CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/408,503, filed Sep. 6, 2002 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/437,736 filed Jan. 2, 2003, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

GOVERNMENT INTEREST

This invention was made with government support under grant CA 78039 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in this invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to analogs of discodermolide and dictyostatin-1, intermediates for the synthesis of such analogs and methods of synthesis of such intermediates and analogs.

References set forth herein may facilitate understanding of the present invention or the background of the present invention. Inclusion of a reference herein, however, is not intended to and does not constitute an admission that the reference is available as prior art with respect to the present invention.

The discovery and development of new chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer is currently of high importance. Some of the best currently available chemotherapeutic agents are natural products or natural product analogs. For example, Taxol (paclitaxel) is a natural product that is currently being used to treat patients with breast and ovarian cancer among others. A number of analogs of Taxol, including Taxotere (docetaxel), are also powerful anticancer agents.

Recently, the natural product (+)-discodermolide and its analogs have shown great promise as anticancer agents. Discodermolide has been shown to have a mechanism of action similar to Taxol but it is active against Taxol-resistant cell lines and it is more water soluble than Taxol. Accordingly, it may have a different and/or broader spectrum of action than Taxol and be easier to formulate and administer. Like Taxol, discodermolide is difficult to synthesize. Some syntheses of discodermolide are described in the following papers: Nerenberg, J. B.; Hung, D. T.; Somers, P. K.; Schreiber, S. L. Total synthesis of the immunosuppressive agent (âˆ’)-discodermolide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12621-12622; Smith, A. B., III; Qiu, Y.; Jones, D. R.; Kobayashi, K. Total Synthesis of (âˆ’)-Discodermolide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12011-12012; Marshall, J. A.; Johns, B. A. Total synthesis of (+)-discodermolide. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7885-7892; Paterson, I.; Florence, G. J.; Gerlach, K.; Scott, J. P. Total synthesis of the antimicrotubule agent (+)-discodermolide using boron-mediated aldol reactions of chiral ketones. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Eng. 2000, 39, 377-380; Paterson, I.; Florence, G. J. Synthesis of (+)-discodermolide and analogues by control of asymmetric induction in aldol reactions of gamma-chiral (Z)-enals. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6935-6939; Smith, A. B.; Beauchamp, T. J.; LaMarche, M. J.; Kaufman, M. D.; Qiu, Y. P. et al. Evolution of a gram-scale synthesis of (+)-discodermolide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8654-8664. [Image Omitted]

Analogs of discodermolide have also been made and tested for activity. For example, see the above references and Paterson, I.; Florence, G. J.; Gerlach, K.; Scott, J. P.; Sereinig, N. A practical synthesis of (+)-discodermolide and analogues: Fragment union by complex aldol reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9535-9544; Martello, L. A.; LaMarche, M. J.; He, L.; Beauchamp, T. J.; Smith, A. B. et al. The relationship between taxol and (+)-discodermolide: synthetic analogs and modeling studies. Chemistry Biol. 2001, 8, 843-855; Harried, S. S.; Yang, G.; Strawn, M. A.; Myles, D. C. Total Synthesis of (âˆ’)-Discodermolide: An Application of a Chelation-Controlled Alkylation Reaction. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6098-6099; Paterson, I.; Florence, G. J. Synthesis of (+)-discodermolide and analogues by control of asymmetric induction in aldol reactions of gamma-chiral (Z)-enals. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6935-6939.

Unlike Taxol, discodermolide is not readily available in large quantities from natural sources. Accordingly, assuring a sufficient supply of discodermolide is problematic. Simplified analogs that retain high anti-cancer activity but are easier to make are in urgent need.

Very recently, an unusual macrolactone natural product dictyostatin 1 has been isolated from two different sponges and a partial structure has been assigned as shown below. See Pettit, G. R.; Cichacz, Z. A. Isolation and structure of dictyostatin 1. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,430,053; 1995; Pettit, G. R.; Cichacz, Z. A.; Gao, F.; Boyd, M. R.; Schmidt, J. M. Isolation and structure of the cancer cell growth inhibitor dictyostatin 1. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1111-1112. The configurations at C16 and C19 have not yet been assigned in the natural product and the absolute configuration is not known. Dictyostatin shows extremely high potencies against and array of cancer cell lines. [Image Omitted]

Recently, dictyostatin has also been shown to stabilize microtubules, like discodermolide and Taxol. See Wright, A. E.; Cummins, J. L.; Pomponi, S. A.; Longley, R. E.; Isbrucker, R. A. Dictyostatin compounds for stabilization of microtubules. In PCT Int. Appl.; WO62239, 2001. Accordingly, dictyostatin 1 and its analogs show great promise as new anticancer agents. There is an urgent need for a synthetic route to make dictyostatin 1 and its analogs in order to fully assign the structure of dictyostatin 1, to produce analogs to study the structure/activity relationship and to identify and produce the best possible drugs in this family.

The inventors of the present invention, as one aspect of the present invention, herein set forth a number of analogs of discodermolide, as well as methods and intermediates for the synthesis thereof. The inventors of the present invention, as another aspect of the present invention, herein set forth a family of both closed and open analogs of dictyostatin 1 with methods and intermediates for the synthesis of this family.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the present invention provides a compound of the following structure: [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R²is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”CH₂CH(CH₃), â€”CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃)â€”, or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R⁴is (CH₂)_pwhere p is an integer in the range of 4 to 12, (CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^y4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4), â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, wherein y1 and y2 are 1 and y3, y4 and y5 are independently 0 or 1, R^k1, R^k2, R^k3, R^k4and R^k5are independently H, CH₃, or OR^2a, and R^s1, R^s2, R^s3, and R^s4are independently H or CH₃, wherein R^2ais H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; and
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; provided that the compound is not dictyostatin 1.

When groups including, but not limited to, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, and/or COR^eare set forth as a substituent for more than one group in compounds of the claims and the specification of the present invention (for example, as a substituent of R², R^2a, R^s1, R^s2, R^s3, R^s4and R⁵above), it is to be understood that the groups of those substituents (R^a, R^b, R^c, R^d, and R^ein this example), are independently, the same of different within each group and amoung the groups.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer: [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is alkenyl; R²is H; R³is â€”CH₂CH(CH₃) or â€”CHâ• C(CH₃); and R⁴is â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)C(R^s4)â€” wherein y1-y4 are 1, y5 is 0, R^k1and R^k3are OH, R^k2is H, R^k4is CH₃, R^s1, R^s2, R^s3and R^s4are H, and R⁵is OH.

In one embodiment, R¹is â€”CHâ• CH₂and R⁴is [Image Omitted]

In another aspect, the present invention provides a compound of the following structure: [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R²and R^2dare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^E;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”CH₂CH(CH₃)â€”, CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃)â€”, or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R⁴is (CH₂)_pwhere p is an integer in the range of 4 to 12, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4), â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4), â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_{y 2}(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R_s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, wherein y1 and y2 are 1 and y3, y4 and y5 are independently 0 or 1, R^k1, R^k2, R^k3, R^k4and R^k5are independently H, â€”CH₃, or OR^2a, and R^s1, R^s2, R^s3, and R^s4are independently H or CH₃, wherein R^2ais H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; and
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; and
R¹⁰is H or alkyl.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is alkenyl; R²is H; R^2dis H, OC(O)CH₃or OC(O)NR^gR^hwherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group; R³is CH₂CH(CH₃) or CHâ• C(CH₃); and R⁴is â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4)â€” wherein y1-y4 are 1, y5 is 0, R^k1and R^K3are OH, R^k2is H, R^k4is CH₃, R^s1, R^s2, R^s3and R^s4are H, R⁵is OH; and R¹⁰is H or alkyl.

In another embodiment, R¹is â€”CHâ• CH₂, and R^2dis H, OC(O)CH₃or OC(O)NH₂.]

In a further aspect, the present invention provides a compound of the following structure: [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R²and R^2dare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”H₂CH(CH₃)â€”, â€”CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃), or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^11aand R^11bare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^11aand R^11btogether form a portion of six-membered acetal ring incorporating CR^tR^u;
R^tand R^uare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyarly group; and
R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2cC, CHâ• CHCHO, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is alkenyl; R^2dis H, OC(O)CH₃or OC(O)NR^gR^hwherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group; R³is CH₂CH(CH₃) or CHâ• C(CH₃); R^11aand R^11bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂; R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl.

In another embodiment, R¹is â€”CHâ• CH₂, R^2dis H, â€”OC(O)CH₃or â€”OC(O)NH₂, and R¹²is â€”CH₂OH, â€”CHO or â€”CO₂R¹⁰.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a compound having the following structure: [Image Omitted]
wherein R²is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”H₂CH(CH₃)â€”, â€”CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃), or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^11aand R^11bare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^11aand R^11btogether form a portion of six-membered acetal ring containing CR^tR^u;
R^tand R^uare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxy aryl group;
R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2cor CHâ• CHCHO, CHâ• CHCO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl; and
R^14aand R^14bare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^14aand R^14btogether form a six-membered ring containing CR^vR^w, wherein R^vand R^ware independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyaryl group.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
R²is H; R^2dis H, OC(O)CH₃or OC(O)NR^gR^hwherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group; R³is CH₂CH(CH₃) or CHâ• C(CH₃); R^11aand R^11bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂; R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR²C, CHâ• CHCHO or CHâ• CHCO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl; and R^14aand R^14bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a compound having the following formula [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R²is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”H₂CH(CH₃), â€”Hâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃)â€”, or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R^11aand R^11bare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^11aand R^11btogether form a portion of six-membered acetal ring containing CR^tR^u;
R^tand R^uare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyarly group;
R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO or CHâ• CHCO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl; and
R^14aand R^14bare independently H, an alkyl group, and aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^14aand R^14btogether form a six-membered ring containing CR^vR^w, wherein R^vand R^ware independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyaryl group.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R³is CH₂CH(CH₃) or CHâ• C(CH₃); R^11aand R^11bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂; R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO or CHâ• CHCO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl; and R^14aand R^14bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂.

In a further aspect, the present invention provides a compound having the following formula [Image Omitted]
wherein R²is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^11aand R^11bare independently H, an alkyl group, and aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^11aand R^11btogether form a portion of six-membered acetal ring containing CR^tR^u;
R^tand R^uare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyarly group;
R¹²is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO or CHâ• CHCO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^E, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl;
R¹⁶is H or alkyl; and
R¹⁷is CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2fis H, an alkyl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R²is H, an alkyl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, R^11aand R^11bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂; and R¹⁶is H or alkyl.

In still a further aspect, the present invention provides a compound having the following formula [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R², R^2dand R^2eare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”H₂CH(CH₃), â€”CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃), or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
q is an integer in the range of 2 to 5;
R¹⁸is H, and R¹⁹is hydroxy, alkoxy or â€”SR^z, wherein R^zis an alkyl group or an aryl group, or R¹⁸and R¹⁹taken together are â• O.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]

In one embodiment of the compound, R¹is a CHâ• CH₂and R³is (Z)-CHâ• CHâ€”, or â€”CH₂CH₂â€”.

In a further aspect, the present invention provides a compound having the following structure [Image Omitted]
R^11aand R^11bare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^11aand R^11btogether form a portion of six-membered acetal ring containing CR^tR^u;
R^tand R^uare independently H, an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyarly group;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R²⁰is CH₂OR^2g, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰; wherein R^2gis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and wherein R¹⁰is H or alkyl; and
R²¹is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R^11a, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO or CHâ• CHCO₂R¹⁰, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and wherein R^10ais H or alkyl.

In one embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R^11aand R^11bare independently H, an alkyl group, and aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, COR^e, or R^11aand R^btogether form a portion of six-membered acetal ring incorporating CR^tR^u;
R^tand R^uare independently H, an alkyl, an aryl group or an alkoxyarly group;
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R²⁰is CH₂OR^2g, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰; wherein R^2gis H, an alkyl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and wherein R¹⁰is H or alkyl; and
R²¹is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R^10a, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO, CHâ• CHCO²R¹⁰wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and wherein R^10ais H or alkyl.

In one embodiment, R^11aand R^11bare H or together form a portion of a six-membered acetal ring containing C(H)(p-C₆H₄OCH₃) or C(CH₃)₂; R²¹is a halogen atom, CH₂OR^2c, CHO, CO₂R¹⁰, CHâ• CHCH₂OR^2c, CHâ• CHCHO, wherein R^2cis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e, and R¹⁰is H or alkyl.

In another embodiment, R¹is CHâ• CH₂, and R²¹is CH₂OH, CHO or CO₂R¹⁰.

In still another aspect, the present invention provides a compound having the following formula [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹³is H or an alkyl group, R¹⁴is H, an aryl group, an alkoxyaryl group or an alkyl group, and R²²is a halogen atom or â€”P(Ar)₃X, wherein X is a counteranion selected from the groups halide, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate and sulfonate, provided that when R¹³and R¹⁴are methyl groups, X is not I. In one embodiment, when R¹³and R¹⁴are alkyl groups, X is not halogen.

In another embodiment, the compound has the following stereostructure, or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹³is H or an alkyl group, and R¹⁴is H, an aryl group, an alkoxyaryl group, or an alkyl group, an aryl group or an alkoxyarly group, R²²is a halogen atom or â€”P(Ar)₃X, wherein X is a counteranion selected from the groups halide, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate and sulfonate, provided that when R¹³and R¹⁴are methyl groups, X is not 1.

In one embodiment, R¹³is H, R¹⁴is aryl, and R²²is P(C₆H₅)₃X. In another embodiment, R¹⁴is C₆H₄-p-OCH₃.

