiment, the amiloride analog has a hydrophobic substituent at the C₅—NH₂position and/or on the guanidino group. In another embodiment, the amiloride analog is selected from the amiloride analogs selected from the group consisting of methylated analogs of benzamil, amiloride analogs containing a ring formed on a guanidine group, amiloride analogs containing an acylguanidino group, and amiloride analogs containing a water solubilizing group formed on a guanidine group, wherein the water solubilizing group is a N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar group. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition formulated for intravenous injection, intracerebral injection, intracerebroventricular injection, intrathecal injection or intramuscular injection.

The inhibitor may be administered in any suitable form and in any suitable composition to subjects. In some examples, the inhibitor may be configured as a pharmaceutically acceptable salt. The composition may be formulated to include, for example, a fluid carrier/solvent (a vehicle), a preservative, one or more excipients, a coloring agent, a flavoring agent, a salt(s), an anti-foaming agent, and/or the like. The inhibitor may be present at a concentration in the vehicle that provides a therapeutically effective amount of the inhibitor for treatment of ischemia when administered to an ischemic subject.

In some embodiments, amiloride analogs with higher water solubility or lipid solubility are produced. In certain embodiments, the amiloride analogs contain a water solubilizing group, such as an N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar, at the guanidino group to improve water solubility (formula 13-16, FIG. 24). In some embodiments, the amiloride analogs have a water solubility of 5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM, 60 mM, 70 mM, 80 mM, 90 mM, 100 mM or higher. In other embodiments, the amiloride analogs have a solubility that allows for a 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg dose to be administered intravenously to a human in a single 10 ml injection. In yet other embodiments, the amiloride analogs have a solubility that allows for a 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg dose to be administered intracerebroventicularly to a human in a single 2 ml injection.

Synthesis and Screening of Amiloride Analogs

Another aspect of the present application relates to the synthesis and screening of new amiloride analogs. Synthesis pathway of amiloride analogs are designed based on the desired analog structure. The newly synthesized amiloride analogs are then screened for their inhibitive effect on ASIC family members, such as ASIC1a and ASIC2a. One or more ASIC inhibitors, particularly ASIC1a inhibitors as described above, may be obtained. The inhibitors may be obtained by any suitable approach, such by screening a set of candidate inhibitors (e.g., a library of two or more compounds) and/or by rationale design, among others.

Screening may involve any suitable assay system that measures interaction between ASIC proteins and the set of candidate inhibitors. Exemplary assay systems may include assays performed biochemically (e.g., binding assays), with cells grown in culture (“cultured cells”), and/or with organisms, among others.

In some embodiments, a cell-based assay system is used to measure the effect of each candidate inhibitor on ion flux, such as acid-sensitive ion flux, in the cells. In some embodiments, the ion flux is a flux of calcium and/or sodium. In some embodiments, the assay system uses cells expressing an ASIC family member, such as ASIC1a or ASIC2a, or two or more distinct sets of cells expressing two or more distinct ASIC family members, such as ASIC1a and another ASIC family member(s), to determine the selectivity of each inhibitor for these family members. The cells may express each ASIC family member endogenously or through introduction of foreign nucleic acid. In some examples, the assay system may measure ion flux electrophysiologically (such as by patch clamp), using an ion-sensitive or membrane potential-sensitive dye (e.g., a calcium sensitive dye such as Fura-2), or via a gene-based reporter system that is sensitive to changes in membrane potential and/or intracellular ion (e.g., calcium) concentrations, among others. The assay system may be used to test candidate inhibitors for selective and/or specific inhibition of ASIC family members, particularly ASIC1a.

One or more ASIC inhibitors may be administered to a subject with a nerve injury, such as an ischemic subject to test the efficacy of the inhibitors for treatment of the nerve injury. The ischemic subjects may be people or animals. In some examples, the ischemic subjects may provide an animal model system of ischemia and/or stroke. Exemplary animal model systems include rodents (mice and/or rats, among others) with ischemia induced experimentally. The ischemia may be induced mechanically (e.g., surgically) and/or by administration of a drug, among others. In some examples, the ischemia may be induced by occlusion of a blood vessel, such as by constriction of a mid-cerebral artery.

In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition further comprises one or more other ASIC inhibitors. In one embodiment, the one or more other ASIC inhibitors comprise PcTx1 or a PcTx1 derivative.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for intravenous, intrathecal, intracerebroventricular or intramuscular injection.

As used herein, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” includes any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, sweeteners and the like. The pharmaceutically acceptable carriers may be prepared from a wide range of materials including, but not limited to, flavoring agents, sweetening agents and miscellaneous materials such as buffers and absorbents that may be needed in order to prepare a particular therapeutic composition. The use of such media and agents with pharmaceutically active substances is well known in the art. Except insofar as any conventional media or agent is incompatible with the active ingredient, its use in the therapeutic compositions is contemplated. Optionally, the amiloride and/or an amiloride analog may be mixed together into pharmaceutical compositions comprising supplementary active ingredients that are not contraindicated by said amiloride and/or an amiloride analog.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for intravenous injection. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises amiloride and/or amiloride analog formulated for intravenous injection. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises amiloride and/or amiloride analog formulated for intracerebroventricular injection. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises amiloride and/or amiloride analog formulated for intrathecal injection. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition comprises amiloride and/or amiloride analog formulated for intramuscular injection. Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for injectable use include sterile aqueous solutions (where water soluble) or dispersions and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions or dispersion. For intravenous administration, suitable carriers include physiological saline, bacteriostatic water, Cremophor EL™ (BASF, Parsippany, N.J.) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS). In all cases, the injectable compositions are sterile and are fluid to the extent that easy syringability exists. The injectable composition must be stable under the conditions of manufacture and storage and must be preserved against the contaminating action of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. The carrier can be a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for example, water, ethanol, polyol (for example, glycerol, propylene glycol, and liquid polyethylene glycol, and the like), and suitable mixtures thereof. The proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of a coating such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the requited particle size in the case of dispersion and by the use of surfactants. Prevention of the action of microorganisms can be achieved by various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, ascorbic acid, thimerosal, and the like. In many cases, it will be preferable to include isotonic agents, for example, sugars, polyalcohols such as manitol, sorbitol, sodium chloride in the composition. Prolonged absorption of the injectable compositions can be brought about by including in the composition an agent which delays absorption, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

Sterile injectable solutions can be prepared by incorporating amiloride and/or amiloride analog in the required amount in an appropriate solvent, followed by filtered sterilization. Generally, dispersions are prepared by incorporating the active compound into a sterile vehicle which contains a basic dispersion medium and the required other ingredients from those enumerated above. In the case of sterile powders for the preparation of sterile injectable solutions, the preferred methods of preparation are vacuum drying and freeze-drying which yields a powder of the active, ingredient plus any additional desired ingredient from a previously sterile-filtered solution thereof.

