This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/832,748 filed on Apr. 27, 2004, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The subject invention relates to methods of observing protein crystals so as to distinguish such crystals from other materials within a test sample as well as to obtain a vivid and precise image of the protein crystalline material of interest.

2. Background Information

In scientific studies of the three-dimensional atomic structure of biological macromolecules, X-ray or other diffraction experiments are extensively and widely used. These methods require the regular array of replicate molecules presented by highly ordered crystalline states of matter. Often great effort is expended in finding or screening conditions suitable for forming, growing, and harvesting crystals of sufficient size and quality. Further, the structure and mode of binding of a ligand to its target are often derived from the data.

In the area of drug discovery research, many ligand structures are desired in order to optimize and guide iterative medicinal chemistry synthesis toward achieving the binding properties desired for a drug molecule. For pharmacological reasons, the target of many drugs is a protein molecule so a large fraction of X-ray crystallography research in drug discovery is performed on crystals of proteins (see Anderson et al., Chem. Biol. 10 (9):787-97 (2003)). Interest and effort are increasing in the attempt to obtain structures of membrane-bound proteins such as cell receptors.

Lacking direct molecular control to build a crystal at the molecular level, scientists rely on large numbers of tests to find conditions where a concentration or other gradient, such as those induced by vapor diffusion, will allow or drive a crystal to form. Such a crystal, or at least a zone within the crystal, must be solid, large enough, and relatively free of defects for it to yield good X-ray diffraction data. If a particular crystal growth test is successful, the location, size or form of the crystal is unpredictable (see McPherson et al., Structure 3:759-68 (1995)). Multiple crystals can form as well causing additional difficulties. Steps of adding crystal seeds or presenting crystal-inducing surfaces have been used but are not universally applicable.

Unfortunately, in the solutions and solution mixtures used to promote the formation or growth of a crystalline phase of a target macromolecule, very often other undesired solid material can form whose composition is unknown and can obscure or distract in the identification of crystals actually worthy of X-ray diffraction experiments (see McPherson, A., Preparation and Analysis of Protein Crystals, 1982, Krieger Publishing Co., Inc., Malabar, Fla., pp. 179-180). Salt, detergent, polyethylene glycol, lipids or other excipients can also form crystals (or precipitate). Some of these can have similar morphology or outwardly resemble the desired crystals. Amorphous precipitates, liquid phase separations or skins on droplets are also occasionally observed. These may be composed of, or include, protein to some degree. Therefore, with such a plethora of possibilities it becomes important to be able to monitor and identify protein crystals in such crystallization attempts, usually performed in multiple sites or chambers.

At the present time, 96-chamber plastic plates have gained popularity as a sample format for screening large numbers of crystallization trials. Using these plates, in the vapor diffusion method of crystallization, a protein solution is confined as a sitting droplet by a well. Crystals are relatively small and can form at various locations within the well. A basin below contains the reservoir liquid that slowly adjusts through vapor diffusion the protein solution droplet's concentration in crystallizing agents. Another well-known format used extensively in the past is to hang a droplet from a cover over the reservoir.

Existing methods of microscopy of materials have limitations in their application to these types of samples. Phase, birefringence, retardance, crossed-polarizer or other contrast methods using visible light and, for example, exploiting the difference in index of refraction between protein crystal and solution, may not be conclusive enough alone to allow convenient or rapid scoring of crystallization attempts. Cross polarization for example, uses the anisotropic nature of crystalline materials to refract light and produce birefringence. Birefringent crystals appear as rainbow colored objects against a dark background. Crystals with little structural anisotropy may not be birefringent, for example, the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ (LÃ¶we, J. et al., Nature 391 (6663): 203-6 (1998)). If the isotropic nature of protein crystals that grow from a given sample is not known before screening, the use of birefringence will result in some missed hits. Many organic and inorganic materials present in crystallization screens can also form birefringent crystals that result in false positives.

Absorbance or transmitted light microscopy in the UV for this purpose is difficult in most crystal growth formats. For spectral information, crystals are generally removed and mounted in instruments for examination (Bourgeois, D. et al., J. Appl. Cryst. 35:319 (2002)).

Chemical modification of a protein prior to crystallization (such as attaching a fluorescent probe, see Sumida, J. et al., J. Cryst. Growth 232:308-316 (2001)) in order to more easily visualize its crystals when they form is usually undesirable for the risk of denaturing the protein, or altering its biochemical, e.g. compound-binding, properties in subtle or major ways. The crystallization behavior of the protein may also be unpredictably altered.