In still a further aspect, the present invention provides a process for conversion of a first compound with the formula [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R²is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^2dis H
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”CH₂CH(CH₃)â€”, CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃)â€”, or â€”Câ‰¡Câ€”;
R⁴is (CH₂)_pwhere p is an integer in the range of 4 to 12, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^y4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4), â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^y2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, wherein y1 and y2 are 1 and y3, y4 and y5 are independently 0 or 1, R^k1, R^k2, R^k3k, R^k4and R^k5are independently H, CH₃, or OR^2a, and R^s1, R^s2, R^s3, and R^s4are independently H or CH₃, wherein R^2ais H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; and
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; and
R¹⁰is H;
to a second compound with the formula [Image Omitted]
comprising the step of reacting the first compound under conditions suitable to effect macrolactonization.

In one embodiment, the process is for conversion of a compound with the following stereostructure or its enantiomer [Image Omitted]
wherein R¹is H, an alkyl group, an alkenyl group, an alkynyl group, or a halogen atom;
R²is H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R^2dis H
R^a, R^band R^care independently an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R^dis an alkyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxylalkyl group, â€”RⁱSiR^aR^bR^cor a benzyl group, wherein Rⁱis an alkylene group;
R^eis an alkyl group, an allyl group, a benzyl group, an aryl group, an alkoxy group, or â€”NR^gR^h, wherein R^gand R^hare independently H, an alkyl group or an aryl group;
R³is (CH₂)_nwhere n is and integer in the range of 0 to 5, â€”H₂CH(CH₃), CHâ• CHâ€”, â€”CHâ• C(CH₃)â€”, or â€”Câ€”;
R⁴is (CH₂)_pwhere p is an integer in the range of 4 to 12, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)C(R^s2)â• C(R^s4)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s5)â€”, â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5CH(R^s1)CH(R^s2)CH(R^s3)CH(R^s4)â€”, wherein y1 and y2 are 1 and y3, y4 and y5 are independently 0 or 1, R^k1, R^k2, R^k3, R^k4and R^k5are independently H, â€”CH₃, or OR^2a, and R^s1, R^s2, R^s3, and R^s4are independently H or CH₃, wherein R^2ais H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e;
R⁵is H or OR^2b, wherein R^2bis H, an alkyl group, an aryl group, a benzyl group, a trityl group, â€”SiR^aR^bR^c, CH₂OR^d, or COR^e; and
R¹⁰is H
to a second compound with the formula [Image Omitted]

In one embodiment of the process, R¹is alkenyl; R³is CH₂CH(CH₃) or CHâ• C(CH₃); and R⁴is â€”(CHR^k1)_y1(CHR^k2)_y2(CHR^k3)_y3(CHR^k4)_y4(CHR^k5)_y5C(R^s1)â• C(R^s2)C(R^s3)â• C(R^s4)â€” wherein y1-y4 are 1, y5 is 0, R^k1and R^k3are R^2a, R^k2is H, R^k4is CH₃, R^s1-R^s4are H, and R⁵is OR^2b.

In another embodiment of the process, R¹is CHâ• CH₂and R⁴is [Image Omitted]

In one embodiment of the process, the first compound is converted by reacting the first compound with 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoylchloride.

The above general structures for the compounds of the present invention include all stereoisomers thereof (other than the natural compound dictyostatin 1). Moreover, the structures of the compounds of the present invention include the compounds in racemic form, enantiomerically enriched form or enantiomerically pure form.

The terms â€œalkylâ€ , â€œarylâ€ and other groups refer generally to both unsubstituted and substituted groups unless specified to the contrary. In that regard, the groups set forth above can be substituted with a wide variety of substituents to synthesize analogs retaining biological activity. Unless otherwise specified, alkyl groups are hydrocarbon groups and are preferably C₁-C₁₅(that is, having 1 to 15 carbon atoms) alkyl groups, and more preferably C₁-C₁₀alkyl groups, and can be branched or unbranched, acyclic or cyclic. The above definition of an alkyl group and other definitions apply also when the group is a substituent on another group (for example, an alkyl group as a substituent of an alkylamino group or a dialkylamino group). The term â€œarylâ€ refers to phenyl or naphthyl. As used herein, the terms â€œhalogenâ€ or â€œhaloâ€ refer to fluoro, chloro, bromo and iodo.

The term â€œalkoxyâ€ refers to â€”OR, wherein R is an alkyl group. The term â€œalkenylâ€ refers to a straight or branched chain hydrocarbon group with at least one double, bond, preferably with 2-15 carbon atoms, and more preferably with 2-10 carbon atoms (for example, â€”CHâ• CHR or â€”CH₂CHâ• CHR; wherein R can be a group including, but not limited to, an alkyl group, an alkoxyalkyl group, an amino alkyl group, an aryl group, or a benzyl group). The term â€œalkynylâ€ refers to a straight or branched chain hydrocarbon group with at least one triple bond, preferably with 2-15 carbon atoms, and more preferably with 2-10 carbon atoms (for example, â€”Câ‰¡CR or â€”CH₂â€”Câ‰¡CR; wherein R can be a group including, but not limited to, an alkyl group, an alkoxyalkyl group, an amino alkyl group, an aryl group, or a benzyl group). The terms â€œalkylene,â€ â€œalkenyleneâ€ and â€œalkynyleneâ€ refer to bivalent forms of alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl groups, respectively.

The term â€œtritylâ€ refers to a triphenyl methyl group or â€”C(Ph)₃.

Certain groups such as amino and hydroxy groups may include protective groups as known in the art. Preferred protective groups for amino groups include tert-butyloxycarbonyl, formyl, acetyl, benzyl, p-methoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, trityl. Other suitable protecting groups as known to those skilled in the art are disclosed in Greene, T., Wuts, P. G. M., Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, Wiley (1991), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Other aspects of the present invention include the synthesis of the compounds of the preent invention as well as the biological assaying of such compound and the biological activity of such compounds against, for example, cancer (such as breast, prostate cancer and ovarial cancer). For example, in another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating a patient for cancer, including the step of administering a pharmaceutically effective amount of a biologically active compound of the present invention or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

The present invention, along with the attributes and attendant advantages thereof, will best be appreciated and understood in view of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of the syntheses of a representative isomeric aldehyde for incorporation of the left part of the configuration of (+)-discodermolide.

FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the syntheses of another representative isomeric aldehyde for incorporation of the left part of the configuration of (+)-discodermolide.

FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the syntheses of an intermediate for the center part of the configuration of (+)-discodermolide.

FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of the construction of the right fragment or part of the molecule.

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of the synthesis of several discodermolide analogs of the present invention.

FIGS. 6A through D illustrate the tubulin polymerization-inducing properties of discodermolide (Figure A), as well as discodermolide analog compounds 40 (Figure B), 41 (Figure C) and 42 (Figure D) of the present invention in comparison to 10 Î¼M paclitaxel (PTX).

FIG. 7 illustrates a retrosynthetic analysis of a dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of the coupling of three fragments of a dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 9 illustrates the structures of several acyclic compounds of the present invention that were tested for biological activity.

FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment of the synthesis of a lower fragment of a dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of the synthesis of a macrolactone of the present invention.

FIG. 12 illustrates a second representative general scheme for synthesis of stereoisomers and analogs of dictyostatin.

FIG. 13 illustrates a summary of an embodiment of the synthesis of the bottom fragment of dictyostatin analogs of the present invention.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment of the coupling of the bottom fragment of FIG. 13 with the center fragment of the dictyostatin analogs of the present invention.

FIG. 15 illustrates an embodiment of the introduction of the C16 stereocenter and introduction of the top fragment of the dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment of the completion of the synthesis of the dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 17 illustrates embodiments of representative methods to make analogs of the terminal diene fragment of the dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 18 illustrates a summary of an embodiment of the synthesis of the bottom fragment of the dictyostatin analog of the present invention.

FIG. 19 illustrates an embodiment of the synthesis of two fragments with anti/anti configurations as assigned to dictyostatin 1 at C13-C15.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Synthesis of Simplified Analogs of Discodermolide: The inventors of the present invention hypothesized that active analogs of discodermolide would result after removal of the C14 and C16 methyl groups and the C7 hydroxy group. These deletions greatly simplify the synthesis by allowing the two cis-disubstituted alkenes of analogs 1 and 2 to be made by Wittig-type reactions. A family of simple analogs 1 were shown to have moderate activity. However, by incorporating a lactone in place of the simple ester side chains of 1, the inventors of the present invention have discovered anti-cancer agents of increased activity that are still significantly simpler to make than discodermolide. [Image Omitted]

The syntheses of two representative isomeric aldehydes 9a and 9b for, incorporation of the left part of these molecules are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. he synthesis of the left display bearing the configuration of (+)-discodermolide started with the commercially available methacrolein 3 (FIG. 1). Reaction of 3 with the boron enolate of Evans oxazolidinone 4 gave the corresponding alcohol, which was silylated to give compound 5 in 90% yield. Lactonization followed by the introduction of allyl group was performed by the previously reported method to give 6 in good yield. See Day, B. W.; Kangani, C. O.; Avor, K. S. Convenient syntheses of (2R,3S,4R)-3-(tert-butyidimethylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethyl-5-oxopentanoic acid methoxymethyl-amide from methacrolein. Preparation of C1-C7 and C17-C24 fragments of (+)-discodermolide. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2002, 13, 1161-1165. Lactone opening, oxidation and allylation gave 7. Conversion to the methyl acetal was accomplished by DIBAL (diisobutylaluminum hydride) reduction to the corresponding lactol followed by treatment with camphorsulfonic acid (CSA) in methanol to give a desilylated intermediate, which was protected with methoxymethyl chloride (MOMCl) to give a mixture of anomers 8 (Î²:Î±=1:1). These were separable by silica gel flash chromatography. The final left fragment 9a was obtained by hydroboration of the Î±-anomer 8 with BH₃-DMS (borane-dimethysulfide) followed by oxidation with SO₃-pyridine.

The synthesis of the C4-epi lactone left display 9b started from 1,4-butanediol (FIG. 2). Monoprotection with PMB bromide (PMB is p-methoxybenzyl) was performed with NaH in DMF. After oxidation, reaction of the crude aldehyde 10 with the boron enolate of Evans oxazolidinone 4 gave the corresponding syn-alcohol, which was silylated to give compound 11 in 90% yield. Lithium borohydride reduction followed by oxidation gave the aldehyde 12. A second syn-aldol addition was performed with same Evans oxazolidinone 4 to give the corresponding alcohol, which was protected with MOM chloride to give compound 13. Desilylation of 13 with HF gave the cyclized product 14 in high yield. Conversion to the methyl acetal was easily accomplished by DIBAL reduction to the corresponding lactol followed by treatment with PPTS (pyridinium p-toluene sulfonate) in methanol to give 15 as a 2.5:1 (x[3) mixture of anomers from which the major anomer (a) was isolated by silica gel flash chromatography. The final left fragment 9b was obtained by hydrogenolysis of the PMB protecting group followed by Dess-Martin oxidation.

These synthetic routes are flexible and substantially any stereoisomer of the lactone 9 can be made with the appropriate chiral auxiliary and reaction conditions.

Center intermediate 21 was prepared as shown in FIG. 3. Oxazolidinone 18 was prepared from (S)-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionic methyl ester 16 by the known procedure for the preparation of ent-18. See Clark, D. L.; Heathcock, C. H. Studies on the alkylation of chiral enolates: application toward the total synthesis of discodermolide. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58 5878-5879. Reduction of 18 with lithium borohydride gave the diol, which was protected by anisaldehyde dimethyl acetal 19 to give the acetal 20. Deprotection of the primary TBS group with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF), iodination, and treatment with triphenylphosphine afforded the phosphonium salt 21 in 72% yield. Phosphonium salts 22 and 23 were also used for Wittig olefination, but the results were unsatisfactory. Smith also encountered difficulties with related Wittig reagents in discodermolide synthesis. See: Smith, A. B.; Beauchamp, T. J.; LaMarche, M. J.; Kaufman, M. D.; Qiu, Y. P. et al. Evolution of a gram-scale synthesis of (+)-discodermolide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8654-8664. These difficulties may result, at least in part, from the hygroscopic nature of the phosphonium salts. In contrast, compound 21 is a white, non-hygroscopic solid and its Wittig reactions were reliable even though no special care was taken with its storage (for example, salt 21 was useful for reactions even after it was stored at room temperature for several months).

As shown in FIG. 4, the construction of the right fragment 34 featured aldol reactions. Syn-Aldol reaction of aldehyde 24 with 4 provided 25, which was reduced to a diol and protected with anisaldehyde dimethyl acetal 19 to give 26. Selective opening of the benzylidine ring of 26 with DIBAL gave a primary alcohol, which was oxidized to aldehyde 27. The subsequent anti-aldol condensation using Heathcock's aldol reaction with dimethylphenyl propionate 28 furnished compound 29 as the major product in 73% yield. See Heathcock, C. H.; Pirrung, M. C.; Montgomery, S. H.; Lampe, J. Acyclic stereoselection-13; Aryl esters: reagents for threo-aldolization. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 4087-4095. The relative configuration of intermediate 29 was confirmed by ¹³C and ¹H NMR analyses of the corresponding acetonide 34. Silylation of the newly formed hydroxyl group of 29, reduction of the aryl ester with DIBAL and Dess-Martin oxidation of the resultant primary alcohol afforded aldehyde 30. The Z-diene moiety was introduced by a two-step procedure developed by Paterson and coworkers using a Nozaki-Hiyama reaction. See Paterson, I.; Schlapbach, A. Studies towards the total synthesis of the marine-derived immunosuppresant discodermolide: stereoselective synthesis of a C₉-C₂₄subunit. Synlett. 1995, 498-500. Addition of the aldehyde 30 and allyl bromide 31 to a suspension of CrCl₂in THF produced an intermediate Î²-hydroxy silane (not shown), which upon treatment with NaH underwent syn elimination to generate the required Z-diene 32. Selective deprotection of the primary TBS group, iodination, and then treatment with triphenylphosphine gave the phosphonium salt 33 in good yield.