In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is provided in a dry form, and is formulated into a tablet or capsule form. Tablets may be formulated in accordance with conventional procedures employing solid carriers well-known in the art. Hard and soft capsules employed in the present invention can be made from any pharmaceutically acceptable material, such as gelatin or cellulosic derivatives.

In certain embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for immediate release, extended-release, delayed-release or combinations thereof. Extended-release, also known as sustained-release, time-release or timed-release, controlled-release (CR), modified release (MR), or continuous-release (CR or Contin), is a mechanism used in medicine tablets or capsules to dissolve slowly and release the active ingredient over time. The advantages of sustained-release tablets or capsules are that they can often be taken less frequently than instant-release formulations of the same drug, and that they keep steadier levels of the drug in the bloodstream, thus extending the duration of the drug action.

In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for extended release by embedding the active ingredient in a matrix of insoluble substance(s) such as acrylics or chitin. A extended release form is designed to release the active ingredient at a predetermined rate by maintaining a constant drug level for a specific period of time. This can be achieved through a variety of formulations, including, but not limited to liposomes and drug-polymer conjugates, such as hydrogels.

In another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for delayed-release, such that the active ingredient(s) is not immediately released upon administration. A non-limiting example of a delayed release vehicle is an enteric coated oral medication that dissolves in the intestines rather than the stomach.

In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for immediate release of a portion of the active ingredient, followed with an extended-release of the remainder of the active ingredient. In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated as a powder that can be ingested for rapid release of the active ingredient. In another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated into a liquid, gel, liquid suspension or emulsion form. Said liquid, gel, suspension or emulsion may be ingested by the subject in naked form or contained within a capsule.

In yet another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition may be provided as a skin or transdermal patch for the topical administration of controlled and/or sustained quantities of the active ingredient.

EXAMPLES

The following examples describes selected aspects and embodiments of the present teachings, particularly data describing in vitro and in vivo effects of ASIC inhibition, and exemplary cystine knot peptides for use as inhibitors. These examples are intended for the purposes of illustration and should not be construed to limit the scope of the present teachings.

Example 1: Neuroprotection in Ischemia by Blocking Calcium-Permeable Acid-Sensing Ion Channels

This example describes experiments showing a role of ASIC1a in mediating ischemic injury and the ability ASIC1a inhibitors to reduce ischemic injury; see FIGS. 2-10. Ca²⁺ toxicity may play a central role in ischemic brain injury. The mechanism by which toxic Ca²⁺ loading of cells occurs in the ischemic brain has become less clear as multiple human trials of glutamate antagonists have failed to show effective neuroprotection in stroke. Acidosis is a common feature of ischemia and plays a critical role in brain injury. This example demonstrates that acidosis activates Ca²⁺-permeable acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs), which may induce glutamate receptor-independent, Ca²⁺-dependent, neuronal injury. Accordingly, cells lacking endogenous ASICs may be resistant to acid injury, while transfection of Ca²⁺-permeable ASIC1a may establish sensitivity. In focal ischemia, intracerebroventricular injection of ASIC1a blockers or knockout of the ASIC1a gene may protect the brain from ischemic injury and may do so more potently than glutamate antagonism.

The normal brain requires complete oxidation of glucose to fulfill its energy requirements. During ischemia, oxygen depletion forces the brain to switch to anaerobic glycolysis. Accumulation of lactic acid as a byproduct of glycolysis and protons produced by ATP hydrolysis causes pH to fall in the ischemic brain and aggravates ischemic brain injury.

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are a class of ligand-gated channels expressed throughout neurons of mammalian central and peripheral nervous systems. To date, six ASIC subunits have been cloned. Four of these subunits form functional homomultimeric channels that are activated by acidic pH to conduct a sodium-selective, amiloride-sensitive, cation current. Two of the ASIC subunits, ASIC1a and ASIC2a subunits, have been shown to be abundant in the brain.

Experimental Procedures
Neuronal Culture

Following anesthesia with halothane, cerebral cortices were dissected from E16 Swiss mice or P1 ASIC1^+/+and ASIC1^−/−mice and incubated with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA for 10 min at 37° C. Tissues were then triturated with fire-polished glass pipettes and plated on poly-L-ornithine-coated 24-well plates or 25×25 mm glass coverslips at a density of 2.5×10⁵cells per well or 10⁶cells per coverslip. Neurons were cultured with MEM supplemented with 10% horse serum (for E16 cultures) or Neurobasal medium supplemented with B27 (for P1 cultures) and used for electrophysiology and toxicity studies after 12 days. Glial growth was suppressed by addition of 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine and uridine, yielding cultured cells with 90% neurons as determined by NeuN and GFAP staining (data not shown).

Electrophysiology

ASIC currents were recorded with whole-cell patch-clamp and fast-perfusion techniques. The normal extracellular solution (ECF) contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 25 HEPES, 20 glucose, 1.3 CaCl₂), 1.0 MgCl₂, 0.0005 TTX (pH 7.4), 320-335 mOsm. For low pH solutions, various amounts of HCl were added. For solutions with pH<6.0, IVIES instead of HEPES was used for more reliable pH buffering. Patch electrodes contained (in mM) 140 CsF, 2.0 MgCl₂, 1.0 CaC₂, 10 HEPES, 11 EGTA, 4 MgATP (pH 7.3), 300 mOsm. The Natfree solution consisted of 10 mM CaCl₂), 25 mM HEPES with equiosmotic NMDG or sucrose substituting for NaCl (Chu et al., 2002). A multibarrel perfusion system (SF-77B, Warner Instrument Co.) was employed for rapid exchange of solutions.

Cell Injury Assay—LDH Measurement

Cells were washed three times with ECF and randomly divided into treatment groups. MK801 (10 μM), CNQX (20 μM), and nimodipine (5 μM) were added in all groups to eliminate potential secondary activation of glutamate receptors and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels. Following acid incubation, neurons were washed and incubated in Neurobasal medium at 37° C. LDH release was measured in culture medium using the LDH assay kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Medium (100 μL) was transferred from culture wells to 96-well plates and mixed with 100 μL reaction solution provided by the kit. Optical density was measured at 492 nm 30 min later, utilizing a microplate reader (Spectra Max Plus, Molecular Devices). Background absorbance at 620 was subtracted. The maximal releasable LDH was obtained in each well by 15 min incubation with 1% Triton X-100 at the end of each experiment.

