FIELD OF INVENTION AND PARTIES INVOLVED

The idea for this patent began to evolve in January, 2011 during family discussions. Our focus was to find a way to reduce football players' head and neck injuries. Other sports and activities were also considered as possible recipients of our families approach. During the early months of 2015 a new approach was presented by my grandson Joshua A. Blecherman, leading to the current embodiment. There were no previous submittals.

BACKGROUND

The high incidence of head and neck injuries in football continues to exact a high price on the health and well-being of high school, college and professional players. Similar head and neck injuries are noteworthy in other sports, such as skiing. In the prior art (FIG. 1) the player wears a heavy padded helmet. Although the helmet is well padded, high levels of impact to the head continue to result in blunt force trauma, whiplash and high levels of neck strain at all age levels of football participation. These injuries also have had long term effects on aging football players.

The proposed embodiment can significantly reduce these injuries by means of an improved helmet and helmet extension design and energy absorption system that will reduce head and neck trauma without restricting player visibility or head position. This embodiment incorporates an extension at the rear center of the helmet which is coupled to a shoulder harness or existing football type shoulder pads. There are four principle components to the design: The fixed-in-place helmet and extension which does not contact the head; the shock absorbing cap worn by the player; the shoulder pads or shoulder harness; and the connecting bracket mechanically attached to the rear top of the shoulder pads. The embodiment will provide an energy absorption/redistribution-shape-recoverable system which limits head deflection upon impact. The helmet extension is designed to reduce head deflection and absorb impact energy from all directions of force. The embodiment will significantly reduce the whiplash effect of the brain within the skull, reduce blunt force trauma, and also prevent neck injury.

Production-ready materials are available to implement this embodiment. Processional football helmet exteriors are most often fabricated of tough high impact resistant polycarbonate plastic (tensile strength=6,000 psi; modulus=300,000 psi); youth football and safety helmets are constructed of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). These materials have good impact and strength properties and can survive repeated blows without damage. The crown area of some football helmets are constructed of vinyl nitrile. A co-polymer colyene (85% polypropylene/15% polyethylene); (tensile strength=4,000 psi; modulus=195,000 psi) is used to fabricate leg braces and prosthetics. All these materials are readily available, easily formable and have good impact resistance, tensile/flexure strength, and modulus properties over a wide range. These materials can be analytically screened for effective performance using three dimensional finite element analysis for the embodiment described and the best candidates would be further evaluated in laboratory prototype impact testing.

SUMMARY

The proposed embodiment of the design, to prevent brain and neck injuries to the wearer, will include a modified football type helmet, not contacting the wearer's head. This design will provide unlimited visibility when the head is turned inside the fixed position helmet in any direction. The player's head, wearing a shock absorbing cap, will be free to move in all directions. The helmet will feature a semi-rigid straight member extending from the rear bottom center of the helmet. This extension will be connected to a bracket at the rear top center of a shoulder pad or shoulder harness. Unlike current helmet designs the helmet does not contact the head at any point. The helmet extension will be fixed in place by a bracket mechanically attached to the top rear center of the shoulder pad so that all of the helmet and extension weight are borne by the shoulder pads. The bottom of the helmet extension will have several horizontal helmet height adjustment slots. The helmet and extension will be fixed in place with an easily insertable and removable locking pin.

Force to the helmet, during impact, will be distributed into the shock absorbing cap and into the semi-rigid, load-compliant, extension at the back of the helmet and then into the body of the wearer through the shoulder pads. The rigidity of the helmet and extension and load sharing/distribution of force into the shoulder pads will significantly reduce head deflection and increase energy absorption during impact. This in turn will reduce whiplash and blunt force trauma and limit neck extension.

The helmet extension will be shaped and designed specifically to provide for variations in limited flexure (side-to-side, or fore-to-aft bending) upon impact, and full recovery of shape after impact, very much like a spring. The helmet extension design will be rigid and unyielding to tensile or compressive forces. Any number of helmet extension materials may be candidates where their mechanical properties have been validated in varied sports and prosthetic applications.

Three dimensional finite element analysis followed by laboratory prototype impact testing of material candidates with varying helmet extension width-to-thickness ratios would identify the ideal helmet extension design for the range of player size, from little league to professional football, and for different sports.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is the side and rear views of the prior art helmet configuration.

FIGS. 2 and 3 are the side and rear views of the proposed increased visibility, modified football helmet, shock absorbing cap and helmet rear center extension into the shoulder pad bracket.

FIG. 4 is the side view showing 180 degrees of rotation of the rectangular ribbon-shaped helmet extension.

FIG. 4A shows side cross sectional views through 180 degrees of rotation of the rectangular ribbon-shaped helmet extension.

FIG. 5 is the rear view showing 180 degrees of rotation of the rectangular ribbon-shaped helmet extension.

FIG. 5A shows rear cross sectional views through 180 degrees of rotation of the rectangular ribbon-shaped helmet extension.