The first Wittig reaction of 9a with 21 provided 35 (see FIG. 5). DIBAL reductive cleavage of the acetal followed by Dess-Martin oxidation gave aldehyde 37. Likewise, aldehyde 38 was made from 9b via 36. The second Wittig olefination was accomplished with 38 as an example and phosphonium salt 33 (FIG. 5). Tetrabutylammonium fluoride deprotection followed by carbamoylation using Kocovsky's method (See Kocovsky, P. Carbamates: a method of synthesis and some synthetic applications. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27 5521-5524) afforded the C19 carbamate-containing compound 39. The lactone was built from the methyl acetal in the left fragment by using aqueous 60% acetic acid in THF followed by Dess-Martin oxidation. Deprotected analog 40 containing a free C3 hydroxy group on the lactone was obtained by the removal of MOM group with 4N HCl followed by removal of the PMB protecting groups with DDQ oxidation. Two additional example compounds, 41 and 42, were prepared from the intermediate 39 by using appropriate conditions. All three of these analogs exhibited significant activity, as shown in FIGS. 6A-D and Table 1. Surprisingly, the C3-MOM-protected analogs 41 and 42 showed better microtubule hypernucleation activities than the analog 40 with a free C3-hydroxy group. As can be seen in FIG. 6A, discodermolide is superior to paclitaxel (taxol) in that it causes equivalent microtubule assembly at both lower concentrations and temperatures (the increase in absorbance caused by discodermolide occurs at a time point earlier than that caused by paclitaxel). Additionally, the polymer induced to form by discodermolide is more resistant to cold-induced disassembly than is the paclitaxel-induced polymer. Both analogs 41 (FIG. 6C) and 42 (FIG. 6D) showed these more rapid polymer-inducing and cold-resistant properties, albeit at somewhat lower potencies (for example, higher concentrations of the analogs were necessary for these effects to be detected) than discodermolide. MOM ether lactone 41 was the most potent among these analogs.

Table 1 shows microtubule stabilizing, antiproliferative, and paclitaxel-displacing properties of 40-42. Again, the lactone, MOM ether 41 was more potent than the lactol 42 or free hydroxy 40 relatives. The cellular activity of 41 was good, showing a submicromolar 50% growth inhibitory (GI₅₀) concentration. This compound also showed considerable affinity for the paclitaxel binding site on tubulin. A 2-fold molar excess of 41 displaced [³H]paclitaxel from microtubules better than paclitaxel and at almost the same potency as discodermolide.

TABLE 1Microtubule stabilizing, antiproliferative and paclitaxel-displacing properties ofcompounds 40-42 in comparison to (+)-discodermolide (1) and paclitaxel.MTstabilizingDisplacement ofactivityMDA-MB231GI₅₀(Î¼M)^b2008[³H]paclitaxelCompound(%)^a(breast)PC3 (prostate)(ovarian)(%)^cdiscodermolide>1000.016 Â± 0.0030.067 Â± 0.0040.072 Â± 0.00564 Â± 2paclitaxel1000.0024 Â± 0.00160.015 Â± 0.0020.0092 Â± 0.001637 Â± 140112.1 Â± 1.87.5 Â± 2.05.2 Â± 1.021 Â± 141270.87 Â± 0.211.8 Â± 0.90.65 Â± 0.2557 Â± 242113.4 Â± 0.815 Â± 3â€‚4.7 Â± 0.619 Â± 2
^aPercent tubulin assembly induced by test agent at 10 Î¼M vs. that caused by 10 Î¼M paclitaxel (100%); single determinations at 30Â° C.

^bConcentrations at which test agent caused 50% inhibition of cell growth; means (N = 4 over 10 concentrations) Â± SD after 72 h of continuous exposure to the agent.

^cPercent displacement by 4 Î¼M test agent of 2 Î¼M [³H]paclitaxel bound to microtubules formed from 2 Î¼M tubulin and 20 Î¼M dideoxyGTP.

Macrocycle 43 is a representative example of a dictyostatin analog with an alkyl chain bridging the lactone carbonyl group and the C10/C11 alkene and with two Z-double bonds in the macrocycle. It can also be considered as a macrocyclic analog of discodermolide. This can be synthesized convergently from three components-33, 21 and 44-via sequential Wittig couplings and a macrocyclization (FIG. 7). This design allows the synthesis of substantially any stereoisomer by employing the desired isomer of the relevant precursorâ€”21 or 33.

Fragment 45 was synthesized from 1,10-decanediol (not shown) by mono-TBS protection (NaH/TBSCl, 42%) followed by Dess-Martin oxidation (80%). Fragment 21 was prepared as shown in FIG. 3. Fragment 33 was prepared as shown in FIG. 4.

The coupling of the three fragments is summarized in FIG. 8. Generation of the ylide from phosphonium salt 21 and NaHDMS followed by addition of aldehyde 44 gave the Wittig product in good yield (75%) provided that the reaction was conducted at high concentration (1M in 21). The formation of the Z-alkene was confirmed by the 10 Hz coupling constant between the vinyl protons. Selective opening of the PMB acetal was accomplished by addition of 3 equiv of DIBAL to give a primary alcohol. This was oxidized to an aldehyde under Dess-Martin conditions. Wittig conditions similar to those above were then deployed to prepare 45 from this aldehyde and phosphonium salt 33.

Selective deprotection of 45 was achieved using HF-pyridine and the resulting primary alcohol was oxidized to acid 46. The other TBS group was then removed with TBAF. Using the Yamaguchi protocol, the macrolactone ring was then constructed. PMB deprotection using DDQ provided target product 43, whose protons and carbons were assigned by COSY and HMQC NMR experiments. The location of the macrolactone ring was confirmed by HMBC NMR experiments.

Acyclic compounds 47, 48 and 49 were readily made from appropriate synthetic intermediates (45 or 46) in reasonable yields (FIG. 9).

These analogs were tested for antiproliferative activity in vitro against two human cancer cell lines (Table 2). Macrolactone 43 and non-cyclized alcohol 47 and ester 48 exhibited similar 50% growth inhibitory concentrations, in the 15-30 Î¼M range. Carboxylic acid 49 was inactive (>50 Î¼M) possibly due to poor cell membrane penetration. The modest activity of these compounds is encouraging given the simplicity and flexibility of their lower chain.

We therefore decided to introduce the more complex bottom part of dictyostatin-1 lacking only the C9â€²-OH group. The synthesis of a lower fragment more closely related to dictyostatin is shown in FIG. 10. Synthesis of the needed aldehyde 51 (FIG. 10) started from the intermediate 25, which was reduced to an alcohol with LiBH₄, followed by PMB acetal protection as in FIG. 4. Selective acetal opening produced alcohol 50, which was subjected to Dess-Martin oxidation to give aldehyde 27 (see FIG. 4). Wittig-Homer reaction, and removal of the TBS group with HF-pyridine gave a primary alcohol, which was oxidized to aldehyde 51.

Center part Wittig salt 21 (FIG. 3) was reacted with aldehyde 51 to give the (Z)-olefin (FIG. 11). This was followed by selective PMP acetal opening with NaCNBH₃-TMSCl to yield a primary alcohol. The aldehyde obtained after Dess-Martin oxidation was again subjected to Wittig reaction with 33 to generate 52. Ester 52 was reduced to the alcohol with DIBAL, followed by Dess-Martin oxidation and application of the Still (Z)-variant of the Wittig reaction to afford (E,Z) doubly unsaturated ester 53. Selective removal of the TBS groups was accomplished by exposure to 3N HCl-MeOH in THF (1:1). The resulting ester was hydrolyzed by using 1N KOH in refluxing in EtOH. Finally, the Yamaguchi lactonization protocol followed by DDQ deprotection gave macrolactone 54, whose structure was confirmed by HMBC and other NMR experiments. No isomerization of either of the dienes or the isolated cis-alkenes was detected.

Compound 54 proved to be quite potent in terms of antiproliferative activity against human carcinoma cells (Table 2) showing a 50% growth inhibitory concentration against breast and ovarian cancer cells of about 1 Î¼M. Furthermore compound 54 displaced [³H]paclitaxel stoichiometrically bound to microtubules at about â…“^rdthe potency of discodermolide.

TABLE 2Human Cancer Cell Growth Inhibitory and Paclitaxel DisplacingProperties of Macrolactone Discodermolide AnalogsGI₅₀(Î¼M)^aMDA-MB-2312008Displacement of(breast)(ovary)[³H]paclitaxel (%)^c43â€ƒâ€‰27 Â± 1â€ƒâ€‰16 Â± 118 Â± 547â€ƒâ€‰18 Â± 1â€ƒâ€‰22 Â± 521 Â± 248â€ƒâ€‰26 Â± 3â€ƒâ€‰19 Â± 217 Â± 149>50>5016 Â± 354â€ƒ1.4 Â± 0.1^bâ€ƒ1.0 Â± 0.1^b27 Â± 8discodermolide0.016 Â± 0.003^b0.072 Â± 0.005^b64 Â± 2
^aFifty percent growth inhibitory concentration after 48 or 72^bhours of continuous exposure (mean Â± standard deviation; N = 4).

^cPercent displacement by 4 Î¼M test agent of 2 Î¼M [³H]paclitaxel bound to microtubules formed from 2 Î¼M tubulin and 20 Î¼M dideoxyGTP (N = 6, means Â± SD).

A second representative general strategy for the synthesis of stereoisomers and close analogs of dictyostatin is shown in FIG. 12. Again the molecule is dissected such that every stereocenter can be controlled and modified either by starting with an appropriate precursor or through an asymmetric reaction allowing access to both possible isomers.

FIG. 13 summarizes the synthesis of the bottom fragment. (S)-Diethyl maleate was reduced and the resulting diol was converted to acetonide 55. Reduction to the aldehyde and standard Evans aldol reaction gave 56. Reduction of this to the aldehyde and Wittig-Homer Emmons reaction gave 57. Removal of the acetonide and silyation gave 58, which was mono-desilylated to 59 and oxidized to aldehyde 60.

Coupling of the bottom fragment with the center fragment and elaboration are shown in FIG. 14. Wittig reaction of 21 (FIG. 3) and 60 proceeded smoothly to form 61, which was hydrolyzed and reduced to give 62. After tritylation to 63, DIBAL reduction gave 64. Oxidation and Wittig-Homer reaction produced 65, which was reduced to give 66 and hydrolyzed to acid 67. Activation of 67 as the mixed anhydride preceded conversion to the oxazolidinone 68.

Introduction of the C16 stereocenter and introduction of the top fragment are shown in FIG. 15. Evans asymmetric alkylation to 69 followed by removal of the chiral auxiliary by reduction gave 70. Separately, reagent 71 was made from the Evans oxazolindinone by displacement with LiCH₂P(O)(OMe)₂. Dess-Martin oxidation and Horner-Emmons olefination with 71 then gave 72, which was reduced with NiCl₂/NaBH₄to 73. Now reduction with sodium borohydride gave a 2.8/1 mixture of stereoisomers, which could be separated and converted to the final products independently. Silylation to 75 followed by DIBAL reduction gave 76, which was converted to diene 77 as described above. Detriylation then gave 78.

Completion of the synthesis is shown in FIG. 16. Dess-Martin oxidation and Still-Gennari olefination gave 79 which was deprotected with DDQ to 80. Saponification then gave the hydroxy acid 81 ready for macrocyclization. Treatment of 81 under the Yamaguchi protocol gave 82, which was finally deprotected to give the target product 83, an isomer of dictyostatin 1 called dictyostatin 5.

Representative methods to make analogs of the terminal diene fragment are shown in FIG. 17. Alkene 84 was ozonized to give the aldehyde, which was subjected to a Wittig reaction to give analogs like 85. Alternatively, 84 can be converted to the Z-vinyl iodide 86, which can in turn be coupled with organometallic reagents like phenyl zinc iodide to give 87. This combination of olefination and organometallic and related coupling methods allows access to a wide variety of groups in this position.

The versatility of the synthesis is illustrated by the preparations of representative additional fragments that can be used to make dictyostatin, its isomers and its analogs. FIG. 18 summarizes the synthesis of a fully elaborated bottom fragment 92. Acetal 88, readily prepared from (D)-malic acid, was silylated with t-butyidiphenylsilyl chloride (TBDPSCl). Reductive cleavage of the acetal with DIBAL followed by Swem oxidation provided aldehyde 89. Reaction of 89 with the indicated Z-crotyl boronate according to Roush (See: Roush, W. R.; Hoong, L. K.; Palmer, M. A. J.; Straub, J. A.; Palkowitz, A. D. Asymmetric synthesis using tartrate modified allyl boronates. 2. Single and double asymmetric reactions with alkoxy-substituted aldehydes, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4117-4126) provided 90 in 63% isolated yield. PMB protection, ozonolysis and Wittig-Horner olefination then gave 91. This was converted to the E/Z diene 92 by DIBAL reduction, Dess-Martin oxidation, Still-Gennari olefination and desilylation with HF/pyridine.

FIG. 19 shows the synthesis of two fragments with anti/anti configurations as assigned to dictyostatin 1 at C13-C15. Evan anti-aldol reaction of ent-4 and methacrolein (See: Evans, D. A.; Tedrow, J. S.; Shaw, J. T.; Downey, C. W. Diastereoselective magnesium halide-catalyzed anti-aldol reactions of chiral N-acyloxazolidinones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 392-393) followed by TFA treatment gave 93 in 78% yield. A minor diastereomer of 93 (about 16/1 ratio) was separated by chromatography. Silylation of 93 followed by hydroboration and oxidation provided alcohol 94 in 75% yield alongside the lactone resulting from cyclization of the terminal hydroxyl group with displacement of the chiral auxiliary (not shown, 10% yield). Silylation of 94 and reductive cleavage of the auxiliary provided 95, which was oxidized to 96 by the Swem method. Related aldehyde 98 was made by Roush allylboration of ent-17 (see 17 in FIG. 3) with the indicated E-crotylborate (mismatched case, 4/1 selectivity) to give 97, followed by reaction with PMBBr and ozonolysis.