Ca²⁺ Imaging

Cortical neurons grown on 25×25 mm glass coverslips were washed three times with ECF and incubated with 5 μM fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester for 40 min at 22° C., washed three times, and incubated in normal ECF for 30 min. Coverslips were transferred to a perfusion chamber on an inverted microscope (Nikon TE300). Cells were illuminated using a xenon lamp and observed with a 40×UV fluor oil-immersion objective lens, and video images were obtained using a cooled CCD camera (Sensys KAF 1401, Photometrics). Digitized images were acquired and analyzed in a PC controlled by Axon Imaging Workbench software (Axon Instruments). The shutter and filter wheel (Lambda 10-2) were controlled by the software to allow timed illumination of cells at 340 or 380 nm excitation wavelengths. Fura-2 fluorescence was detected at emission wavelength of 510 nm. Ratio images (340/380) were analyzed by averaging pixel ratio values in circumscribed regions of cells in the field of view. The values were exported to SigmaPlot for further analysis.

Fluorescein-Diacetate Staining and Propidium Iodide Uptake

Cells were incubated in ECF containing fluorescein-diacetate (FDA) (5 μM) and propidium iodide (PI) (2 μM) for 30 min followed by wash with dye-free ECF. Alive (FDA-positive) and dead (PI-positive) cells were viewed and counted on a microscope (Zeiss) equipped with epifluorescence at 580/630 nm excitation/emission for PI and 500/550 nm for FDA. Images were collected using an Optronics DEI-730 camera equipped with a BQ 8000 sVGA frame grabber and analyzed using computer software (Bioquant, TN).

Transfection of COS-7 Cells

COS-7 cells were cultured in MEM with 10% HS and 1% PenStrep (GIBCO). At ˜50% confluence, cells were cotransfected with cDNAs for ASICs and GFP in pc^DNA3vector using FuGENE6 transfection reagents (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). DNA for ASICs (0.75 μg) and 0.25 μg of DNA for GFP were used for each 35 mm dish. GFP-positive cells were selected for patch-clamp recording 48 hr after transfection. For stable transfection of ASIC1a, 500 μg/mL G418 was added to culture medium I week following the transfection. The surviving G418-resistant cells were further plated and passed for >5 passages in the presence of G418. Cells were then checked with patch-clamp and immunofluorescent staining for the expression of ASIC1a.

Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation

Neurons were washed three times and incubated with glucose-free ECF at pH 7.4 or 6.0 in an anaerobic chamber (Model 1025, Forma Scientific) with an atmosphere of 85% N₂, 10% H₂, and 5% CO₂at 35° C. Oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) was terminated after 1 hr by replacing the glucose-free ECF with Neurobasal medium and incubating the cultures in a normal cell culture incubator. With HEPES-buffered ECF used, 1 hr OGD slightly reduced pH from 7.38 to 7.28 (n=3) and from 6.0 to 5.96 (n=4).

Focal Ischemia

Transient focal ischemia was induced by suture occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO) in male rats (SD, 250-300 g) and mice (with congenic C57B16 background, ˜25 g) anesthetized using 1.5% isoflurane, 70% N₂O, and 28.5% O₂with intubation and ventilation. Rectal and temporalis muscle temperature was maintained at 37° C.±0.5° C. with a thermostatically controlled heating pad and lamp. Cerebral blood flow was monitored by transcranical LASER doppler. Animals with blood flow not reduced below 20% were excluded.

Animals were killed with chloral hydrate 24 hr after ischemia. Brains were rapidly removed, sectioned coronally at 1 mm (mice) or 2 mm (rats) intervals, and stained by immersion in vital dye (2%) 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium hydrochloride (TTC). Infarction area was calculated by subtracting the normal area stained with TTC in the ischemic hemisphere from the area of the nonischemic hemisphere. Infarct volume was calculated by summing infarction areas of all sections and multiplying by slice thickness. Rat intraventricular injection was performed by stereotaxic technique using a microsyringe pump with cannula inserted stereotactically at 0.8 mm posterior to bregma, 1.5 mm lateral to midline, and 3.8 mm ventral to the dura. All manipulations and analyses were performed by individuals blinded to treatment groups.

Results
(a) Acidosis Activates ASICs in Mouse Cortical Neurons

FIGS. 3 and 4 shows exemplary data related to the electrophysiology and pharmacology of ASICs in cultured mouse cortical neurons. FIGS. 3A and 3B are graphs illustrating the pH dependence of ASIC currents activated by a pH drop from 7.4 to the pH values indicated. Dose-response curves were fit to the Hill equation with an average pH_0.5of 6.18±0.06 (n=10). FIGS. 3C and 3D are graphs illustrating the current-voltage relationship of ASICs (n=5). The amplitudes of ASIC current at various voltages were normalized to that recorded at −60 mV. FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphs illustrating a dose-dependent blockade of ASIC currents by amiloride. IC₅₀=16.4±4.1 μM, N=8. FIGS. 4C and 4D are graphs illustrating a blockade of ASIC currents by PcTX venom. **p<0.01.

ASIC currents in cultured mouse cortical neurons were recorded (see FIG. 3). At a holding potential of −60 mV, a rapid reduction of extracellular pH (pH_e) to below 7.0 evoked large transient inward currents with a small steady-state component in the majority of neurons (FIG. 3A). The amplitude of inward current increased in a sigmoidal fashion as pH_edecreased, yielding a pH_0.5of 6.18±0.06 (n=10, FIG. 3B). A linear I-V relationship and a reversal close to the Na⁺ equilibrium potential were obtained (n=6, FIGS. 3C and 3D). These data demonstrate that lowering pH_emay activate typical ASICs in mouse cortical neurons.

The effect of amiloride, a nonspecific blocker of ASICs, on the acid-activated currents was tested (see FIG. 4). As shown in FIG. 4, amiloride dose-dependently blocked ASIC currents in cortical neurons with an IC₅₀of 16.4±4.1 μM (n=8, FIGS. 4A and 4B). The effect of PcTX venom on acid-activated current in cortical neurons is shown in FIGS. 4C and 4D. At 100 ng/mL, PcTX venom reversibly blocked the peak amplitude of ASIC current by 47%±7% (n=15, FIGS. 4C and 4D), indicating significant contributions of homomeric ASIC1a to total acid-activated currents. Increasing PcTX concentration did not induce further reduction in the amplitude of ASIC current in the majority of cortical neurons (n=8, data not shown), indicating coexistence of PcTX-insensitive ASICs (e.g., heteromeric ASIC1a/2a) in these neurons.

(b) ASIC Response is Potentiated by Modeled Ischemia

FIG. 5 shows exemplary data indicating that modeled ischemia may enhance activity of ASICs. FIG. 5A is a series of exemplary traces showing an increase in amplitude and a decrease in desensitization of ASIC currents following 1 hr OGD. FIG. 5B is a graph of summary data illustrating an increase of ASIC current amplitude in OGD neurons. N=40 and 44, *p<0.05. FIG. 5C is a series of exemplary traces and summary data showing decreased ASIC current desensitization in OGD neurons. N=6, **p<0.01. FIG. 5D is a pair of exemplary traces showing lack of acid-activated current at pH 6.0 in ASIC1^−/− neurons, in control condition, and following 1 hr OGD (n=12 and 13).