In order to recognize protein crystals, dyes can be added to a crystallization well after crystals form that adsorb into or stain protein specifically [www.hamptonresearch.com; http://www.hamptonresearch.com/hrproducts/4710.html]; however, such a process can modify crystals substantially and can alter or abrogate the binding of any drug-like compound under study, and thus is limited to cases where the crystals need not be harvested.

In view of the above, a definite need exists for non-invasive methods that allow one to inspect crystals such that one can distinguish them from other materials in a sample as well as to visualize the crystals precisely.

All U.S. patents and publications referred to herein are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The subject invention encompasses a method of distinguishing a crystal within a biological sample. This method comprises the steps of: a) exposing the biological sample to ultraviolet radiation; b) detecting radiation emission from the exposed biological sample; and c) analyzing the emission of step b) and distinguishing the crystal within the sample by results of the analysis. In particular, in connection with step c), one may analyze the emission of step b) in connection with its intensity, spectral, temporal or other photonic properties. One then distinguishes the crystal by determining whether, over the spatial extent, if any, of the biological sample, the emission has changed somewhere relative to a solution or sample where no crystal is present (such as prior to addition or presence of a crystallization-inducing excipient or immediately after but before a crystal could form), or whether within the boundaries of the biological sample, the variations in the emission properties occur which are greater than those of a solution or sample in which no crystal is present. In this method, the ultraviolet radiation utilized preferably has a wavelength of less than 351 nm, more preferably, between 140 nm and 320 nm and, most preferably between 275 nm and 300 nm. The biological material may be, for example, a protein, a peptide, a cofactor, a nucleic acid, a cell membrane, or a mixture of any one of more of these entities. Further, the radiation emission may result from excitement of luminescence of the crystal by the UV radiation of step a). The luminescence may be intrinsic to the crystal and may be fluorescence (e.g., polarized fluorescence) or phosphorescence.

Further, the present invention includes an additional method of distinguishing a crystal from other matter within a biological sample. This method comprises the steps of: a) exposing the biological sample to UV radiation; b) detecting scattered photons from the exposed biological sample; and c) analyzing the scattered photons of step b) by determining whether 1) the scattered photons of the biological sample have changed in comparison to a sample comprising no crystal or 2) whether variations in the scattered photons of the biological sample are greater than the sample comprising no crystal, the change or variations allowing the crystal to be distinguished from the other matter within the biological sample. Thus, the method described above and this method follow virtually the sample protocol in connection with step c). The scattered photons may be of the Brillouin type and are Raman shifted from an incident wavelength of preferably between 140 nm and 350 nm and, more preferably, between 200 nm and 260 nm. The biological material may be as described above in connection with the other method.

Additionally, the present invention encompasses a method of determining whether a ligand within a crystal has bound to a receptor to the ligand. This method comprises the steps of: a) measuring emission of a crystal, comprising a receptor to the ligand, prior to addition of the ligand; b) adding the ligand to the crystal; c) measuring emission of the crystal subsequent to addition of the ligand; and d) determining whether the ligand has bound to the receptor by comparing the emission of step a) with the emission of step c), a difference in emission between step a) and step c) indicating binding of the ligand to the receptor. The emission may be, luminescence, for example, the result of fluorescence (e.g., polarized fluorescence) or phosphorescence. The scattered light may be Raman shifted.

The present invention also encompasses a method of determining presence of a compound within a â€œdistinguishedâ€ crystal. (In the context of the present invention, the term â€œdistinguishedâ€ means a crystal which has been identified, separated or differentiated (e.g., via visualization or other means) from the other matter within a biological sample, based upon one of the methods described herein.) This method comprises the steps of: a) determining reference UV-excited emission or UV scattered light of the compound for: 1) free compound or 2) free compound and compound bound to a receptor (e.g., in solution); b) measuring the ultraviolet (UV)-exited emission or scattered UV light of a test crystal suspected of containing the compound bound to the receptor; c) comparing the emission of step b) with the reference emission of step a), comparable emission of the compound bound to protein (compared to the test crystal's emission) or deviation in emission from compound free in solution (compared to the test crystal's emission) indicating presence of the compound within the test crystal, and comparable emission with the compound free in solution (compared to the test crystal's emission) or deviation in emission from compound bound to protein (compared to the test crystal's emission) indicating absence of the compound within the test crystal. (Methods of determining comparable or corresponding emission or spectra are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. (See e.g., Handbook of Near-Infrared Analysis, eds., Burns et al., Marcel Dekker; see also Martans et al., Multivariate Calibration, Wiley; Geladi et al., Mulivariate Image Analysis, Wiley; and Lewis et al., Spectroscopy 19 (4):26 (2004).)) Again, the emission may be luminescence, for example, fluorescence (e.g., polarized fluorescence) or phosphorescence, as is possible in connection with all of the methods described herein. Further, the scattered light may be Raman shifted, for example.