EXAMPLES

(4R)-4-Benzyl-3-[(2R,3R)-3-(tert-butyidimethylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethylpent-4-enoyl]oxazolidin-2-one (5). TBDMSOTf (3.44 mL, 15 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of aldol product (3.03 g, 10 mmol) and 1,6-lutidine (2.32 mL, 20 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(20 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The reaction was quenched by the addition of aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 50 mL). The resulting mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of solvent under reduced pressure. The product was purified by short column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1). Crude 5 was used without purification.

(2S,3R,4S,5R)-2-Allyl-6-methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran (8). Diisobutylaluminum hydride (1.0 M in THF, 3.3 mL, 3.3 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 7 (894 mg, 3 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(30 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at âˆ’78Â° C. and the resulting mixture was stirred for an additional 1 h at âˆ’78Â° C. The reaction was quenched by the careful addition of saturated aqueous potassium sodium tartrate (50 mL) and stirred for 3 h at room temperature. Once the organic and aqueous layers had separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure. The crude lactol was used for the next reaction without further purification.

A solution of the lactol and CSA (0.3 mmol) in MeOH was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with saturated NaHCO₃(50 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was used for the next reaction.

N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (7.5 mL) and chloromethyl methyl ether (1.13 mL, 15 mmol) were added to a solution of the alcohol in CH₂Cl₂(15 mL). The reaction mixture was heated to reflux and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched with aqueous saturated NaHCO₃(50 mL) followed by washing with brine. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) to provide the pure anomers of 8 (Î², 33%; Î±, 32%). {overscore (Î²)}8: IR (CHCl₃) 3053, 2985, 2305, 1422, 1264 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 6.04 (m, 1H), 5.20-5.10 (m, 2H), 4.81 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 4.73 (d, 1H, J=2.37 Hz), 4.67 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz), 3.62 (m, 2H), 3.55 (s, 3H), 2.47 (m, 1H), 2.30 (m, 1H), 2.16 (m, 1H), 1.85 (m, 1H), 1.03 (d, 3H, J=7.1 Hz), 0.97 (d, 3H, J=6.8 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 135.1, 116.4, 101.3, 95.9, 81.9, 75.8, 56.4, 55.7, 37.5, 37.3, 33.6, 13.2, 9.9; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₁₃H₂₄O₄244.1596, found 244.1592. {overscore (Î±)}8: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 6.00 (m, 1H), 5.22-5.12 (m, 2H), 4.83 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 4.69 (d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz), 4.49 (d, 1H, J=1.8 Hz), 3.88 (dt, 1H, J=3.6, 8.8 Hz), 3.53 (t, 2H, J=3.6 Hz), 3.48 (s, 3H), 2.45 (m, 1H), 2.28-2.11 (m, 3H), 1.94 (m, 1H), 1.12 (d, 3H, J=7.3 Hz), 1.00 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 135.2, 116.7, 103.4, 95.6, 78.7, 69.6, 55.7, 37.2, 35.8, 33.6, 15.9, 13.5.

(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-3-(6-Methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl)propionaldehyde (9a). BH₃.Me₂S (1 M in THF, 3 mL, 3 mmol) was added to a solution of 8 (488 mg, 2 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at 0Â° C. with stirring. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The reaction was quenched with 2N aqueous NaOH (10 mL) followed by H₂O₂(30%, 3 mL). After 1 h, the mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) to yield 392 mg (75%) of alcohol as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3103, 2982, 1375, 1240 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 4.83 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 4.76 (d, 1H, J=2.4 Hz), 4.69 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 3.75 (t, 2H, J=5.4 Hz), 3.61 (t, 1H, J=2.7 Hz), 3.57 (s, 3H), 2.58 (br s, 1H), 2.17 (m, 1H), 1.90-1.80 (m, 4H), 1.04 (d, 3H, J=7.1 Hz), 0.97 (d, 3H, J=6.8 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 101.5, 96.0, 82.0, 75.9, 62.8, 56.6, 55.8, 37.6, 34.0, 29.4, 28.6, 13.4, 9.8; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₁₃H₂₆O₅262.1780, found 262.1792.

Pyridinium sulfurtrioxide (477 mg, 3 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alcohol (262 mg, 1 mmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.52 mL, 3 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(6 mL) and DMSO (12 mL) at 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was stirred at the ambient temperature for 1 h. The mixture was diluted with ethyl ether (50 mL) and washed with aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 50 mL) and brine (10 ml). The organic layer was dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. Flash silica gel column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to remove SO₃-pyridine residue provided the crude aldehyde 9a as a colorless oil which was used without further purification.

(4R)-4-Benzyl-3-[(2R,3S)-3-(tert-butyldi methylsilyloxy)-6-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2-methylhexanoyl]oxazolidin-2-one (11). Pyridinium sulfur trioxide (7.15 g, 45 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of the mono-PMB-protected alcohol 10 (3.15 g, 15 mmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (8.0 mL, 45 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(15 mL) and DMSO (30 mL) at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 h, diluted with ethyl ether (300 mL) and washed with aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 200 mL), and brine. The separated organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration provided the crude aldehyde 10 as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification.

N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (1.9 mL, 11 mmol) was added to a solution of propionyloxaiolidinone (2.33 g, 10 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(110 mL) at 0Â° C., followed by dropwise addition of Bu₂BOTf (1.0 M in CH₂Cl₂, 11 mL, 11 mmol). The solution was stirred for 0.5 h at 0Â° C. Crude 10 in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(30 mL) was added at âˆ’78Â° C. The mixture was stirred for 10 min at âˆ’78Â° C. followed by an additional 2 h at 0Â° C. The reaction was quenched by addition of phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (50 mL). A solution of hydrogen peroxide (30%, 10 mL) in methanol (20 mL) was added and the mixture was allowed to stir for 1 h at 0Â° C. After separation of organic and aqueous layers, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to yield the aldol adduct (3.83 g, 87%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3472, 2954, 2860, 2252, 1778, 1691, 1383 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.48-7.36 (m, 7H), 7.01 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.58 (m, 1H), 4.33 (s, 2H), 4.18 (br s, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.91 (m, 1H), 3.63 (t, 2H, J=6.0 Hz), 3.40 (dd, 1H, J=3.2, 13.3 Hz), 3.37 (br s, 1H), 2.90 (dd, 1H, J=3.8, 13.3 Hz), 1.97-1.59 (m, 5H), 1.40 (d, 3H, J=7.2 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 177.3, 159.2, 153.1, 135.3, 130.6, 129.5, 129.3, 129.0, 127.4, 113.8, 72.5, 71.5, 69.9, 66.2, 55.2, 42.7, 37.7, 31.3, 26.4, 14.3, 11.1; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₅H₃₁NO₆441.2151, found 441.2162.

TBDMSOTf (1.7 mL, 7.5 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of the above alcohol (2.20 g, 5 mmol) and 2,6-lutidine (1.2 mL, 10 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(50 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The reaction was quenched by addition of aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 100 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure. The product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to yield 11: IR (CHCl₃) 3020, 2955, 2858, 1779, 1362, 1211 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.45-7.36 (m, 7H), 7.00 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.70 (m, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H), 4.27-4.15 (m, 3H), 4.04 (dd, 1H, J=5.4, 6.8), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.60 (m, 3H), 3.40 (dd, 1H, J=3.0, 13.2 Hz), 2.90 (dd, 1H, J=9.5, 13.2 Hz), 1.80 (br m, 4H), 1.38 (d, 3H, J=6.8 Hz), 1.05 (s, 9H), 0.21 (s, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 175.4, 159.2, 153.2, 135.5, 130.9, 129.6, 129.3, 129.0, 127.4, 113.8, 72.9, 72.5, 70.2, 66.1, 55.9, 55.3, 42.8, 37.7, 32.1, 26.0, 25.2, 18.2, 12.2, âˆ’3.92, âˆ’4.65; LRMS (ESI) 578.3 (M+Na).

(2S,3S)-3-(tert-Butyidimethylsilanyloxy)-6-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2-methylhexan-1-ol. Lithium borohydride (2.0 M in THF, 5 mL, 10 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 11 (2.77 g, 5 mmol) and methanol (0.4 mL, 10 mmol) in anhydrous THF (20 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at 0Â° C. and then warmed to ambient temperature. After 3 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with aqueous NH₄Cl (100 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—20 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) to yield the alcohol (1.48 g, 78%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2948, 2856, 2302, 1612, 1265 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.27 (d, 2H, J=8.5 Hz), 7.00 (d, 2H, J=8.5 Hz), 4.43 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.67 (dd, 1H, J=8.6, 10.5 Hz), 3.51-3.41 (m, 3H), 2.78 (br s, 1H), 1.94 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.49 (m, 4H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.81 (d, 3H, J=7.0 Hz), 0.09 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 159.2, 130.6, 129.3, 113.8, 75.4, 72.6, 70.1, 65.8, 55.9, 55.3, 39.7, 29.1, 26.6, 25.9, 18.0, 12.1, âˆ’4.28, âˆ’4.38; LRMS (ESI) 405.2 (M+Na).

(4R)-4-Benzyl-3-[(2R,3S,4R,5S)-5-(tert-butyldi methylsilanyloxy)-3-hydroxy-8-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2,4-dimethyloctanoyl]oxazolidin-2-one (12). Pyridinium sulfur trioxide (2.38 g, 15 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of the above TBS-protected alcohol (1.91 g, 5 mmol) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (2.65 mL, 15 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(5 mL) and DMSO (10 mL) at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred at the ambient temperature for 1 h, diluted with ethyl ether (100 mL), washed with aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 100 mL) and brine, then dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration provided the crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used without further purification.

N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (0.97 mL, 5.5 mmol) was added to a solution of propionyloxazolidinone (1.16 g, 5 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(11 mL) at 0Â° C., followed by dropwise addition of Bu₂BOTf (1.0 M in CH₂Cl₂, 5.5 mL, 5.5 mmol). The solution was stirred for 0.5 h at 0Â° C. A solution of crude aldehyde 12 from above in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) was added at âˆ’78Â° C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min at âˆ’78Â° C. then for 2 h at 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was quenched with phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (50 mL). A solution of hydrogen peroxide (30%, 10 mL) in methanol (20 mL) was slowly added and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. After the separation of organic and aqueous layers, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to yield desired compound (2.29 g, 75%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2949, 2855, 2253, 1779, 1692, 1463 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.33-7.19 (m, 7H), 7.01 (d, 2H, J=8.1 Hz), 4.42 (m, 1H), 4.44 (s, 2H), 4.16 (d, 1H, J=5.1 Hz), 4.01 (m, 1H), 3.95 (t, 1H, J=6.3 Hz), 3.85 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.43 (br s, 2H), 3.24 (br s, 1H), 3.20 (dd, 1H, J=2.4, 13.5 Hz), 2.77 (dd, 1H, J=9.6, 13.2 Hz), 1.56-1.31 (m, 5H), 1.32 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 0.95 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.08 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 177.2, 159.2, 152.7, 135.1, 130.6, 129.5, 129.3, 129.0, 127.5, 113.8, 76.8, 74.2, 72.6, 70.0, 66.1, 55.3, 55.0, 40.6, 38.1, 37.8, 31.3, 25.9, 18.1, 13.2, 7.4, âˆ’3.5, âˆ’4.6; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₃₄H₅₁NO₇Si 613.3435, found 613.3427.

(4R)-4-Benzyl-3-[(2R,3S,4R,5S)-5-(tert-butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-8-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-3-methoxymethoxy-2,4-dimethyloctanoyl]oxazolidin-2-one (13). N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (7.5 mL) and chloromethyl methyl ether (mL, 9 mmol) were added to a solution of the alcohol from above (1.83 g, 3 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(15 mL). The mixture was stirred at reflux overnight. The reaction was quenched with aqueous sat'd NaHCO₃(50 mL) and washed with brine. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to provide the pure product in 92% yield: IR (CHCl₃) 3020, 2862, 1781, 1215 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.36-7.27 (m, 7H), 6.94 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.75 (s, 2H), 4.69 (m, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 4.19 (dd, 1H, J=10.2, 15.0 Hz), 3.97 (dd, 1H, J=3.0, 6.6 Hz), 3.84 (br s, 4H), 3.43 (br t, 2H), 3.45 (s, 3H), 3.30 (dd, 1H, J=3.0, 13.2 Hz), 2.77 (dd, 1H, J=9.3, 13.5 Hz), 1.81-1.75 (m, 5H), 1.36 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 1.02 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 0.98 (s, 9H), 0.16 (s, 3H), 0.15 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 175.5, 159.1, 153.0, 135.4, 131.0, 129.5, 129.2, 129.0, 127.4, 113.7, 98.3, 80.3, 76.9, 73.2, 72.3, 70.5, 66.0, 56.3, 55.6, 55.2, 41.7, 40.8, 37.6, 30.6, 26.1, 24.2, 18.3, 14.0, 10.5, âˆ’3.9, âˆ’4.3; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₃₄H₅₀NO₇Si (Mâˆ’CH₂OCH₃) 612.3356, found 612.3367 (Mâˆ’CH₂OCH₃).