Since acidosis may be a central feature of brain ischemia, it was determined to test whether ASICs may be activated in ischemic conditions and whether ischemia may modify the properties of these channels; see FIG. 5. ASIC currents in neurons following 1 hr oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) were recorded. Briefly, one set of cultures was washed three times with glucose-free extracellular fluid (ECF) and subjected to OGD, while control cultures were subjected to washes with glucose containing ECF and incubation in a conventional cell culture incubator. OGD was terminated after 1 hr by replacing glucose-free ECF with Neurobasal medium and incubating cultures in the conventional incubator. ASIC current was then recorded 1 hr following the OGD when there was no morphological alteration of neurons. OGD treatment induced a moderate increase of the amplitude of ASIC currents (1520±138 pA in control group, N=44; 1886±185 pA in neurons following 1 hr OGD, N=40, p<0.05, FIGS. 5A and 5B). More importantly, OGD induced a dramatic decrease in ASIC desensitization as demonstrated by an increase in time constant of the current decay (814.7±58.9 ms in control neurons, N=6; 1928.9±315.7 ms in neurons following OGD, N=6, p<0.01, FIGS. 5A and 5C). In cortical neurons cultured from ASIC1^−/− mice, reduction of pH from 7.4 to 6.0 did not activate any inward current (n=52), similar to a previous study in hippocampal neurons (Wemmie et al., 2002). In these neurons, 1 hr OGD did not activate or potentiate acid-induced responses (FIG. 5D, n=12 and 13).

FIGS. 6 and 7 show exemplary data suggesting that ASICs in cortical neurons may be Ca²⁺ permeable, and that Ca²⁺ permeability may be ASIC1a dependent. FIG. 6A shows exemplary traces obtained with Natfree ECF containing 10 mM Ca²⁺ as the only charge carrier. Inward currents were recorded at pH 6.0. The average reversal potential is ˜−17 mV after correction of liquid junction potential (n=5). FIG. 6B shows representative traces and summary data illustrating blockade of Ca²⁺-mediated current by amiloride and PcTX venom. The peak amplitude of Ca²⁺-mediated current decreased to 26%±2% of control value by 100 μM amiloride (n=6, p<0.01) and to 22%±0.9% by 100 ng/mL PcTX venom (n=5, p<0.01). FIG. 7A shows exemplary 340/380 nm ratios as a function of pH, illustrating an increase of [Ca²⁺]_iby pH drop to 6.0. Neurons were bathed in normal ECF containing 1.3 mM CaCl₂) with blockers for voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (5 μM nimodipine and 1 μM w-conotoxin MVIIC) and glutamate receptors (10 μM MK801 and 20 μM CNQX). The inset of FIG. 7A shows exemplary inhibition of acid-induced increase of [Ca²⁺]_i, by 100 μM amiloride. FIG. 7B shows exemplary summary data illustrating inhibition of acid-induced increase of [Ca²⁺]_iby amiloride and PcTX venom. N=6-8, **p<0.01 compared with pH 6.0 group. FIG. 7C shows exemplary 340/380 nm ratios as a function of pH and NMDA presence/absence, demonstrating a lack of acid-induced increase of [Ca²⁺]_iin ASIC1^−/− neurons; neurons had a normal response to NMDA (n=8). FIG. 7D shows exemplary traces illustrating a lack of acid-activated current at pH 6.0 in ASIC1^−/− neurons.

The Ca²⁺ permeability of ASICs in cortical neurons was determined using a standard ion-substitution protocol (Jia et al., Neuron, 1996, 17:945-956) and the Fura-2 fluorescent Ca²⁺-imaging technique (Chu et al., 2002, J. Neurophysiol. 87:2555-2561). With bath solutions containing 10 mM Ca²⁺ (Na⁺and K⁺-free) as the only charge carrier and at a holding potential of −60 mV, we recorded inward currents larger than 50 pA in 15 out of 18 neurons, indicating significant Ca²⁺ permeability of ASICs in the majority of cortical neurons (FIG. 6A). Consistent with activation of homomeric ASIC1a channels, currents carried by 10 mM Ca²⁺ were largely blocked by both the nonspecific ASIC blocker amiloride and the ASIC1a-specific blocker PcTX venom (FIG. 6B). The peak amplitude of Ca²-mediated current was decreased to 26%±2% of control by 100 μM amiloride (n=6, p<0.01) and to 22%±0.9% by 100 ng/mL PcTX venom (n=5, p<0.01). Ca²⁺ imaging, in the presence of blockers of other major Ca²⁺ entry pathways (MK801 10 μM and CNQX 20 μM for glutamate receptors; nimodipine 5 μM and ω-conotoxin MVIIC 1 μM for voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels), demonstrated that 18 out of 20 neurons responded to a pH drop with detectable increases in the concentration of intracellular Ca²⁺ ([Ca²⁺]_i) (FIG. 7A). In general, [Ca²⁺]_i, remains elevated during prolonged perfusion of low pH solutions. In some cells, the [Ca²⁺]_iincrease lasted even longer than the duration of acid perfusion (FIG. 7A). Long-lasting Ca²⁺ responses suggest that ASIC response in intact neurons may be less desensitized than in whole-cell recordings or that Ca²⁺ entry through ASICs may induce subsequent Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores. Preincubation of neurons with 1 μM thapsigargin partially inhibited the sustained component of Ca²⁺ increase, suggesting that Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores may also contribute to acid-induced intracellular Ca²⁺ accumulation (n=6, data not shown). Similar to the current carried by Ca²⁺ ions (FIG. 6B), both peak and sustained increases in [Ca²⁺]_iwere largely inhibited by amiloride and PcTX venom (FIGS. 7A and 7B, n=6-8), consistent with involvement of homomeric ASIC1a in acid-induced [Ca²⁺]_iincrease. Knockout of the ASICI gene eliminated the acid-induced [Ca²⁺]_iincrease in all neurons without affecting NMDA receptor-mediated Ca²⁺ response (FIG. 7C, n=8). Patch-clamp recordings demonstrated lack of acid-activated currents at pH 6.0 in 52 out of 52 of the ASIC1^−/− neurons, consistent with absence of ASIC1a subunits. Lowering pH to 5.0 or 4.0, however, activated detectable current in 24 out of 52 ASIC1^−/− neurons, indicating the presence of ASIC2a subunits in these neurons (FIG. 7D). Further electrophysiological studies demonstrated that ASIC1^−/− neurons have normal responses for various voltage-gated channels and NMDA, GABA receptor-gated channels (data not shown).