Additionally, the present invention includes another method of determining whether, within a distinguished crystal, a ligand has bound to a receptor. This method comprises the steps of:

a) measuring UV-excited emission or UV scattered light of a first crystal and a second crystal, the first crystal comprising the receptor to the ligand and the second crystal comprising the test crystal, the test crystal being suspected of comprising the ligand bound to the receptor; and b) determining whether the ligand has bound to the receptor in the second crystal (i.e., the test crystal) by comparing the emission of the first crystal and the second crystal (i.e., the test crystal) of step a), a difference in emission indicating binding of the ligand to the receptor of the second crystal. The emission may be, for example, luminescence such as fluorescence (e.g., polarized fluorescence) or phosphorescence. Further, the scattered light may be Raman shifted.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates the UV epifluorescence microscope used in the methods of the present invention.

FIG. 2 represents a block diagram of the UV epifluorescence microscope configuration.

FIG. 3 illustrates a straight-through optical configuration, using another rendition of a UV fluorescence microscope in the methods of the present invention.

FIG. 4 includes photographs of the apparatus of FIG. 3, with its straight-through configuration.

FIG. 5 illustrates a Linbro plate for hanging drop crystal growth.

FIG. 6 diagrams one well of a high throughput (96-well) crystallization tray.

FIG. 7 illustrates glucose isomerase crystals visualized by UV fluorescence imaging in epifluorescence.

FIG. 8 shows crystals of chicken egg white lysozyme, viewed with visible light (for comparison) and with intrinsic UV-excited fluorescence using epi-fluorescence geometry.

FIG. 9 shows glucose isomerase crystals viewed with visible light and visualized by UV fluorescence imaging in the straight-through geometry.

FIG. 10 shows crystals of salt, viewed with visible light, but disappearing under the conditions and with the same setup used for viewing intrinsic UV-excited fluorescence of protein crystals.

FIG. 11 shows crystals of salt, together with glucose isomerase, viewed with visible and intrinsic UV-excited fluorescence.

FIG. 12 shows human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B crystals viewed with visible and intrinsic UV-excited fluorescence.

FIG. 13 graphs data for background fluorescence from a collection of buffers used in one of a number of commercial crystallization screens tested for any background fluorescence.

FIG. 14 plots fluorescence excitation spectra for the aromatic side-chain amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan shown with the fluorescence emission spectra for tryptophan (Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 2cd ed., p. 16 (1999)).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods of distinguishing, locating, isolating, differentiating, and/or analyzing crystals of biological macromolecules such as proteins, peptides, cofactors, nucleic acids, cell membranes, or mixed crystals thereof. Such methods may additionally be carried out on such crystals that also contain test compounds or molecules whose structure may result in their use as a potential therapeutic. More specifically, the methods are accomplished by detecting intrinsic fluorescence, phosphorescence or other luminescence excited by UV radiation, or Raman or Brillouin scattering of UV radiation. The crystals are those used for, prior to, or in conjunction with subsequent or related X-ray diffraction experiments for three-dimensional atomic structure determination.

One of the methods of the present invention comprises the steps of: 1) shining UV electromagnetic radiation from a light source onto the sample; 2) detecting the response radiation emission or scattered photons; and 3) finding or otherwise identifying the desired crystals by analyzing the data covering the field of view encompassed by the area where crystals are allowed to or can grow. In particular, the first step of the method is to illuminate the sample with UV radiation at a wavelength, or through a band, where some radiation has a wavelength <351 nm and, more preferably, for the case of exciting protein luminescence, in the range of approximately 275-300 nm. The light source may be continuously emitting, flashing, or modulated. Examples of suitable light sources include deuterium lamps, short-arc lamps and lasers. Any optical components used to direct, collimate, reflect, focus, or which simply pass the excitation light onto the sample, must transmit (or reflect) the UV excitation wavelength in the range <351 nm. For example, the range of approximately 260-320 nm includes the upper wavelength band of absorption of the fluorescent amino acids tyrosine and tryptophan (see FIG. 14; see also Joseph R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 1st edition, New York, Plenum Press (1983), p. 343 and Eugene A. Permyakov, Luminescent Spectroscopy of Proteins, CRC Press, Boca Raton, (1993)).