6-[(3R,4S,5S,6S)-3-(4-Methoxybenzyloxy)propyl]-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-one (14). HF-pyridine (6 mL) was added to a solution of 13 (1.31 g, 2 mmol) in MeOH (20 mL) and pyridine (10 mL) at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h, diluted with EtOAc (100 mL), washed with aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 2Ã—50 mL) and with brine. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to provide the pure product in 83% yield: IR (CHCl₃) 3020, 2952, 1730, 1513, 1216 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.24 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 6.87 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.72 (d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz), 4.60 (d, 1H, J=7.2 Hz), 4.48 (m, 1H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.50-3.39 (m, 2H), 3.39 (s, 3H), 3.26 (dd, 1H, J=1.1, 7.0 Hz), 2.58 (t, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 2.03 (d, 1H, J=7.5 Hz), 1.81-1.63 (m, 4H), 1.31 (d, 3H, J=6.7 Hz), 0.91 (d, 3H, J=7.3 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 174.1, 159.2, 130.5, 129.3, 113.8, 95.5, 82.6, 76.7, 72.6, 69.4, 55.9, 55.3, 40.5, 38.4, 28.6, 26.0, 14.4, 11.9, âˆ’3.9; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₀H₃₀O₆366.2042, found 366.2050.

2-Methoxy-6-[(3R,4S,5S,6S)-3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)propyl]-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran (15). Diisobutylaluminum hydride (1.0 M in THF, 2.2 mL, 2.2 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 14 (732 mg, 2 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(20 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at âˆ’78Â° C. and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at âˆ’78Â° C. The reaction was quenched by the careful addition of aqueous sat'd potassium sodium tartrate (50 mL) and stirring for 3 h at room temperature. Once the organic and aqueous layers separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of solvent under reduced pressure. The crude lactol obtained was used without further purification.

A solution of the lactol and PPTS (0.2 mmol) in MeOH was stirred for 15 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with sat'd aqueous NaHCO₃(50 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) to provide the pure product each anomer 15 (Î², 64%; Î±, 26%). Î²-15: IR (CHCl₃) 3020, 2858, 2299, 1514, 1216 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.35 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 6.95 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.76 (d, 2H, J=3.0 Hz), 4.52 (s, 2H), 4.37 (d, 1H, J=4.6 Hz), 4.09 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 2H), 3.57 (m, 2H), 3.47 (s, 3H), 3.32 (t, 1H, J=5.7 Hz), 1.89-1.71 (m, 6H), 1.16 (d, 3H, J=7.2 Hz), 1.07 (d, 3H, J=7.9 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 159.2, 130.7, 129.3, 113.8, 103.2, 96.3, 82.0, 72.6, 69.9, 69.3, 55.7, 55.3, 39.1, 38.0, 27.1, 26.5, 16.0, 13.1; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₁H₃₄O₆382.2353, found 382.2355. Î±-15: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.34 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 6.95 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.72 (s, 2H), 4.70 (d, 1H, J=2.8 Hz), 4.52 (s, 2H), 4.09 (br m, 4H), 3.67 (br s, 1H), 3.56 (m, 5H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 2.08-1.54 (m, 6H), 1.11 (d, 3H, J=3.0 Hz), 1.08 (d, 3H, J=2.9 Hz).

(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-3-(6-Methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl)propionaldehyde (9b). A mixture of PMB ether 15 (458 mg, 1.2 mmol) and palladium (10% Pd/C, 5 mg) was stirred in EtOAc (12 mL) for 3 h at room temperature under an H₂atmosphere (balloon), filtered and concentrated to yield the debenzylated alcohol which was used without further purification.

The crude alcohol in CH₂Cl₂(12 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (636 mg, 1.5 mmol) at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO₃(20 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(10 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) provided 274 mg (88%) of the crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used without further purification: ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.80 (s, 1H), 4.67 (dd, 2H, J=7.0, 12.5 Hz), 4.27 (d, 1H, J=4.5 Hz), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J=3.5, 4.0 Hz), 3.36 (s, 6H), 3.24 (t, 1H, J=6.0 Hz), 2.61 (m, 1H), 2.52 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m, 3H), 1.68 (m, 1H), 1.05 (d, 3H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.01 (d, 3H, J=7.5 Hz).

(2S,3R,4S)-5-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethylpentane-1,3-diol. MeOH (0.51 mL) and LiBH₄(2.0 M in THF, 6.2 mL, 12.4 mmol) were added dropwise to a stirred solution of aldol product 18 [22] (5.38 g, 12.3 mmol) in THF (50 mL) at 0Â° C. After stirring for 1 h at 0Â° C., saturated aqueous sodium potassium tartrate (70 mL) was added. The mixture was allowed to warm room temperature and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—50 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine (40 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, concentrated and flash column chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to yield 2.99 g (92%) of the desired product as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3409, 2958, 2927, 2853, 2878, 1469, 1385, 1361, 1252, 1082, 838, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 4.45 (br s, 1H), 3.54 (br s, 1H), 1.92 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.06 (d, 3H, J=6.98 Hz), 1.00 (s, 9H), 0.84 (d, 3H, J=6.88 Hz), 0.19 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 79.3, 69.7, 67.5, 37.4, 36.6, 25.9, 18.1, 12.8, 8.9, âˆ’5.5, âˆ’5.6; LRMS (EI) 263 (M+H); HRMS (EI) calcd for C₁₃H₃₀O₃Si 263.2042, found 263.2042; [Î±]²⁰_D+35.5 (c 0.85, CHCl₃).

(2S)-tert-Butyl-{(4R,5S)-2-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl[1,3]dioxan-4-yl]propoxy}dimethylsilane (20). A solution of the above diol (2.8 g, 10.7 mmol), p-anisaldehyde dimethylacetal (2.0 mL, 11.7 mmol) and PPTS (0.27 g, 1.1 mmol) in benzene was heated to reflux for 3 h. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to give 20 (2.6 g, 6.8 mmol) in 64% yield: IR (CHCl₃) 2955, 2927, 2853, 1617, 1518, 1459, 1382, 1157, 1101, 1033, 826 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.49 (m, 2H), 6.98 (m, 2H), 5.50 (m, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.82 (dd, 1H, J=10.9, 4.9 Hz), 3.76 (dd, 2H, J=8.1, 2.8 Hz), 1.87 (m, 1H), 1.71 (m, 1H), 1.23 (d, 3H, J=7.6 Hz), 1.00 (d, 3H, J=6.5 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 160.1, 132.1, 127.6, 113.8, 113.7, 101.9, 80.1, 74.3, 65.2, 64.3, 55.5, 37.4, 30.0, 26.3, 26.2, 18.7, 12.4, 11.3, âˆ’5.0, âˆ’5.1; LRMS (EI) 323, 207, 187, 157, 145, 121, 75; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₁H₃₆O₄Si₁323.1678 (Mâˆ’^tBu), found 323.1694 (Mâˆ’^tBu); [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’33.6 (c 1.24, CHCl₃).

(2S)-2-[(4R,5S)-2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl[1,3]dioxan-4-yl]propan-1-ol. TBAF (11.0M in THF, 22 mL, 22 mmol) was added to a solution of 20 (2.8 g, 7.3 mmol) in THF (70 mL) at room temperature and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The mixture was diluted with ethyl ether (100 mL) and brine. The organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) provided alcohol (1.95 g, 7.2 mmol) as a yellow oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3428, 2964, 2930, 2835, 1614, 1512, 1463, 1391, 1249, 1098, 1027 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.38 (m 2H), 6.87 (m, 2H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 4.11 (dd, 2H, J=4.6, 4.5 Hz), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.73 (m, 2H), 3.52 (apparent t, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 2.08 (m, 1H), 2.00 (m, 1H), 1.04 (d, 3H, J=7.1 Hz), 0.77 (d, 3H, J=6.7 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 160.0, 131.5, 127.4, 113.6, 101.6, 83.4, 73.9, 66.3, 55.2, 36.8, 30.4, 11.9, 9.9; LRMS (EI) 266, 207, 177, 153, 135, 77; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₁₅H₂₂O₄266.1518, found 266.1517; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’4.8 (c 0.67, CHCl₃).

(2S)-{2-[(4R,5S)-2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl[1,3]dioxan-4-yl]propyltriphenyl-â–¡5-phosphane iodide (21). I₂(4.48 g, 17.6 mmol) was added at 0Â° C. to a solution of the alcohol from above (2.35 g, 8.82 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(110 mL) containing imidazole (1.32 g, 19.4 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (4.63 g, 17.6 mmol). The resulting slurry was stirred for 1 h and quenched with saturated aqueous Na₂S₂O₃(10 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with water (20 mL), brine and dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to give the pure iodide.

The iodide was quickly dissolved in benzene (44 mL), PPh₃was added (11.5 g, 44.1 mmol) and the mixture heated to reflux for 36 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and anhydrous ethyl ether (50 mL) was added, whereupon a white solid precipitated. Filtration followed by washing of the solid with ethyl ether (10 mL) provided the phosphonium salt (4.5 g) as a white foam: IR (CHCl₃) 3054, 2961, 2909, 1611, 1515, 1435, 1246, 1107, 993, 752 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.55 (m, 9H), 7.37 (m, 6H), 7.21 (m, 2H), 6.65 (m, 1H), 5.41 (s, 1H), 3.95 (d, 1H, J=10.2 Hz), 3.68 (d, 2H, J=12.3 Hz), 3.54 (s, 3H), 3.26 (m, 1H), 1.85 (m, 1H), 1.46 (apparent d, 1H, J=6.5 Hz), 0.78 (d, 3H, J=6.8 Hz), 0.44 (d, 3H, J=6.6 Hz); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 160.0, 135.2, 135.1, 133.7, 133.5, 131.1, 130.5, 130.4, 127.9, 119.0, 117.9, 113.5, 101.9, 82.3, 82.1, 73.2, 55.5, 30.7, 29.2, 25.3, 15.7, 10.4 HRMS (EI) calcd for C₃₃H₃₆O₃P 511.2402, found 511.2428; [Î±]²⁰_D+31.9 (c 0.78, CHCl₃).

(4R,5R)-tert-Butyl-{3-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl[1,3]dioxan-4-yl]propoxy}dimethylsilane (26). Lithium borohydride (2.0 M in THF, 25 mL, 50 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 25 (8.70 g, 20 mmol) and MEOH (1.61 mL, 40 mmol) in anhydrous THF (100 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at 0Â° C. and then warmed to ambient temperature. After 2 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with aqueous NH₄Cl (100 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) to yield 4.97 g (95%) of the diol as a colorless oil.

A solution of the diol (2.62 g, 10 mmol), anisaldehyde dimethyl acetal (2.00 g, 11.0 mmol), and PPTS (0.1 equiv) in benzene was stirred for 15 h at reflux. The reaction mixture was quenched with aqueous sat'd NaHCO₃(50 mL) followed by washing with water. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (2Ã—50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 7:3) to provide the pure 26 in 72% yield: IR (CHCl₃) 2992, 1742, 1373, 1240 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.43 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 6.88 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 5.45 (s, 1H), 4.08 (dd, 2H, J=10.5, 29.9 Hz), 3.90 (br s, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.67 (m, 2H), 1.67-1.50 (m, 5H), 1.17 (d, 3H, J=7.0 Hz), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.06 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 159.9, 131.6, 127.4, 113.6, 101.7, 79.7, 73.9, 63.1, 55.3, 31.8, 29.3, 28.7, 26.0, 18.4, 11.1, âˆ’5.1; LRMS (ESI) 402.68 (M+Na).

(4R,5S)-4-{(1S,2Z)-5-[(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-6-Methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-1-methylpent-2-enyl}-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl[1,3]dioxane (35). NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 1.1 mL, 1.1 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of the salt 21 (701 mg, 1.1 mmol) in dry THF (2.2 mL) at 0Â° C. The resulting red solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 9a (260 mg, 1 mmol) in THF (1 mLÃ—2) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h at room temperature, the mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (10 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/ether 9:1) to yield 329 mg (67%) of 35 as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2922, 2866, 2628, 2350, 1740, 1516 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.45 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 6.88 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 5.46 (m, 2H), 5.30 (t, 1H, J=9.9 Hz), 4.77 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 4.70 (d, 1H, J=1.8 Hz), 4.63 (d, 1H, J=6.9 Hz), 4.06 (br d, 1H, J=2.1 Hz), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.54 (m, 3H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.32 (s, 3H), 2.77 (m, 1H), 2.31 (dd, 2H, J=7.5, 14.7 Hz), 1.79-1.55 (m, 4H), 1.22 (d, 3H, J=6.6 Hz), 1.02 (d, 3H, J=7.2 Hz), 0.96 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 0.86 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.7, 133.4, 131.8, 130.1, 127.3, 113.3, 101.5, 101.3, 95.9, 83.5, 82.0, 75.2, 73.9, 56.4, 55.7, 55.2, 37.6, 34.2, 33.6, 33.0, 30.0, 23.4, 16.1, 13.3, 11.2, 9.9; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₇H₄₀O₆460.2824, found 460.2846.

(4R,5S)-4-{(1S,2Z)-5-[(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-Methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-1-methylpent-2-enyl}-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl[1,3]dioxane (36). NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 1.1 mL, 1.1 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of the salt 21 (0.70 g, 1.1 mmol) in dry THF (2 mL) at 0Â° C. The resulting red solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 9b (260 mg, 1 mmol) in THF (1 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (10 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/ether 9:1) to yield 329 mg (67%) of 36 as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2922, 2866, 2628, 2350, 1740, 1516 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.48 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz), 6.91 (d, 2H, J=9.0 Hz), 5.46 (m, 2H), 5.32 (t, 1H, J=9.6 Hz), 4.73 (s, 2H), 4.31 (d, 1H, J=5.4 Hz), 4.07 (br s, 2H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 3.57 (dd, 1H, J=1.8, 9.6 Hz), 3.45 (s, 3H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.20 (t, 1H, J=6.6 Hz), 2.77 (m, 1H), 2.31-2.17 (m, 2H), 1.90-1.62 (m, 4H), 1.24-0.98 (m, 12H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.7, 133.7, 131.7, 129.4, 127.2, 113.4, 102.8, 101.5, 96.6, 83.5, 82.2, 73.9, 70.0, 55.7, 55.2, 39.8, 38.4, 33.6, 30.0, 29.9, 24.3, 15.9, 15.5, 13.2, 11.1; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₇H₄₀O₆(Mâˆ’HOCH₃) 460.2824, found 460.2846.