FIG. 6 is the shoulder pad attachment bracket showing the locking-pin prior to loading.

FIG. 7 shows the mid-plane section of the shoulder pad bracket with pin quick-lock-and-release features.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 shows the side and rear views of the prior helmet design. Most helmets are manufactured by injection or compression molding polycarbonate and other plastics which have good impact resistance and high tensile and modulus properties.

FIGS. 2 and 3 show the side and rear views of the open area helmet 1 and the helmet rear extension 2, a shock absorbing head cap 3, the cap retaining straps and chin strap 4, a very small space between the wearer's cap and the inside surface of the helmet 5, and one form of traditional face mask protection 6. The helmet extension is of sufficient length to engage a bracket 7 which is mechanically attached to the rear top center of the shoulder pads 8. The locking pin 9 will secure the helmet extension in the bracket and fix the appropriate helmet height for the wearer. Impact force to the head or neck will be transmitted to the shock absorbing cap 3 and into the helmet extension 2 simultaneously and then into the shoulder pads 8. The helmet front and side areas have been opened up to allow full visibility, as the head is turned, in any direction. The wearers' shock absorbing cap 3, in the gap between the fixed-in-position helmet and the skull, can utilize any of the currently available materials. These shock absorbing and energy transferring materials include solids such as elastomers or more firm urethanes, or liquid or gas filled containers. These materials can be employed separately or integrated into different sections of the helmet liner cap. The fitted cap, with a low coefficient of friction top surface, allows the head to turn without restriction and is held in place by straps connected to a chin pad 4. The helmet 1 is fixed and does not move as the wearer turns his head. The helmet extension 2 originates at the rear bottom center of the helmet and, if a polymer, may be injection, compression or transfer molded as one part. The extension may also be made of other materials such as metal alloys, composite metal alloys or polymer composite alloys and mechanically attached to the bottom of the helmet.

The helmet extension design, FIGS. 2 and 3, show the rectangular shaped ribbon viewed from the side of the helmet 10 and from the rear 11, respectively. The helmet extension ribbon 2 undergoes a 180 degree smooth continuous turn from its origin at the bottom of the helmet to its termination site, the bracket at the rear top center of the shoulder pad 7. There are multiple advantages for this design. Regardless of the direction of impact to the helmet, the helmet extension ribbon feature will have a region along the ribbon where the maximum section modulus (resistance to bending) faces the direction of impact. In addition, the impact point on a curved surface helmet will, in almost all instances, change as the impacting body's force follows through. Therefore, new force points are continually engaging new adjacent section moduli locations on the helmet extension ribbon. This sequential multiple section modulus engagement results in attenuating the initial impact force through the extension 2 and into the bracket 7 on the shoulder pads. An additional geometric variable in the ribbon which can provide a benefit to this design are centerline circular holes 12 in the ribbon. The holes, if incorporated, will reduce the local flexure section modulus thereby permitting the wearer to tilt his head to the left or right (wearers can always rotate their heads) while not significantly detracting from the force attenuation benefits derived from the ribbon design. The number and size of holes, are another variable that require evaluation in a three dimensional analytical finite element evaluation and proof of concept in a laboratory prototype helmet extension program. The maximum diameter of any hole should not be greater than 50% of the width of the extension ribbon; holes may be smaller. The frequency of holes will also be determined by analysis and testing and will vary depending on the needs of the wearers' size.

Testing of prototype extension designs in the laboratory, of varying width-to-thickness ratio ribbons, will define the degree of flexure and recovery for different intensity levels and impact directions. The desirable result will be to obtain proportionally increased helmet extension (ribbon) deflection at increased loads and then full recovery of helmet extension shape and dimension. In mechanical engineering terms this means that maximum deflection of the helmet extension, from expected maximum forces on the assembled design, will not exceed the flexure strength, or the flexure or section modulus of the material with appropriate safety factors considered. Polymer candidate materials were defined earlier. In addition to material properties influencing the design there are any number of rectangular ribbon width (w)-to-thickness (t) ratios that could satisfy the design. Although the rectangular ribbon shape is illustrated in this embodiment, it is also expected that modulus and flexure strength requirements can also be met as the rectangular ribbon dimensions approach a square (w=t) or rod configuration. Also shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, at the bottom of the helmet extension, is one of several typical engagement slots 13 that permit the extension to be retained by the shoulder pad bracket for helmet height adjustment.

FIG. 6 shows the rear view of the helmet extension 2 fitted into the bracket 7 at the rear top center of the shoulder pads 8. The bracket is attached to the shoulder pads by conventional mechanical means such as bolts or rivets; typical bolt holes and location for attachment are shown 12. Also shown is the bracket pin 9, in the loading position, prior to entering the bracket.

FIG. 7 shows the centerline section of the bracket 7 with a more detailed illustration of the rectangular pin 9 with snap-in lock features and bracket-slot contours 13 facilitating easy engagement and rapid removal. Also shown are height adjustable slots 11 in the bottom section of the helmet extension.