An additional strong absorption band at higher energy for tryptophan and tyrosine may allow luminescence excitation at lower wavelengths (e.g., <260 nm) with the present methods as long as sufficient transmission of excitation light through and no accidental, overwhelming background fluorescence or other interference from materials and optics is caused. As known from the general knowledge in the field of fluorescence spectroscopy, the fluorescence emission spectrum remains the same due to molecular radiationless relaxation before emission of photons (Lakowicz, ibid., p. 4). For example, phenylalanine excites quite well at wavelengths below 220 nm. Certain buffer constituents may interfere with lower excitation wavelengths by their (or a contaminant's) intrinsic fluorescence as a background, reducing contrast, and crystallization buffer solutions may therefore need to be checked beforehand, or more often, if such shorter excitation wavelengths are employed. If nothing else occurs, the presence of some water vapor and at least nitrogen in the atmosphere surrounding the optics and solutions of the experiment surely will limit luminescence excitation wavelengths to be greater than around 140 nm.

Control of the dose of excitation radiation may be necessary to prevent sample damage, and also provides a means of confirming genuine fluorescence specific to the desired crystal. Some eventual fading of fluorescence is expected, but accidental pick-up of reflections or other stray light should remain relatively constant.

In this method, the glass or anti-reflection coating used in common objective lenses or other focusing lenses is unsuitable. UV transmitting lenses from fused silica (â€œquartzâ€ ) are available. However, many, in fact, most compound microscopes for fluorescent biological samples that are commercially available contain multiple glass elements and do not allow excitation in this range of ultraviolet wavelengths (<351 nm). Biological fluorescence microscopy refers today mostly to work with excitation in the visible range, or near ultraviolet range (commonly at 365 nm (see Walter C. McCrone, Lucy B. McCrone, John Gustav Delly, Polarized Light Microscopy, McCrone Research Institute, Chicago, Ill. (1985)), or 351 nm for confocal UV laser scanning microscopy) of the electromagnetic spectrum and often involves use of purpose-specific dyes or visibly fluorescent proteins (e.g., green fluorescent protein, GFP), incorporated or conjugated to proteins or other molecules in some way, rather than the intrinsic UV-excited fluorescence of proteins, nucleic acids, NADH, or other common biological constituents.

In the methods of the present invention, covers of the sample containers used to prevent evaporation of the solution are usually made of materials such as glass or plastic. However, other materials may also be utilized. These thin sheets or coverslips can pass the excitation light to a sufficient degree to allow the present methods of the invention to work successfully. Plastics used in the sample container floor or its frame do not fluoresce much under conditions used for detecting protein fluorescence. Also, buffers and excipients used to favor the formation of protein crystals fluoresce only to a limited degree, producing less than 30% background with respect to the level expected for typical protein fluorescence. In one 96-position screen that is used as a sparse matrix for high throughput, only three conditions stood out to that degree (see FIG. 13). PMME, polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether, was contained in two of these (Jancarik et al., Cryst. 24:409-411 (1991)). Again, this fluorescence is still small compared to that of protein in crystals.

The second step of the present methods is the detection of the sample response at a longer wavelength than that of the excitation (or conceivably, at a shorter wavelength, in particular, for the case of anti-Stokes Raman scattering). These luminescence or scattered light emissions are usually isotropic in space at least to some degree so collection geometry is often mostly dictated by the sample format, and it was demonstrated, for example, that epifluorescence through the objective lens above the sample works well (see FIG. 2). A straight-through configuration with excitation through the top and observation from the bottom is also feasible and was demonstrated (see FIGS. 3 and 4). Detection can be continuous, synchronous, gain-modulated, gated, or delayed relative to excitation events. Suitable detectors include, for example, CCD (charged coupled device) linear or two-dimensional arrays, photodiodes and photodiode arrays, avalanche photodiodes, photo (electron) multiplier tubes (PMT), multiple anode PMT's, microchannel plates, and microchannel plate intensified CCD detectors. Typically, it is necessary to use an optical spectral or possibly also a polarization filter to block transmitted, reflected, scattered or otherwise back- or forward-coupled excitation light from impinging on the detector. When protein fluorescence is viewed, the band of emission extends from 320 to 400 nm (see FIG. 14). Phosphorescence extends yet farther into the visible. Raman scattering is found in bands shifted in terms of energy from the incident light (typically a laser line) and bands specific to protein vibrational group frequencies are known, for example, amide I at approximately 1650 cm^âˆ’1.