(2R,3S,4S,5Z)-3-(4-Methoxybenzyloxy)-8-[(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-6-methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,4-dimethyloct-5-enal (37). DIBAL (1.0 M in hexane, 2.1 mL, 2.1 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of the acetal 35 (329 mg, 0.67 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂(6.7 mL) at 0Â° C. After stirring for 2 h, the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous sodium tartrate (20 mL) followed by vigorously stirring for several hours. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL). The residue obtained after drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum was dissolved in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(6 mL) and DMSO (12 mL), treated with N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.52 mL, 3 mmol), cooled to 0Â° C. and treated with pyridinium sulfur trioxide (477 mg, 3 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 h, diluted with ethyl ether (50 mL) and washed with aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 50 mL) and brine (10 ml). The separated organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) provided the crude aldehyde 37 (270 mg, 0.55 mmol) as a colorless oil which was used without further purification.

(2R,3S,4S,5Z)-3-(4-Methoxybenzyloxy)-8-[(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,4-dimethyloct-5-enal (38). DIBAL (1.0 M in hexane, 2.1 mL, 2.1 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of the acetal 36 (329 mg, 0.67 mmol) in dry CH₂Cl₂(6.7 mL) at 0Â° C. After the mixture was stirred for 2 h, the reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous sodium tartrate (20 mL) followed by vigorous stirring for several hours. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, the residue was used for the next reaction without further purification. The crude alcohol in CH₂Cl₂(13 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (340.8 mg, 0.80 mmol). After the reaction was complete, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(20 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—10 mL) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) provided crude aldehyde 38 (267 mg, 81%) as a colorless oil which was used without further purification.

(2S,3R)-6-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2-methylhexanal (27). DIBAL (1.0 M in THF, 15 mL, 15 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 26 (1.90 g, 5 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(50 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at 0Â° C. and the mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0Â° C. The reaction was quenched by the careful addition of aqueous sat'd potassium sodium tartrate (100 mL) and stirring for 3 h at room temperature. Once the aqueous and organic layers separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂. The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure. The crude alcohol (1.56 g, 4.1 mmol) was used without further purification.

Pyridinium sulfur trioxide (2.38 g, 15 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of the crude alcohol from above and diisopropylethylamine (2.6 mL, 15 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) and DMSO (20 mL) at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 h. After the reaction was complete, the mixture was diluted with ethyl ether (100 mL) and washed with aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 100 mL) and brine (100 ml). The separated organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to remove SO₃-pyridine provided the crude aldehyde 27 as a colorless oil which was used without further purification.

(2R,3R,4R,5R)-8-(tert-Butyldi methylsilanyloxy)-3-hydroxy-5-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2,4-dimethyloctanoic acid, 2,6-dimethylphenyl ester (29). LDA (2M in THF, 3.1 mL, 6.2 mmol) was added to a solution of 2,6-dimethylphenoxy propionate (1.10 g, 6.2 mmol) in anhydrous THF (12.4 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C., followed by stirring for 1 h at âˆ’78Â° C. The crude aldehyde 27 (4.1 mmol) from above dissolved in anhydrous THF (10 mL) was added slowly at âˆ’78Â° C. After 2 h at room temperature, the mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous NH₄Cl (10 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to yield 29 (1.67 g, 2.99 mmol) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃). 3120, 2857, 1744, 1514, 1216, 1099 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.26 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 6.87 (d, 2H, J=8.4 Hz), 4.62 (d, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 4.40 (d, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 4.06 (d, 1H, J=6.8 Hz), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.66-3.61 (m, 3H), 2.89 (m, 1H), 2.19 (s, 6H), 1.86 (m, 2H), 1.55 (m, 3H), 1.27 (d, 3H, J=6.8 Hz), 1.01 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.07 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 173.5, 159.2, 148.0, 130.0, 129.9, 129.4, 128.4, 125.6, 113.8, 83.5, 70.7, 62.9, 55.1, 44.0, 35.6, 28.7, 26.6, 25.8, 18.2, 16.3, 14.2, 5.7, âˆ’5.3; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₃₂H₅₀O₆Si 558.3377, found 558.3392.

(2S,3S,4R,5R)-3,8-Bis-(tert-butyidimethylsilanyloxy)-5-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2,4-dimethyloctan-1-ol. TBDMSOTf (0.68 mL, 3 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 29 (1.11 g, 2 mmol) and 2,6-lutidine (0.69 mL, 6 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(20 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The reaction was quenched by the addition of aqueous HCl (0.5 N, 50 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂, dried over MgSO₄and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Short column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) provided the crude product.

DIBAL (1.0 M in THF, 6 mL, 6 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of the TBS-protected aryl ester (1.90 g, 2 mmol) from above in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(20 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at 0Â° C. and the mixture was stirred for additional 1 h at 0Â° C. The reaction was quenched by the careful addition of aqueous sat'd potassium sodium tartrate (50 mL). The mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature. Once the aqueous and organic layers had separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(20 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane/EtOAc 3:7) to give pure (997 mg, 1.8 mmol): IR (CHCl₃) 3125, 1544, 1289, 1065 cm^âˆ’1, ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.28 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 6.89 (d, 2H, J=8.7 Hz), 4.51 (d, 1H, J=11.1), 4.41 (d, 1H, J=10.8 Hz), 3.83 (d, 3H), 3.79 (m, 1H), 3.64 (m, 4H), 3.36 (m, 1H), 2.45 (br s, 1H), 1.93 (m, 2H), 1.63 (m, 4H), 1.00 (d, 2H, J=7.0 Hz), 0.92 (s, 24H), 0.14 (s, 6H), 0.13 (s, 6H); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.1, 130.6, 129.4, 113.6, 80.3, 76.0, 71.2, 65.2, 63.0, 55.1, 39.1, 39.0, 29.0, 27.1, 26.1, 25.9, 18.2, 14.5, 11.6, âˆ’3.6, âˆ’3.9, âˆ’5.3; LRMS (ESI) 576.8 (M+Na).

(2R,3S,4R,5R)-3,8-Bis-(tert-butyidimethylsilanyloxy)-5-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2,4-dimethyloctanal (30). Pyridinium sulfurtrioxide (858 mg, 5.4 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of alcohol (997 mg, 1.8 mmol) from above and diisopropylethylamine (0.94 mL, 5.4 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(3.6 mL) and DMSO (7.2 mL) at 0Â° C. The mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 h. After the reaction was complete, the mixture was diluted with ethyl ether (50 mL) and washed with aqueous HCl (0.5N, 50 mL) and brine (10 ml). The organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to remove SO₃-pyridine provided the crude aldehyde 30 as a colorless oil which was used without further purification: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.69 (s, 1H), 7.22 (d, 2H, J=8.6 Hz), 6.85 (d, 2H, J=8.6 Hz), 4.45 (d, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 4.28 (d, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 3.94 (dd, 1H, J=5.5, 4.0 Hz), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.60 (t, 2H, J=6.0 Hz), 3.40-3.34 (m, 1H), 2.66-2.58 (m, 1H), 1.92-1.84 (m, 1H), 1.67-1.59 (m, 2H), 1.55-1.45 (m, 2H), 1.02 (d, 3H, J=7.0 Hz), 0.98 (d, 3H, J=7.0 Hz), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.86 (s, 9H), 0.05 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 9H).

(1R,2R,3S,4S,5Z)-1-{3-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-1-[3-(tert-butyldi methylsilanyloxy)propyl]-2,4-dimethylocta-5,7-dienyloxymethyl}-4-methoxybenzene (32). CrCl₂(1.09 g, 9.0 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of the crude aldehyde (1.8 mmol) from above and 1-bromoallyl trimethylsilane 31 (578 mg, 5.4 mmol) in anhydrous THF (18 mL) under an atmosphere of N₂at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for 14 h at ambient temperature, then diluted with ethyl ether followed by filtration through Celite. After the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure, the residue was purified by short silica gel column chromatography (CH₂Cl₂). The resulting residue was used without further purification.

The above product in THF (50 mL) was cooled to 0Â° C. and NaH (95% w/w, 207 mg, 9.0 mmol) was added in one portion. The ice bath was removed after 15 min and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0Â° C., quenched with H₂O (10 mL) and extracted with ethyl ether (2Ã—50 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to give pure 32 (622 mg, 1.2 mmol): IR (CHCl₃) 2954, 2931, 2857, 1608, 1513, 1463, 1251, 1098, 1047 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.35 (d, 2H, J=8.6 Hz), 6.96 (d, 2H, J=8.6 Hz), 6.41 (ddd, 1H, J=16.7, 11.0, 10.1 Hz), 6.04 (dd, 1H, J=11.1, 11.0 Hz), 5.57 (dd, 1H, J=10.1, 16.8 Hz), 5.20 (d, 1H, J=16.7 Hz), 5.06 (d, 1H, J=10.1 Hz), 4.51 (d, 1H, J=11.3 Hz), 4.35 (d, 1H, J=11.3 Hz), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.63-3.57 (m, 3H), 3.28 (dt, 1H, J=5.5, 5.5 Hz), 2.70 (ddq, 1H, J=10.3, 6.9, 3.2 Hz), 1.73-1.58 (m, 3H), 1.50-1.44 (m, 2H), 0.94 (d, 3H, J=6.9 Hz), 0.93-0.91 (m, 21H), 0.06 (s, 6H), 0.05 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 159.1, 134.8, 132.5, 131.0, 129.5, 128.9, 117.1, 113.7, 78.9, 76.6, 70.7, 63.2, 55.2, 40.0, 36.4, 31.6, 28.7, 26.2, 26.0, 18.9, 18.5, 18.3, 10.9, âˆ’3.3, âˆ’3.4, âˆ’5.3; LRMS (EI) 576, 519, 467, 387, 357, 293, 225, 121; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₉H₅₁O₄Si₂519.3326, found 519.3332; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’18.8Â° (c 0.75, CHCl₃).

(2R)-2-{(4R,5S,6R)-6-[3-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)propyl]-2,2,5-trimethyl[1,3]dioxan-4-yl}-propionic acid, 2,6-dimethylphenyl ester (34). A mixture of PMB ether 29 (55.8 mg, 0.1 mmol) and palladium (10% Pd/C, 5 mg) in EtOAc (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature under an H₂atmosphere (balloon) for 3 h. The mixture was filtered and concentrated to yield the diol which was used without further purification. A solution of the crude diol, dimethyl dimethyl acetal (12.4 mg, 0.12 mmol) and PPTS (0.1 equiv.) in benzene was stirred for 5 h at 65Â° C. The reaction was quenched with aqueous sat'd NaHCO₃(50 mL) followed by washing with water. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (2Ã—50 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO₄. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to provide the pure 34 in 52% yield: IR (CHCl₃) 2855, 1742, 1510, 1091 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.03 (br s, 3H), 4.20 (dd, 1H, J=1.7, 10.2 Hz), 3.91 (m, 1H), 3.64 (m, 2H), 2.91 (dq, 1H, J=10.2, 6.9 Hz), 2.16 (s, 6H), 1.59-1.32 (m, 6H), 1.41 (s, 3H), 1.39 (s, 3H), 1.24 (d, 3H, J=4.2 Hz), 0.92 (br s, 12H), 0.06 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 173.7, 148.2, 130.3, 128.5, 125.8, 99.1, 75.2, 73.0, 63.1, 42.3, 31.8, 29.9, 29.3, 28.8, 26.0, 19.5, 18.4, 16.4, 12.9, 4.54, âˆ’5.19; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₇H₄₆O₅Si 478.3115, found 463.2889 (Mâˆ’CH₃).

(1S,2S,3R,6Z,8S,9S,10S,11Z)-[3,9-Bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-14-[(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,8,10-trimethyl-1-[(1S,2Z)-1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl)tetradeca-6,11-dienyloxy]-tert-butyldimethylsilane. NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 0.54 mL, 0.54 mmol) was added slowly to a solution of the salt 33 (475.9 mg, 0.54 mmol) in dry THF (1.08 mL) at 0Â° C. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 38 (267 mg, 0.54 mmol) in THF (0.54 mLÃ—2) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h at room temperature the mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous NH₄Cl (10 mL) and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to yield the desired compound (257 mg, 0.28 mmol) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2920, 2861, 2620, 1740, 1520 cm^âˆ’1, ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) 7.38 (m, 4H), 6.96 (m, 4H), 6.47 (ddd, 1H, J=16.8, 11.0, 10.1 Hz), 6.04 (t, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 5.57 (t, 1H, J=10.5 Hz), 5.49-5.12 (m, 6H), 4.75 (d, 2H, J=2.1 Hz), 4.67-4.33 (m, 5H), 4.07 (m, 1H), 3.65 (dd, 1H, J=3.3, 6.0 Hz), 3.47 (br s, 7H), 3.35 (dd, 1H, J=4.5, 4.7 Hz), 3.27 (t, 1H, J=6.6 Hz), 3.15 (dd, 1H, J=4.5, 6.9 Hz), 2.77 (m, 3H), 2.18 (m, 2H), 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.74-1.62 (m, 4H), 1.11-0.99 (m, 18H), 0.12 (s, 6H); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 159.2, 159.0, 134.7, 133.7, 132.9, 132.5, 131.4, 131.0, 129.6, 129.1, 128.9, 128.6, 117.3, 113.8, 113.7, 103.0, 96.5, 88.0, 82.1, 78.8, 74.9, 70.8, 69.7, 55.8, 55.3, 40.0, 39.5, 38.3, 35.6, 35.4, 31.3, 30.3, 26.4, 24.2, 23.7, 19.0, 18.8, 18.6, 17.3, 15.7, 13.2, 11.0, âˆ’3.1, âˆ’3.2; LRMS (ESI) 942.5 (M+Na).