(d) ASIC Blockade Protects Acidosis-Induced, Glutamate-Independent Neuronal Injury

FIG. 8 shows exemplary data suggesting that acid incubation may induce glutamate receptor-independent neuronal injury protected by ASIC blockade. FIGS. 8A and 8B show graphs presenting exemplary data for time-dependent LDH release induced by 1 hr (FIG. 8A) or 24 hr incubation (FIG. 8B) of cortical neurons in pH 7.4 (solid bars) or 6.0 ECF (open bars). N=20-25 wells, *p<0.05, and **p<0.01, compared to pH 7.4 group at the same time points (acid-induced neuronal injury with fluorescein diacetate (FDA) also was analyzed by staining of cell bodies of alive neurons and propidium iodide (PI) staining of nuclei of dead neurons). FIG. 8C shows a graph illustrating inhibition of acid-induced LDH release by 100 μM amiloride or 100 ng/mL PcTX venom (n=20-27, *p<0.05, and **p<0.01). MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine were present in ECF for all experiments (FIGS. 8A-C).

Acid-induced injury was studied on neurons grown on 24-well plates incubated in either pH 7.4 or 6.0 ECF containing MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine; see FIG. 8. Cell injury was assayed by the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (Koh and Choi, J. Neurosci., 1987, 20:83-90) at various time points (FIGS. 8A and 8B) and by fluorescent staining of alive/dead cells. Compared to neurons treated at pH 7.4, 1 hr acid incubation (pH 6.0) induced a time-dependent increase in LDH release (FIG. 8A). After 24 hr, 45.7%±5.4% of maximal LDH release was induced (n=25 wells). Continuous treatment at pH 6.0 induced greater cell injury (FIG. 8B, n=20). Consistent with the LDH assay, alive/dead staining with fluorescein diacetate and propidium iodide showed similar increases in cell death by 1 hr acid treatment (data not shown). One hour incubation with pH 6.5 ECF also induced significant but less LDH release than with pH 6.0 ECF (n=8 wells, data not shown).

The effect of amiloride and PcTX venom on acid-induced LDH release were tested to determine whether activation of ASICs is involved in acid-induced glutamate receptor-independent neuronal injury. Addition of either 100 μM amiloride or 100 ng/mL PcTX venom 10 min before and during the 1 hr acid incubation significantly reduced LDH release (FIG. 8C). At 24 hr, LDH release was decreased from 45.3%±3.8% to 31.1%±2.5% by amiloride and to 27.9%±2.6% by PcTX venom (n=20-27, p<0.01). Addition of amiloride or PcTX venom in pH 7.4 ECF for 1 hr did not affect baseline LDH release, although prolonged incubation (e.g., 5 hr) with amiloride alone increased LDH release (n=8, data not shown).

(e) Activation of Homomeric ASIC1a is Responsible for Acidosis-Induced Injury

FIG. 9 is a series of graphs presenting exemplary data indicating that ASIC1a may be involved in acid-induced injury in vitro. FIG. 9A shows exemplary data illustrating inhibition of acid-induced LDH release by reducing [Ca²⁺]_e(n=11-12, **p<0.01 compared with pH 6.0, 1.3 Ca²⁺). FIG. 9B shows exemplary data illustrating acid incubation induced increase of LDH release in ASIC1a-transfected but not nontransfected COS-7 cells (n=8-20). Amiloride (100 μM) inhibited acid-induced LDH release in ASIC1a-transfected cells. *p<0.05 for 7.4 versus 6.0 and 6.0 versus 6.0+amiloride. FIG. 9C shows exemplary data illustrating a lack of acid-induced injury and protection by amiloride and PcTX venom in ASIC1^−/−neurons (n=8 in each group, p>0.05). FIG. 9D shows exemplary data illustrating acid-induced increase of LDH release in cultured cortical neurons under OGD (n=5). LDH release induced by combined 1 hr OGD/acidosis was not inhibited by trolox and L-NAME (n=8-11). OGD did not potentiate acid-induced LDH release in ASIC1^−/− neurons. **p<0.01 for pH 7.4 versus pH 6.0 and *p<0.05 for pH 6.0 versus 6.0+PcTX venom. MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine were present in ECF for all experiments (FIG. 9A-D).

Neurons were treated with pH 6.0 ECF in the presence of normal or reduced [Ca²]_eto determine whether Ca²⁺ entry plays a role in acid-induced injury (see FIG. 9). Reducing Ca²⁺ from 1.3 to 0.2 mM inhibited acid-induced LDH release (from 40.0%±4.1% to 21.9%±2.5%), as did ASIC1a blockade with PcTX venom (n=11-12, p<0.01; FIG. 9A). Ca²⁺-free solution was not tested, as a complete removal of [Ca²⁺]_emay activate large inward currents through a Ca²⁺-sensing cation channel, which may otherwise complicate data interpretation. Inhibition of acid injury by both amiloride and PcTX, nonspecific and specific ASIC1a blockers, and by reducing [Ca²⁺]_esuggests that activation of Ca²⁺-permeable ASIC1a may be involved in acid-induced neuronal injury.

Acid injury of nontransfected and ASIC1a transfected COS-7 cells was studied to provide additional evidence that activation of ASIC1a is involved in acid injury. COS-7 is a cell line commonly used for expression of ASICs due to its lack of endogenous channels. Following confluence (36-48 hr after plating), cells were treated with either pH 7.4 or 6.0 ECF for 1 hr. LDH release was measured 24 hr after acid incubation. Treatment of nontransfected COS-7 cells with pH 6.0 ECF did not induce increased LDH release when compared with pH 7.4-treated cells (10.3%±0.8% for pH 7.4, and 9.4%±0.7% for pH 6.0, N=19 and 20 wells; p>0.05, FIG. 9B). However, in COS-7 cells stably transfected with ASIC1a, 1 hr incubation at pH 6.0 significantly increased LDH release from 15.5%±2.4% to 24.0%±2.9% (n=8 wells, p<0.05). Addition of amiloride (100 μM) inhibited acid-induced LDH release in these cells (FIG. 9B).

Acid injury of CHO cells transiently transfected with cDNAs encoding GFP alone or GFP plus ASIC1a was also studied. After the transfection (24-36 hr), cells were incubated with acidic solution (pH 6.0) for 1 hr, and cell injury was assayed 24 hr following the acid incubation. One hour acid incubation largely reduced surviving GFP-positive cells in GFP/ASIC1a group but not in the group transfected with GFP alone (data not shown).

Cell toxicity experiments on cortical neurons cultured from ASIC^+/+ and ASIC1^−/− mice were performed to further demonstrate an involvement of ASIC1a in acidosis-induced neuronal injury. Again, 1 hr acid incubation of ASIC^+/+ neurons at 6.0 induced substantial LDH release that was reduced by amiloride and PcTX venom (n=8-12). One hour acid treatment of ASIC1^−/− neurons, however, did not induce significant increase in LDH release at 24 hr (13.8%±0.9% for pH 7.4 and 14.2%±1.3% for pH 6.0, N=8, p>0.05), indicating resistance of these neurons to acid injury (FIG. 9C). In addition, knockout of the ASIC1 gene also eliminated the effect of amiloride and PcTX venom on acid-induced LDH release (FIG. 9C, n=8 each), further suggesting that the inhibition of acid-induced injury of cortical neurons by amiloride and PcTX venom (FIG. 8C) was due to blockade of ASIC1 subunits. In contrast to acid incubation, 1 hr treatment of ASIC1^−/−neurons with 1 mM NMDA+10 μM glycine (in Mg²⁺-free [pH 7.4] ECF) induced 84.8%±1.4% of maximal LDH release at 24 hr (n=4, FIG. 9C), indicating normal response to other cell injury processes.