The use of additional wavelength discriminating optical elements may also be desirable in order to select part of the emission. For example, the spectral characteristics of protein intrinsic fluorescence emission indicate the immediate molecular electronic environment of the fluorescent amino acids. An additional benefit of the methods of the present invention is to allow analysis of the emission spectrum for a number of features. A correlation of protein crystal's emission spectral characteristics with its X-ray diffraction has been shown. (Asanov et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 232:603 (2001)). Furthermore, if a ligand binds, there can be a consequent direct proximal, semi-proximal or allosteric electronic environment change for the fluorescent amino acids, and in any case there is the possibility of a spectral or quantum yield change due to energy or photon transfer, e.g. FÃ¶rster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). By monitoring emission intensity at particular wavelengths before and after, with or without compound present, this effect may be used as a convenient means to verify the presence and binding of a ligand in the crystal prior to an X-ray diffraction experiment. Alignment of fluorophores in a crystal can bring about distinctive orientational and polarization effects, as observed for GFP in the visible range (InouÃ© et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 99:4272 (2002)). Thus, the utility of monitoring these effects for indication of quality and prediction of degree of diffraction for the planned X-ray crystallography may be envisioned. Temporal discrimination (i.e., delay of the detection time window relative to excitation) may also be desirable. For example, measuring or imaging fluorescence lifetime (FLIM) may allow a protein-specific signature to be detected independent of overall intensity level. Phosphorescence is considerably delayed relative to fluorescence and can also provide a unique chemical signature.

Additionally, drug or drug-like test compounds themselves can show interesting changes in their own fluorescence upon binding, so monitoring their specific emission excited at appropriate wavelengths may be useful (see, for example, urokinase naphthamadine inhibitor series; International Patent Application Publication No. WO 99/05096, unpublished results). Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy in the visible range has been used to show binding of compounds (Dong et al., Biochemistry 40 (33):9751-9757 (2001)), and in the UV range, a resonance enhancement due to an incident beam's wavelength being near the absorption bands will deliver a sensitivity advantage. The wavelengths used for this benefit are in the range have been 200-260 nm (Sanford Asher, Analytical Chemistry 65 (4), 201 A (1993)), but other incident wavelengths may be possible as long as the desired Raman signature does not fall in a range where considerable fluorescence or other luminescence is present. Brillouin scattering, with characteristic shifts lower in frequency magnitude than Raman, results from intermolecular vibrations such as those of lattice modes of a crystal (a.k.a. phonons) and could correlate with crystal quality and suitability for X-ray diffraction experiments.

The third step of the methods of the present invention is the accommodation of the physical format used to grow or confine crystals by collecting the emission response in such a way as to take one or more readings, for example, to capture an image of the sample optically or by moving or scanning the sample (or excitation light) through its extent point-by-point, by sections, or in a raster pattern, or in some other way, possibly but not necessarily processing these data so as to form an image. It may be that line or pattern scans which collect a subset of the image are sufficient for rapid scoring of a well for presence or absence of crystals. Within these data, bright objects will correspond to the desired crystals. This step allows the methods to be used in situ, that is, without harvesting or displacing any crystal, unlike in a UV intrinsic fluorescence method of prior art ((Asanov et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 232:603 (2001)).

In some methods of crystallization where attractive zones or even simple solution confinement force or induce crystals to form at specific locations on a surface, sensing an increase in protein fluorescence near the surface is indicative of the formation of the crystal because a crystal's protein concentration is always higher than that of the corresponding mother solution. For this special case of detecting crystal formation, our method of detecting crystals by a protein's intrinsic luminescence can be employed, if necessary, with only a single-element detector and fixed confocal detection optics because there is no requirement for capturing an image or multiple readings at different points in the sample.