Carbamic acid, (1S,2S,3R,6Z,8S,9S,10S,11Z)-3,9-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-14-[(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,8,10-trimethyl-1-[(1S,2Z)-1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl]tetradeca-6,11-dienyl ester (39). The above compound (128.5 mg, 0.14 mmol) in THF (4 mL) was treated with TBAF (1.0 M in THF, 0.40 mL, 0.40 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. The mixture was diluted with ethyl ether (30 mL) and washed with water (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, the resulting alcohol was used without further purification.

A solution of the alcohol in CH₂Cl₂(8 mL) at 0Â° C. was treated with trichloroacetylisocyanate (0.05 mL, 0.42 mmol) and stirred at room temperature. After 30 min, the solution was concentrated under reduced pressure and the residue was taken up in MeOH (4 mL). K₂CO₃(50 mg) was added to this solution and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h at room temperature. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc (30 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc, and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous Na₂SO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 3:2) provided carbamate 39 (84.9 mg, 72%) as a yellow oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3100, 3019, 2430, 2286, 1720, 1524 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) 7.41 (m, 4H), 7.01 (m, 4H), 6.46 (ddd, 1H, J=16.8, 11.0, 10.1 Hz), 6.11 (t, 1H, J=10.8 Hz), 5.62 (t, 1H, J=10.5 Hz), 5.53-5.18 (m, 6H), 4.94 (t, 1H, J=6.0 Hz), 4.84 (br s, 2H), 4.81 (d, 2H, J=2.1 Hz), 4.71-4.45 (m, 4H), 4.39 (d, 1H, J=5.1 Hz), 4.12 (m, 1H), 3.37 (m, 2H), 3.19 (dd, 1H, J=4.5, 6.9 Hz), 2.90 (m, 3H), 2.27 (m, 2H), 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.74-1.61 (m, 4H), 1.11-0.99 (m, 18H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 159.2, 159.0, 157.1, 133.7, 133.3, 132.8, 132.2, 131.4, 130.9, 129.8, 129.6, 129.1, 128.5, 117.8, 113.8, 113.7, 102.9, 96.5, 88.0, 82.1, 78.4, 78.1, 74.9, 70.5, 69.8, 55.8, 55.7, 55.3, 39.5, 38.2, 37.7, 35.8, 35.4, 34.3, 30.6, 30.3, 24.2, 23.6, 18.9, 17.8, 17.4, 15.7, 13.2, 9.8; LRMS (ESI) 888.4 (M+K).

Carbamic acid, (1S,2S,3R,6Z,8S,9S,10S,11Z)-3,9-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-14-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyl-6-oxotetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,8,10-trimethyl-1-[(1S,2Z)-1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl]tetradeca-6,11-dienyl ester. A solution of 39 (42.4 mg, 0.05 mmol) in THF (0.5 mL) and 60% aqueous acetic acid (2.5 mL) was stirred at 70Â° C. for 4 h. After the reaction was complete by TLC, the mixture was neutralized slowly with saturated aqueous K₂CO₃and diluted with EtOAc (20 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude lactol was used for the next reaction without further purification.

Dess-Martin periodinane reagent (31.8 mg, 0.075 mmol) was added to a solution of the lactol in CH₂Cl₂(5 mL). The resultant solution was stirred for 1 h and quenched by the simultaneous addition of saturated aqueous Na₂S₂O₃(5 mL) and saturated aqueous NaHCO₃. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—10 mL) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 8:2) provided 28.3 mg (68%) of the lactone as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2992, 2361, 2332, 1742, 1374, 1242, 1047 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) 7.40 (m, 4H), 7.03 (m, 4H), 6.51 (ddd, 1H, J=16.8, 11.1, 10.0 Hz), 6.11 (t, 1H, J=11.1 Hz), 5.67 (t, 1H, J=10.8 Hz), 5.52-5.18 (m, 7H), 4.94 (t, 1H, J=6.0 Hz), 4.87-4.47 (m, 9H), 3.94 (br s, 4H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 3.40 (m, 2H), 3.19 (dd, 1H, J=4.5, 6.9 Hz), 2.87 (m, 2H), 2.72 (m, 2H), 2.32-1.89 (m, 7H), 1.45 (d, 3H, J=6.6 Hz), 1.15-01.02 (m, 15H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 174.2, 159.2, 159.0, 156.9, 133.6, 133.5, 133.4, 132.2, 131.3, 130.9, 129.8, 129.6, 129.5, 129.2, 128.7, 127.8, 113.8, 113.7, 95.4, 88.0, 82.7, 79.9, 78.4, 76.5, 75.0, 55.9, 55.7, 55.3, 40.5, 38.6, 37.7, 36.0, 35.4, 34.3, 31.3, 30.6, 23.9, 23.6, 23.5, 19.0, 17.8, 14.4, 12.1, 9.8; LRMS (ESI) 872.4 (M+K).

Carbamic acid, (1S,2S,3R,6Z,8S,9S,10S,11Z)-3,9-dihydroxy-14-[(2S,3S,4S,5R)-4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethyl-6-oxotetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,8,10-trimethyl-1-[(1S,2Z)-1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl]tetradeca-6,11-dienyl ester (40). A solution of the above lactone (2.83 mg, 0.005 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was treated with aqueous 4N HCl (1 mL). The flask was fitted with a glass stopper and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. Saturated aqueous K₂CO₃was added dropwise followed by EtOAc. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc and the combined extracts were dried over MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by simple short flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane/ether 3:2) provided the crude MOM-deprotected compound. A solution of PMB ether in CH₂Cl₂(2 mL) at 0Â° C. was treated with NaHCO₃(4.2 mg, 0.5 mmol). After 1 h, the mixture was diluted with CH₂Cl₂and washed with water. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 3:2) provided carbamate 40 (1.1 mg, 0.002 mmol) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2995, 2937, 2323, 1755, 1449, 1374, 1242, 1049 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) 6.63 (ddd, 1H, J=16.8, 11.0, 10.1 Hz), 6.06 (t, 1H, J=11.0 Hz), 5.46-5.32 (m, 5H), 5.25 (d, 1H, J=17 Hz), 5.14 (d, 1H, J=10.0 Hz), 4.94 (t, 1H, J=6.0 Hz), 4.74 9m, 1H), 4.60 (br s, 1H), 4.54 (m, 1H), 3.65 (m, 1H), 3.38 (d, 1H, J=5.0 Hz), 3.27 (t, 1H, J=6.0 Hz), 3.00 (m, 1H), 2.78 (m, 1H), 2.63 (m, 2H), 2.18 (m, 1H), 2.01 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.77 (m, 1H), 1.35 (d, 3H, J=7.0), 1.01-0.93 (m, 15H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) 174.2, 157.3, 133.6, 132.9, 129.6, 128.9, 125.0, 121.4, 118.0, 95.5, 82.6, 79.7, 79.2, 72.8, 55.9, 40.5, 39.9, 38.6, 35.4, 34.7, 31.6, 23.8, 19.2, 18.2, 17.7, 15.7, 14.8, 12.0; LRMS (ESI) 571.4 (M+Ka); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₃₁H₅₁NO₇Na 588.3303, found 588.3336 (M+K); [Î±]²⁰_D+34.0 (c 0.05, CHCl₃).

Carbamic acid, (1S,2S,3R,6Z,8S,9S,10S,11Z)-3,9-dihydroxy-14-1(2S,3S,4S,5R)-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyl-6-oxotetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,8,10-trimethyl-1-[(1S,2Z)-1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl]tetradeca-6,11-dienyl ester (41). Carbamate 39 (8.49 mg, 0.01 mmol) was subjected to the lactonization procedure described above. The removal of the PMB protecting group was accomplished by treating with NaHCO₃and DDQ. Flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 3:2) provided 41 (2.9 mg, 49% overall 3 steps) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3404, 2362, 1749, 1373, 1241, 1049 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) 6.62 (ddd, 1H, J=16.8, 11.0, 10.1 Hz), 6.04 (t, 1H, J=11.0 Hz), 5.48-5.33 (m, 5H), 5.24 (d, 1H, J=17 Hz), 5.13 (d, 1H, J=10.0 Hz), 4.77-4.60 (br m, 5H), 4.48 (m, 1H), 3.65 (m, 1H), 3.41 (s, 3H), 3.28 (d, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 3.23 (t, 1H, J=5.5 Hz), 3.02 (m, 1H), 2.62 (m, 2H), 2.25-2.18 (m, 3H), 2.04 (m, 2H), 1.90 (m, 1H), 1.88 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.77-1.67 (m, 2H), 1.51 (m, 2H), 1.34 (d, 3H, J=7.0), 1.02-0.92 (m, 15H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) 174.1, 157.3, 133.6, 132.9, 132.2, 129.6, 128.9, 125.0, 121.4, 118.0, 95.5, 82.6, 79.7, 79.2, 72.8, 55.9, 40.5, 39.8, 38.6, 35.4, 34.9, 34.7, 31.6, 23.8, 19.2, 18.2, 17.2, 15.7, 14.8, 12.0; LRMS (ESI) 616.3 (M+Na); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₃₃H₅₅NO₈Na 616.3825, found 616.3829 (M+Na); [Î±]²⁰_D+59.0 (c 0.1, CHCl₃).

Carbamic acid, (1S,2S,3R,6Z,8S,9S,1S,11Z)-3,9-dihydroxy-14-[(2S,3S,4S,5R,6R)-6-methoxy-4-methoxymethoxy-3,5-dimethyltetrahydropyran-2-yl]-2,8,10-trimethyl-1-[(1S,2Z)-1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl]tetradeca-6,11-dienyl ester (42). Carbamate 39 (4.25 mg, 0.005 mmol) was subjected to the deprotection procedure of PMB described in the preparation of 40. Flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 3:2) of the crude product provided 42 (2.8 mg, 92%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3115, 2749, 2328, 1676, 1508, 1215 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) 6.76 (ddd, 1H, J=16.8, 11.0, 10.1 Hz), 6.18 (t, 1H, J=10.8 Hz), 5.70-5.46 (m, 5H), 5.35 (d, 1H, J=16.8 Hz), 4.49 (dd, J=4.5, 6.6 Hz), 4.82 (d, 2H, J=2.4 Hz), 4.73 (br s, 2H), 4.43 (d, 1H, J=5.1 Hz), 4.15, (m, 1H), 3.78 (m, 1H), 3.56 (s, 3H), 3.54 (s, 3H), 3.36 (t, 2H, J=6.9 Hz), 3.14 (m, 1H), 2.76 (m, 2H), 2.35-2.18 (m, 6H), 2.00-1.60 (m, 7H), 1.22 (d, 3H, J=7.2 Hz), 1.16-1.12 (m, 12H), 1.07 (d, 3H, J=7.2 Hz); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) 157.3, 133.7, 133.5, 132.2, 132.0, 130.0, 128.7, 118.0, 109.6, 103.0, 96.5, 82.1, 79.7, 79.1, 72.7, 55.8, 39.9, 39.5, 38.3, 35.5, 35.0, 34.8, 34.6, 30.2, 29.8, 24.3, 18.1, 17.7, 15.7, 15.4, 14.2, 13.2, 8.1; LRMS (ESI) 632.4 (M+Na); HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₃₃H₅₅NO₈Na 632.4138, found 632.4139; [Î±]²⁰_D+21.6 (c 0.25, CHCl₃).

(12S,13S,14S,19R,20R,21R,22S)-21-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-13,19-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-12,14,20,22-tetramethylhexacosa-10,15,23,25-tetraen-1-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyl)-ol (45). NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 0.45 mL, 0.45 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of the salt 21 (322 mg, 1.1 mmol) in dry THF (0.3 mL) at 0Â° C. The resulting red solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 44 (120 mg, 0.42 mmol) in THF (0.1 mLÃ—2) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (5 mL) and extracted with ethyl ether (3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and the residue was column chromatographed (hexane/ether 9:1) to yield 163 mg (75%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2928, 2854, 1617, 1517, 1462, 1390, 1249, 1114, 1035, 833, 726 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.44-7.38 (m, 2H), 6.90-6.85 (m, 2H), 5.42 (s, 1H), 5.39 (ddd, J=11.7, 10.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.24 (apparent t, J=10.2 Hz, 1H), 4.08-4.00 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.61 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.54 (dd, J=10.5, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (dd, J=16.1, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (apparent d, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.71-1.68 (m, 1H), 1.54-1.50 (m, 3H), 1.27 (br, 1H), 1.20 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.06 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 160.0, 133.3, 132.6, 132.5, 132.1, 130.7, 128.9, 128.7, 127.6, 113.7, 101.8, 83.9, 74.2, 63.6, 55.5, 33.9, 33.3, 30.4, 30.1, 30.0, 29.9, 29.8, 29.7, 28.0, 26.3, 26.2, 18.7, 16.3, 11.5, âˆ’4.9; LRMS (API-ES) 541(M+Na)⁺, 493, 431, 365, 295, 251; [Î±]²⁰_D+26.0 (c 0.90, CHCl₃).