(f) Modeled Ischemia Enhances Acidosis-Induced Glutamate-Independent Neuronal Injury Via ASICs

As the magnitude of ASIC currents may be potentiated by cellular and neurochemical components of brain ischemia-cell swelling, arachidonic acid, and lactate and, more importantly, the desensitization of ASIC currents may be reduced dramatically by modeled ischemia (see FIGS. 5A and 5C), activation of ASICs in ischemic conditions is expected to produce greater neuronal injury. To test this hypothesis, neurons were subjected to 1 hr acid treatment under oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD). MK801, CNQX, and nimodipine were added to all solutions to inhibit voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels and glutamate receptor-mediated cell injury associated with OGD. One hour incubation with pH 7.4 ECF under OGD conditions induced only 27.1%±3.5% of maximal LDH release at 24 hr (n=5, FIG. 9D). This finding is in agreement with a previous report that 1 hr OGD does not induce substantial cell injury with the blockade of glutamate receptors and voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels (Aarts et al., 2003). However, 1 hr OGD, combined with acidosis (pH 6.0), induced 73.9%±4.3% of maximal LDH release (n=5, FIG. 9D, p<0.01), significantly larger than acid-induced LDH release in the absence of OGD (see FIG. 8A, p<0.05). Addition of the ASIC1a blocker PcTX venom (100 ng/mL) significantly reduced acid/OGD-induced LDH release to 44.3%±5.3% (n=5, p<0.05, FIG. 9D).

The same experiment was performed with cultured neurons from the ASIC1^−/− mice. Unlike in ASICI containing neurons, however, 1 hr treatment with combined OGD and acid only slightly increased LDH release in ASIC1^−/−neurons (from 26.1%±2.7% to 30.4%±3.5%, N=10-12, FIG. 9D). This finding suggests that potentiation of acid-induced injury by OGD may be due largely to OGD potentiation of ASIC1-mediated toxicity.

It has been demonstrated that activation of a Ca²⁺-permeable nonselective cation conductance activated by reactive oxygen/nitrogen species resulting in glutamate receptor-independent neuronal injury (Aarts et al, Cell, 2003, 115:863-877). The prolonged OGD-induced cell injury may be reduced dramatically by agents either scavenging free radicals directly (e.g., trolox) or reducing the production of free radicals (e.g., L-NAME). To determine whether combined short duration OGD and acidosis induced neuronal injury may involve a similar mechanism, the effect of trolox and L-NAME on OGD/acid-induced LDH release was tested. As shown in FIG. 9D, neither trolox (500 μM) nor L-NAME (300 μM) had significant effect on combined 1 hr OGD/acidosis-induced neuronal injury (n=8-11). Additional experiments also demonstrated that the ASIC blockers amiloride and PcTX venom had no effect on the conductance of TRPM7 channels (Aarts et al. supra). Together, these findings strongly suggest that activation of ASICs but not TRPM7 channels may be largely responsible for combined 1 hr OGD/acidosis-induced neuronal injury in our studies.

(g) Activation of ASIC1a in Ischemic Brain Injury In Vivo

FIG. 10 shows data illustrating neuroprotection by ASICI blockade and ASICI gene knockout in brain ischemia in vivo. FIG. 10A shows a graph of exemplary data obtained from TTC-stained brain sections illustrating the stained volume (“infarct volume”) in brains from aCSF (n=7), amiloride (n=11), or PcTX venom (n=5) injected rats. *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 compared with aCSF injected group. FIG. 10B shows a graph of exemplary data illustrating reduction in infarct volume in brains from ASIC1^−/−mice (n=6 for each group). *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 compared with +/+ group. FIG. 10C shows a graph of exemplary data illustrating reduction in infarct volume in brains from mice i.p. injected with 10 mg/kg memantine (Mem) or i.p. injection of memantine accompanied by i.c.v. injection of PcTX venom (500 ng/mL). **p<0.01 compared with aCSF injection and between memantine and memantine plus PcTX venom (n=5 in each group). FIG. 10D shows a graph of exemplary data illustrating reduction in infarct volume in brains from either ASIC1^+/+ (wt) or ASIC1^−/−mice i.p. injected with memantine (n=5 in each group). *p<0.05, and **p<0.01.

The protective effect of amiloride and PcTX venom in a rat model of transient focal ischemia (Longa et al., Stroke, 1989, 20:84-91) was tested to determine whether activation of ASIC1a is involved in ischemic brain injury in vivo. Ischemia (100 min) was induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). A total of 6 μl artificial CSF (aCSF) alone, aCSF-containing amiloride (1 mM), or PcTX venom (500 ng/mL) was injected intracerebroventricularly 30 min before and after the ischemia. The volume for cerebral ventricular and spinal cord fluid for 4-week-old rats is estimated to be ˜60 μl. Assuming that the infused amiloride and PcTX were uniformly distributed in the CSF, a concentration of ˜100 μM for amiloride and ˜50 ng/mL for PcTX were expected, which is a concentration found effective in cell culture experiments. Infarct volume was determined by TTC staining (Bederson et al., Stroke, 1986, 17:1304-1308) at 24 hr following ischemia. Ischemia (100 min) produced an infarct volume of 329.5±25.6 mm³in aCSF-injected rats (n=7) but only 229.7±41.1 mm³in amiloride-injected (n=11, p<0.05) and 130.4±55.0 mm³(˜60% reduction) in PcTX venom-injected rats (n=5, p<0.01) (FIG. 10A).

ASIC1^−/− mice were used to further demonstrate the involvement of ASIC1a in ischemic brain injury in vivo. Male ASIC1^+/+, ASIC1^+/−, and ASIC1^−/−mice (˜25 g, with congenic C57B16 background) were subjected to 60 min MCAO as previously described (Stenzel-Poore et al., Lancet, 2003, 362:1028-1037). Consistent with the protection by pharmacological blockade of ASIC1a (above), −/− mice displayed significantly smaller (˜61% reduction) infarct volumes (32.9±4.7 mm³, N=6) as compared to +/+ mice (84.6±10.6 mm³, N=6, p<0.01). +/− mice also showed reduced infarct volume (56.9±6.7 mm³, N=6, p<0.05) (FIG. 10B).