One embodiment of the present invention involves the use of a 2-D CCD detector to collect the UV-excited fluorescence image of a significant fraction of the crystal growth area, e.g., â€œthe wellâ€ (see FIGS. 5 & 6). Using this method, protein crystals are recognizable in a wide-field epifluorescence or straight-through fluorescence image by their intrinsic fluorescence emission which is much brighter than that from residual protein in surrounding solution (e.g., see FIG. 7). For this particular test, as shown in FIG. 2, a 20 nm band centered at 280 nm was excited and emission was collected in a 40 nm band centered at 360 nm. Furthermore, under these conditions, salt crystals, as predicted by considering their chemical constitution, did not produce any luminescence, and appeared as dark objects (see FIGS. 10 and 11).

By moving the focus, data can also be collected through the depth dimension of the protein solution droplet. It is well known that three-dimensional data can also be reconstructed using a confocal optical microscope rendition. Confocal imaging techniques include, for example, laser scanning, Nipkow spinning disk, and dual spinning disk.

Even crystals that have already been harvested, for example, suspended somewhere inside a drop confined by a nylon fiber loop, are small enough that they need still to be located and placed precisely using a goniometer relative to the X-ray source when they are mounted on a diffractometer, in order to maximize or optimize the diffraction intensity and pattern. Due to similar lack of optical contrast like that observed in the crystal's growth medium, this may be somewhat difficult to accomplish using visible light to illuminate the sample. In this case, the methods of the present invention and, in particular, the UV fluorescence imaging method may also be used, in lieu of and in preference to monitoring X-ray diffraction itself (Pohl et al., Biophysical Journal 86, 397-Pos, 2004)).

A further embodiment of the present invention involves the implementation of the UV fluorescence imaging as a part of an automated system that can collect, store, and analyze a multitude of images from multiple samples without human intervention. Such an automated system can collect multiple images of the same sample each using illumination from different parts of the spectrum, including but limited to UV, visible, and IR, to aid in distinguishing protein crystals from other crystalline or crystal-like matter. Furthermore, these multiple images may be collected at many predetermined time intervals to further distinguish growing protein crystals from static particulate or other image artifacts that do not change smoothly over time. By analyzing each of the different images collected by the automated system for each sample each involving variations in illumination wavelength, focus, time, and the type of detection technology (fluorescence, scattering, absorption), the automated system achieves a higher accuracy for identifying protein crystals over automated systems that collect or analyze images using only one illuminating wavelength, focus, time, and type of detection technology because certain aspects of the protein crystal may be more prominent in one type of image over another.

In yet a further embodiment, the ensemble of different images of the same sample collected by the automated system can be analyzed together as an ensemble to reduce the detrimental effects on accuracy that any one poor image may have on the ability to distinguish between protein crystals and other crystalline or crystal-like matter.

The present invention may be illustrated by the use of the following non-limiting examples:

EXAMPLE IVisualization of Glucose Isomerase Crystals In Hanging Drops With Epi-Fluorescence

Glucose isomerase crystals were grown with 10 mg/ml glucose isomerase in 0.9-2.9 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.7, at 23Â° C. In particular, the crystals were grown in 24 well Linbro plates (Hampton Research, 34 Journey, Aliso Viejo, Calif. 92656-3317) (see FIG. 5) by the hanging drop method. A quartz coverslip was used to suspend the drop over the reservoir solution. The sample was imaged with epifluorescence. The sample was excited through the objective lens used to collect the emission and pass the image to the CCD detector. The fluorescence image is shown as FIG. 7. The bright rod-shaped objects are the protein crystals, and the image shows high contrast. These crystals are 100-200 Î¼M in length. Variation in brightness from crystal to crystal are due to the different depth positions relative to the focal plane of the objective lens, or perhaps also to crystal orientation effects. These crystals were determined to be isotropic in such a way as to shown no birefringence with visible light.

EXAMPLE IIVisualization of Chicken Egg White Lysozyme Crystals In Sitting Drops With Epi-Fluorescence

Lysozyme was grown from pH 4.5 NaOAc buffer and 100 mM, 50 mg/ml solution of protein mixed with equal volumes of 10% NaCl salt solution, same buffer. Reservoir contained 5% salt, same buffer. FIG. 8 shows a visible light image collected with an Olympus stereomicroscope Model SZX12 and an Olympus Model DP12 CCD camera. The sample was subsequently imaged with epifluorescence where the sample's intrinsic fluorescence was excited through the same objective lens used to collect the emission and pass the image to the CCD detector. In this case, a vapor diffusion 96-well high-throughput crystallization plate, covered in tape, contained the sample.

EXAMPLE IIIVisualization of Glucose Isomerase Crystals In Sitting Drops

Glucose isomerase crystals were grown in sitting drops in a 96-well, high-throughput screening tray. Crystals were grown in 1.6 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1M Tris pH 8.0, 18 mg/ml glucose isomerase, 23Â° C. (FIG. 9a), 1.6 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Bicine pH 9.0, 18 mg/ml glucose isomerase, 23Â° C. (FIG. 9b), 15% ethanol, 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2 M magnesium chloride, 23Â° C., 18 mg/ml glucose isomerase (FIG. 9c) and 20% PEG1000, 0.2 M MgCl₂, 0.1 M Na cacodylate pH 6.5, 23Â° C., 18 mg/ml glucose isomerase (FIG. 9d).

FIG. 9 shows visible light images for these four samples, collected with an Olympus stereomicroscope Model SZX12 and an Olympus Model DP12 CCD camera, to be compared respectively with accompanying UV fluorescence images collected using the straight-through geometry setup of FIGS. 3 and 4. In this case, a vapor diffusion 96-well high-throughput crystallization plate covered in tape contained the sample. The well is about 2 mm across, and the protein solution droplet had a volume of 1 Î¼l, and because it does not fill the well, its boundary was visible.

EXAMPLE IVDistinguishing Non-Protein Crystals

FIG. 10 illustrates salt crystals (confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis) grown using 20 mg/ml lysozyme in 50 mM Tris, 100 mM ammonium sulfate, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM magnesium Acetate, 1 mM sodium azide pH 7.4 and mixed in a vapor diffusion crystallization in a 1:1 ratio with 40% Polyethylene glycol 300, 0.2 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M cacodylate pH 6.5 and equilibrated against a reservoir (100 Î¼L) containing 40% Polyethylene glycol 300, 0.2 M calcium acetate, 0.1 M cacodylate pH 6.5. The crystals were grown at 17Â° C. over a few days. In particular, FIG. 10 shows a visible light image collected by illuminating from the side with visible light and using the visible CCD camera of the setup in FIG. 2. A salt crystal (confirmed later by X-ray diffraction) is clearly visible. The sample was subsequently imaged with epifluorescence on the same stand, and the sample's intrinsic fluorescence, if any, should have been excited through the objective lens. This same lens is used to collect any emission and pass the image to the CCD detector. In fact, in the second image of FIG. 10, the fluorescence-mode image, which is designed to be specific for protein, the salt crystals disappeared and were invisible. In this case, a vapor diffusion 96-well high-throughput crystallization plate, covered in tape, contained the sample.

EXAMPLE VDistinguishing Non-Protein Crystals In the Presence of Protein Crystals

As a demonstration of distinguishing protein and salt crystals, known salt crystals (X-shaped pair near center of image) grown as described in Example IV, were transferred by a nylon fiber loop over to a wellplate with glucose isomerase crystals grown from 30% MPD, 0.1 M Na cacodylate pH 6.5 and 0.2 M magnesium acetate. FIG. 11 shows a visible light image collected with an Olympus stereomicroscope Model SZX12 and an Olympus Model DP12 CCD camera, and UV fluorescence was imaged with the straight-through geometry setup of FIGS. 3 and 4. In this case, a vapor diffusion 96-well high-throughput crystallization plate, covered in tape, contained the sample.

EXAMPLE VIDistinguishing Crystals of A Target Protein In Metabolic Disease Research

FIG. 12 illustrates human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B crystals grown according to the method of Puius et al. (Puius, Y. A. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 94, 13420-13425 (1997); as modified by Szczepankiewicz, B. G. et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 4087-4096 (2003)). In summary, crystals were grown at 4Â° C. by vapor diffusion using 3-4 mg/ml of protein with 2-4 mM DTT in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 25 mM NaCl mixed in a 1:1 ratio with 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.0-7.5, 0.2 M magnesium acetate, 12-14% polyethylene glycol 8000 and equilibrated over 1 ml of 0.1M HEPES pH 7.0-7.5, 0.2 M magnesium acetate, 12-14% polyethylene glycol 8000. In particular, FIG. 12 shows a visible light image collected with an Olympus stereomicroscope Model SZX12 and an Olympus Model DP12 CCD camera, and UV fluorescence was imaged with the straight-through geometry setup of FIGS. 3-4. In this case, the crystals were grown in a Linbro plate using the hanging drop method. For imaging the crystals were transferred to a 96 well vapor diffusion plate with tape covering the samples.