To determine whether blockade of ASIC1a channels or knockout of the ASIC1 gene would provide additional protection in vivo in the setting of glutamate receptor blockade, memantine (10 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) into C57B16 mice immediately following 60 min MCAO and accompanied by intracerebroventricular injection (i.c.v.) of a total volume of 0.4 μl aCSF alone or aCSF containing PcTX venom (500 ng/mL) 15 min before and following ischemia. In control mice with i.p. injection of saline and i.c.v. injection of aCSF, 60 min MCAO induced an infarct volume of 123.6±5.3 mm³(n=5, FIG. 10C). In mice with intraperitoneal injection of memantine and intracerebroventricular injection of aCSF, the same duration of ischemia induced an infarct volume of 73.8.+−0.6.9 mm³(n=5, p<0.01). However, in mice injected with memantine and PcTX venom, an infarct volume of only 47.0±1.1 mm³was induced (n=5, p<0.01 compared with both control and memantine groups, FIG. 10C). These data suggest that blockade of homomeric ASIC1a may provide additional protection in in vivo ischemia in the setting of NMDA receptor blockade. Additional protection was also observed in ASIC1^−/− mice treated with pharmacologic NMDA blockade (FIG. 10D). In ASIC^+/+ mice i.p. injected with saline or 10 mg/kg memantine, 60 min MCAO induced an infarct volume of 101.4±9.4 mm³or 61.6±12.7 mm³, respectively (n=5 in each group, FIG. 10D). However, in ASIC1^−/− mice injected with memantine, the same ischemia duration induced an infarct volume of 27.7±1.6 mm³(n=5), significantly smaller than the infarct volume in ASIC1^+/+ mice injected with memantine (p<0.05).

Taken together, these data demonstrate that activation of Ca²⁺-permeable ASIC1a is a novel, glutamate-independent biological mechanism underlying ischemic brain injury.

Example 2: Time Window of PcTX Neuroprotection

This example describes exemplary experiments that measure the neuroprotective effect of PcTX venom at different times after onset of stroke in rodents; see FIG. 11. Briefly, brain ischemia (stroke) was induced in rodents by mid-cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). At the indicated times after induction, artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), PcTX venom (0.5 μL, 500 ng/mL total protein), or inactivated (boiled) venom was infused into the lateral ventricles of each rodent. As shown in FIG. 11, administration of PcTX venom provided a 60% reduction in stroke volume both at one hour and at three hours after stroke onset. Furthermore, substantial stroke volume reduction still may be maintained if treatment is withheld for five hours after the onset of the MCAO. Accordingly, neuroprotection due to ASIC inhibition may have an extended therapeutic time window after stroke onset, allowing stroke subjects to benefit from treatment performed hours after the stroke began. This effect of ASIC blockade on stroke neuroprotection is far more robust than that of calcium channel blockade of the NMDA receptor (a major target for experimental stroke therapeutics) using a glutamate antagonist. No glutamate antagonist, thus far, has such a favorable profile as shown here for ASIC1a-selective inhibition.

Example 3: Exemplary Cystine Knot Peptides

This example describes exemplary cystine knot peptides, including full-length PcTx1 and deletion derivatives of PcTx, which may be screened in cultured cells, tested in ischemic animals (e.g., rodents such as mice or rats), and/or administered to ischemic human subjects.

FIG. 12 shows the primary amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO:1), in one-letter code, of an exemplary cystine knot peptide, PcTx1, indicated at 50, with various exemplary peptide features shown relative to amino acid positions 1-40. Peptide 50 may include six cysteine residues that form cystine bonds 52, 54, 56 to create a cystine knot motif 58. The peptide also may include one or more beta sheet regions 60 and a positively charged region 62. An N-terminal region 64 and a C-terminal region 66 may flank the cystine knot motif.

FIG. 13 shows a comparison of the PcTx1 peptide 50 of FIG. 12 aligned with various exemplary deletion derivatives of the peptide. These derivatives may include an N-terminal deletion 70 (SEQ ID NO:2), a partial C-terminal deletion 72 (SEQ ID NO:3), a full C-terminal deletion 74 (SEQ ID NO:4), and an N/C terminal deletion 76 (SEQ ID NO:5). Other derivatives of PcTx1 may include any deletion, insertion, or substitution of one or more amino acids, for example, while maintaining sequence similarity or identity of at least about 25% or about 50% with the original PcTx1 sequence.

Each PcTx1 derivative may be tested for its ability to inhibit ASIC proteins selectively and/or for an effect, if any, on ischemia. Any suitable test system(s) may be used to perform this testing including any of the cell-based assay systems and/or animal model systems described elsewhere in the present teachings. The PcTx1 derivative also or alternatively may be tested in ischemic human subjects.

Example 4: Selectivity of PcTX Venom for ASIC1a

This example describes experiments that measure the selectivity of PcTX venom (and thus PcTx1 toxin) for ASIC1a alone, relative to other ASIC proteins or combinations of ASIC proteins expressed in cultured cells. COS-7 cells expressing the indicated ASIC proteins were treated with PcTX venom (25 ng/mL on ASIC1a expressing cells and 500 ng/mL on ASIC2a, ASIC3 or ASIC1a+2a expressing cells). Channel currents were measured at the pH of half maximal channel activation (pH 0.5). As shown in FIG. 14, PcTX venom largely blocked the currents mediated by ASIC1a homomeric channels at a protein concentration of 25 ng/mL, with no effect on the currents mediated by homomeric ASIC2a, ASIC3, or heteromeric ASIC1a/ASIC2a at 500 ng/mL (n=3-6). At 500 ng/mL, PcTX venom also did not affect the currents mediated by other ligand-gated channels (e.g. NMDA and GABA receptor-gated channels) and voltage-gated channels (e.g. Na+, Ca2+, and K+ channels) (n=4-5). These experiments indicate that PcTX venom and thus PcTx1 peptide is a specific blocker for homomeric ASIC1a. Using this cell-based assay system, the potency and selectivity of ASIC inhibition may be measured for various synthetic peptides or other candidate inhibitors (e.g., see Example 3).

Example 5: Nasal Administration of PcTX Venom is Neuroprotective

This example describes exemplary data indicating the efficacy of nasally administered PcTX venom for reducing ischemia-induced injury in an animal model system of stroke. Cerebral ischemia was induced in male mice by mid-cerebral artery occlusion. One hour after occlusion was initiated animals were treated as controls or were treated with PcTX venom (50 μL of 5 ng/mL (total protein) PcTx venom introduced intranasally). As shown in FIG. 15, nasal administration of PcTX venom resulted in a 55% reduction in ischemia-induced injury (ischemic damage), as defined by infarct volume, relative to control treatment. Nasal administration may be via a spray that is deposited substantially in the nasal passages rather than inhaled into the lungs and/or may be via an aerosol that is at least partially inhaled into the lungs. In some examples, nasal administration may have a number of advantages over other routes of administration, such as more efficient delivery to the brain and/or adaptability for self-administration by an ischemic subject.

Example 6: Inhibition of ASIC1a Channel By Amiloride And Amiloride Analogs

As shown in FIG. 16, amiloride and amiloride analogs benzamil, phenamil and EIPA block ASIC1a current in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, amiloride and amiloride analogs benzamil and EIPA block ASIC2a current in a dose-dependent manner (FIG. 17). Table 1 summarizes inhibition of the ASIC1a channel by amiloride and amiloride analogs. Amiloride was an effective blocker of this channel with an IC₅₀of 7.7 μM.

TABLE 1

Inhibition of the ASIC1a channel by amiloride and amiloride analogs.

Knockout 1a
39.1 ± 3.8
(n = 4)

Knockout 2a
5.14 ± 0.79
(n = 5)

Neuron (−60 mV)
43.3 ± 1.43
(n = 6)
EIPA

Neuron (−20 mV)
32.2 ± 6.3
(n = 3)

CHO 1a
111 ± 30
(n = 5)

CHO 2a
31
(n = 1)

Knockout 1a
35.9 ± 2.1
(n = 5)

Knockout 2a
20.1 ± 2.2
(n = 2)

Neuron (−60 mV)
82.9 ± 5.2
(n = 8)
Bepridil

Neuron (−60 mV)
100 ± 11
(n = 10)
KB-R7943

Neuron (−60 mV)
24.3 ± 17.2
(n = 2)
5-(N-Methyl-N-isobutyl)-amiloride

Neuron (−60 mV)
15.0 ± 11.7
(n = 3)
5-(N,N-hexamethylene)amiloride

Neuron (−60 mV)
14.8 ± 7.1
(n = 2)
5-(N,N-Dimenthyl)amiloride hydrochloride

Example 7: Reduction of Infarct Volume in Mice by Intracerebroventricular Injection of Amiloride and Amiloride Analogs

Mice were subjected to 60 minutes of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) as described above. Amiloride or an amiloride analog benzamil, bepridel, EIPA or KB-R7943 was administered by intracerebroventricular injection one hour after MCAO. The animals were evaluated one day after ischemia induction. As shown in FIG. 18, intracerebroventricular injection of amiloride or an amiloride analog benzamil, bepridel, EIPA or KB-R7943 effectively reduce infarct volume.

Example 8: Reduction of Infarct Volume in Mice by Intravenous Injection of Amiloride

Mice were subjected to 60 minutes of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) as described above. Amiloride was administered by intravenous injection 1, 3 or 5 hours after MCAO. The animals were evaluated one day after ischemia induction. As shown in FIG. 19, intravenous injection of amiloride effectively reduce infarct volume. The effective CNS penetration of amiloride may be explained by the fact that blood-brain-barrier is compromised following brain ischemia/reperfusion. FIG. 20 shows that intravenous injection of amiloride has a prolonged therapeutic window of 5 h.

Example 9: Structure Activity Relationships for Hydrophobic Amiloride Analogs on Various Channels

As shown in Table 1, substituting the C-5 amino group in amiloride with alkyl groups led to a decrease in potency at the ASIC1a channel. The same substitution increases potency to the ASIC3 channel (Kuduk et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2009, 19:2514-2518). The reverse result was obtained when substituting hydrophobic groups onto the guanidino part of the structure. Indeed, the benzyl substituted guanidino analog, benzamil, was the most potent ASIC1a blocking compound tested (IC50=4.9 μM). Taken together, these results showed that amiloride is an effective blocker of ASUCla with an IC₅₀of 7.7 μM. They also provide structure activity relationships (see FIG. 21) for designing amiloride analogs that would inhibit the ASIC1a channel. Accordingly, in some embodiments, amiloride analogs are generated by introducing changes in the guanidine portion of the amiloride structure. Since amiloride is only a very weak inhibitor of the Na⁺/Ca²⁺ion exchanger (IC₅₀=1.1 mM). The amiloride analogs are likely be a very weak inhibitor of the Na⁺/Ca²⁺ion exchanger as well. In some embodiments, the amiloride analogs are designed to have increased selectivity for ASIC1a over the ASIC3 channel. In other embodiments, a ring structure, such as a cyclic guanidine group, is introduced into the amiloride structure to increase inhibitory potency of ASIC1a currents. It is also possible that one or more of the N—H groups of amiloride will form H-bonds either internally with the 3-amino group or with the ion channel.

The in vivo results in mice showed that efficacy can be achieved with a plasma concentration of 32.5 μM (iv dose of 50 μl×1 mM) and a total brain concentration of 12.5 μM (icy dose of 1 μl×500 μM). It is thus estimated that only a 10-fold increase in potency is necessary to achieve efficacious concentrations that are suitable for an acute therapeutic for stroke in humans. Therefore, novel analogs are screened for an increased ASIC1a IC₅₀potency from the 4 to 8 μM for amiloride and benzamil to <1 μM.

In some embodiments, the amiloride analogs comprise methylated analogs of benzamil (formula 1-5 of FIG. 21) and amidino analog of benzamil (formula 6 of FIG. 21). In other embodiments, the amiloride analogs contain a ring formed on the guanidine group. In other embodiments, the amiloride analogs contain an acylguanidino group for increased inhibitory potency of ASIC1a currents.

Amiloride is soluble in water at 1 mM and is effective in treating ischemia in a mouse model at a dose of 50 ul per injection. The equivalent dose on a mg/kg basis in a 65 kg human would be close to 40 mg and require an injection volume of over 160 ml. Similarly benzamil has a reported solubility in 0.9% saline of 0.4 mg/ml (1.7 mM), which permits administration of only 5 mg benzamil dihydrochloride in a 10 ml injection. Accordingly, amiloride analogs with higher water solubility are desired. In some embodiments, the amiloride analogs contain a water solubilizing group, such as an N,N-dimethyl amino group or a sugar, at the guanidino group to improve water solubility. In some embodiments, the amiloride analogs have a water solubility of 5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, 50 mM, 60 mM, 70 mM, 80 mM, 90 mM, 100 mM or higher. In other embodiments, the amiloride analogs have a solubility that allows for a 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg dose to be administered intravenously to a human in a single 10 ml injection. In yet other embodiments, the amiloride analogs have a solubility that allows for a 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg, 400 mg, or 500 mg dose to be administered intracerebroventicularly to a human in a single 2 ml injection.

The disclosure set forth above may encompass one or more distinct inventions, with independent utility. Each of these inventions has been disclosed in its preferred form(s). These preferred forms, including the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein, are not intended to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includes all novel and nonobvious combinations and subcombinations of the various elements, features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein. The following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations regarded as novel and nonobvious. Inventions embodied in other combinations and subcombinations of features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed in applications claiming priority from this or a related application. Such claims, whether directed to a different invention or to the same invention, and whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of the present disclosure.