To a solution of 164 mg (0.325 mmol) of the above acetal in dry CH₂Cl₂(2.0 mL) DIBAL (1.0 M in hexane, 0.95 mL, 0.96 mmol) at 0Â° C. was added dropwise. After 2 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated sodium potassium tartrate solution (20 mL) followed by vigorously stirring for 4 h. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, flash column chromatography (hexane/ether 9:1) provided 115 mg (70%) of alcohol as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3430, 2928, 2855, 1613, 1514, 1463, 1249, 1098, 1038, 835, 776 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.28-7.25 (m, 2H), 6.88-6.85 (m, 2H), 4.59 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 11H), 4.47 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 11H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.65-3.50 (m, 4H), 3.36 (dd, J=5.9, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 2.86-2.78 (m, 11H), 2.11-2.01 (m, 2H), 1.98-1.95 (m, 1H), 1.77 (br, 1H), 1.50 (br, 3H), 1.27 (br, 1H), 0.97 (apparent t, J=7.1 Hz, 6H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.05 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.2, 132.8, 131.1, 130.0, 129.5, 113.8, 84.5, 73.7, 66.4, 63.5, 55.3, 37.6, 34.6, 33.0, 29.8, 29.7, 29.64, 29.61, 29.5, 27.7, 26.1, 25.9, 18.8, 18.4, 11.7, âˆ’5.1; LRMS (EI) 541 (M+Na)⁺, 462, 375, 325, 255, 207, 122; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₇H₄₇O₄Si₁463.3254 (Mâˆ’^tBu)⁺, found 463.3254; [Î±]²⁰_D+25.9 (c 0.48, CHCl₃).

The above alcohol (94 mg, 0.18 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(2 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (120 mg, 0.27 mmol). After 2 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(20 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (10 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided 78 mg (83%) of the crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 0.15 mL, 0.15 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of the salt 33 (140 mg, 0.17 mmol) in dry THF (0.15 mL) at 0Â° C. The resulting red solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde above (69 mg, 0.13 mmol) in THF (0.05 mLÃ—2) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h at room temperature, the mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (2 mL) and extracted with ethyl ether (3Ã—5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and the residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ether 9:1) to yield 45 (111 mg, 65% for 2 steps) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2926, 1612, 1513, 1462, 1361, 1250, 1173, 1098, 836, 774 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.40-7.33 (m, 4H), 6.99-6.93 (m, 4H), 6.49 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.8, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (d, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.51 (d, J=9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.44-5.31 (m, 3H), 5.23 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.13 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.68-4.57 (m, 3H), 4.42 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (s, 6H), 3.69 (t, J=6.5 Hz, 2H), 3.37-3.36 (m, 1H), 3.14 (q, J=3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82-2.71 (m, 2H), 2.08-2.00 (m, 4H), 1.78-1.77 (m, 2H), 1.71-1.58 (m, 6H), 1.36 (br, 11H), 1.11 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 6H), 1.04-1.00 (m, 24H), 0.15 (s, 12H); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.3, 159.1, 134.8, 133.8, 132.5, 132.0, 131.5, 131.1, 129.9, 129.7, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 117.3, 113.8, 113.7, 88.1, 79.1, 74.8, 71.0, 63.4, 55.4, 40.1, 36.6, 35.8, 35.3, 33.0, 31.5, 30.0, 29.8, 29.7, 29.6, 27.7, 26.4, 26.1, 23.8, 19.0, 18.9, 18.5, 17.6, 11.1, âˆ’3.2, âˆ’3.3, âˆ’5.1; LRMS (EI) 890(Mâˆ’^tBu)⁺, 866; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₅₄H₈₉O₆Si₂865.5258(Mâˆ’^tBu)⁺, found 865.5225; [Î±]²⁰_D+20.5 (c 0.60, CHCl₃).

(12S,13S,14S,19R,20R,21R,22S)-21-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-13,19-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-12,14,20,22-tetramethylhexacosa-10,15,23,25-tetraenoic acid (46). To a solution of TBS ether 45 (93 mg, 0.098 mmol) in THF (2 ml) was slowly added HF-pyridine in pyridine (4 ml, prepared by slow addition of 1.2 ml pyridine to 0.3 ml HF-pyridine complex followed by dilution with 3 ml THF). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and quenched with sat'd NaHCO₃(20 ml). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 ml). The combined organic layer was washed with sat'd CuSO₄(3Ã—20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, and concentrated. Flash column chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:4) afforded 64 mg (78%) of the alcohol: IR (CHCl₃) 3429, 2928, 2855, 1694, 1612, 1513, 1462, 1250, 1173, 1038, 836, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.40-7.33 (m, 4H), 6.99-6.95 (m, 4H), 6.49 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.6, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.52 (d, J=9.7 Hz, 1H), 5.46-5.34 (m, 2H), 5.23 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.68-4.57 (m, 3H), 4.45-4.41 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.72-3.67 (m, 2H), 3.37-3.36 (m, 2H), 3.14 (q, J=3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80-2.70 (m, 2H), 2.08-1.99 (m,4H), 1.78-1.77 (m, 2H), 1.71-1.58 (m, 6H), 1.36 (br, 11H), 1.10 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 6H), 1.02 (d, J=2.6 Hz, 6H), 1.00 (s, 9H), 0.15 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.3, 159.1, 134.8, 134.8, 133.8, 132.5, 132.1, 131.5, 131.1, 129.9, 129.7, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 117.3, 113.8, 113.7, 88.1, 79.0, 76.7, 74.8, 71.0, 63.1, 55.4, 40.1, 36.6, 35.8, 35.4, 32.9, 31.4, 30.0, 29.7, 29.63, 29.56, 27.6, 26.4, 25.9, 23.8, 19.0, 18.9, 18.6, 17.6, 11.1, âˆ’3.2, âˆ’3.3; LRMS (API-ES) 871 (M+K)⁺, 445, 364, 338; [Î±]²⁰_D+27.0 (c 0.24, CHCl₃).

The above alcohol (0.213 g, 0.26 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (160 mg, 0.38 mmol). After 2 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (10 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 8:2) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided the aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. A solution of the above aldehyde in 1 ml of THF and 0.5 ml of H₂O was treated with 0.74 ml (1.48 mmol) of a 2M solution of 2-methyl-2-butene in THF, 0.11 g (0.77 mmol) of NaH₂PO₄â€”H₂O and 0.087 g (0.77 mmol) of NaClO₂. The reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h, diluted with 20 ml of 1N HCl and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—20 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄, concentrated in vacuo and the residue was chromatographed on SiO₂(EtOAc/hexane 1:3) to yield 192 mg (89% for 2 steps) of the acid 46 as a viscous oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3398, 2929, 2855, 1710, 1612, 1513, 1249, 1040 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.46-7.40 (m, 4H), 7.05-6.99 (m, 4H), 6.55 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.6, 10.3 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.52-5.37 (m, 3H), 5.30 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (d, J=10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.74-4.64 (m, 3H), 4.52-4.48 (m, 1H), 3.95 (s, 6H), 3.72 (dd, J=6.2, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (dd, J=10.5, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 3.21 (q, J=3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.87-2.77 (m, 3H), 2.49 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.15-2.09 (m, 4H), 1.87-1.70 (m, 5H), 1.43 (br, 11H), 1.17 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 6H), 1.10 (d, J=3.0 Hz, 6H), 1.07 (s, 9H), 0.22 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 180.06 159.3, 159.1, 134.8, 133.8, 132.5, 132.1, 131.5, 131.1, 129.8, 129.7, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 117.3, 113.8, 113.7, 88.1, 79.0, 76.7, 74.8, 70.9, 55.4, 40.1, 36.6, 35.8, 35.4, 34.2, 31.4, 29.9, 29.5, 29.3, 29.2, 27.6, 26.4, 24.8, 23.8, 19.0, 18.9, 18.6, 17.6, 11.1, âˆ’3.2, âˆ’3.3; LRMS (API-ES) 846 (M)^âˆ’, 845 (Mâˆ’H)^âˆ’; [Î±]²⁰_D+24.5 (c 0.38, CHCl₃).

(1S,13S,14S,15S,20R,21R,22R)-14,20-Dihydroxy-13,15,21-trimethyl-22-(1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl)-oxacyclodocosa-11,16-dien-2-one (43). To 46 (146 mg, 0.17 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added TBAF (1.0 M in THF, 1.72 mL, 1.72 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl ether (30 mL) and was washed with water (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, the crude was chromatographed on SiO₂(EtOAc/hexane 1:4) to yield 72 mg (57%) of the acid as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3467, 2927, 2854, 1710, 1612, 1513, 1460, 1248, 1174, 1036 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.39-7.32 (m, 4H), 6.98-6.93 (m, 4H), 6.69 (ddd, J=16.7, 10.7, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (apparent t, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.46-5.37 (m, 3H), 5.30 (d, J=17.2 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.69-4.58 (m, 3H), 4.47-4.44 (m, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.58-3.56 (m, 2H), 3.16 (q, J=3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.86-2.79 (m, 2H), 2.73-2.70 (m, 1H), 2.42 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.14-2.02 (m, 4H), 1.91-1.89 (m, 1H), 1.81-1.71 (m, 4H), 1.37 (br, 11H), 1.12 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 6H), 1.07 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 179.6 159.3, 159.1, 135.6, 134.1, 132.4, 132.0, 131.4, 130.4, 130.1, 129.9, 129.6, 129.3, 128.3, 117.9, 113.9, 113.8, 88.1, 83.0, 78.2, 74.9, 71.0, 55.4, 36.7, 36.2, 36.1, 35.4, 34.1, 30.6, 29.9, 29.8, 29.5, 29.3, 29.2, 27.6, 24.8, 23.7, 19.0, 17.7, 17.5, 6.9; LRMS (API-ES) 755.5 (M+Na)⁺, 866; [Î±]²⁰_D+31.3 (c 0.64, CHCl₃).

A solution of above hydroxy acid (60 mg, 0.081 mmol) in THF (1 ml) was treated at 0Â° C. with Et₃N (0.068 ml, 0.49 mmol) and 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride (0.064 ml, 0.41 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0Â° C. for 30 min and then added to a 4-DMAP (41 ml, 0.81 mmol, 0.02 M solution in toluene) at 25Â° C. and stirred for overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated, EtOAc (10 mL) was added and the crude was washed with 1N HCl (2Ã—10 ml), dried over MgSO₄. Purification by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:9) furnished macrolactone (33 mg, 57%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2926, 2855, 1730, 1612, 1513, 1459, 1248, 1174, 1109 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.41-7.35 (m, 4H), 6.98-6.94 (m, 4H), 6.55 (ddd, J=16.5, 10.9, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (apparent t, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (apparent t, J=10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.48-5.29 (m, 4H), 5.24 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J=10.3 Hz, 11H), 5.01 (dd, J=7.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.66-4.53 (m, 3H), 4.43 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.20-3.18 (m, 1H), 3.13 (d, J=9.6 Hz, 11H), 2.97-2.89 (m, 1H), 2.76-2.64 (m, 2H), 2.37-2.19 (m, 3H), 2.04-1.98 (m, 4H), 1.78-1.57 (m, 4H), 1.38 (br, 11H), 1.16-1.10 (m, 9H), 0.99 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 173.4 159.6, 159.3, 134.4, 133.7, 132.5, 131.8, 131.4, 131.0, 130.2, 130.0, 129.9, 129.4, 129.3, 118.0, 114.2, 114.0, 89.0, 80.6, 76.6, 75.7, 72.0, 55.6, 38.3, 37.5, 36.1, 34.9, 34.7, 31.7, 30.0, 29.6, 29.0, 28.8, 28.7, 27.2, 25.1, 24.5, 20.0, 18.8, 17.4, 10.4; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₄₆H₆₆O₆714.4859, found 714.4848; [Î±]²⁰_D+5.8 (c 0.39, CHCl₃).

The above macrolactone (12 mg, 16. Î¼mol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(2 ml)â€”H₂O (0.2 ml) and DDQ (12 mg, 53 Î¼mol) was added at 0Â° C. After 1 h of stirring at 0Â° C., the reaction mixture was quenched by adding sat'd NaHCO₃(5 ml). The organic phase was washed by sat'd NaHCO₃solution (3Ã—20 ml) and brine, dried over MgSO₄and concentrated. Purification by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:4) furnished macrolactone (6.8 mg, 85%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3434, 2926, 2854, 2359, 2341, 1731, 1651, 1505, 1456, 1377, 1261, 1107, 965, 905, 803 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 6.75 (dt, J=16.8, 10.9 Hz, 1H), 6.13 (t, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.60-5.56(m, 1H), 5.54-5.46 (m, 2H), 5.42-5.30 (m, 3H), 5.25 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (dd, J=8.9; 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (ddd, J=9.5, 7.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (dd, J=7.3, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.18-3.05 (m, 1H), 2.86-2.74 (m, 2H), 2.43-2.30 (m, 3H), 2.23-2.05 (m, 2H), 1.84 (br, 9H), 1.42 (br, 9H), 1.23 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.17 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.11 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 173.4, 134.6, 132.4, 131.9, 130.5, 129.9, 129.8, 129.1, 117.9, 80.1, 76.4, 72.9, 40.0, 36.9, 35.4, 34.8, 34.6, 34.5, 29.0, 28.6, 28.4, 28.3, 28.1, 26.9, 24.8, 24.2, 18.9, 18.8, 17.1, 9.6; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₃₀H₄₉O₃456.3603 (Mâˆ’OH)⁺, found 456.3622; [Î±]²⁰_D+29.0 (c 0.10, CHCl₃).

(12S,13S,14S,19R,20R,21R,22S)-12,14,20,22-Tetramethylhexacosa-10,15,23,25-tetraene-1,13,19,21-tetraol (47). The protected alcohol 45 (54 mg, 57 Î¼mol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(3 ml)-H₂O (0.3 ml) and DDQ (39 mg, 0.17 mmol) was added at 0Â° C. After 1 h of stirring at 0Â° C., the reaction mixture was quenched by adding sat'd NaHCO₃(10 ml). The organic phase was washed by sat'd NaHCO₃solution (3Ã—20 ml) and brine, dried over MgSO₄and concentrated. Purification by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:9) furnished the diol (20 mg, 53%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3434, 2958, 2924, 2853, 2362, 1463, 1382, 1246, 1095, 1021, 832, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 6.58 (ddd, J=16.7, 10.7, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 11H), 5.62 (t, J=10.3 Hz, 1H), 5.55-5.45 (m, 1H), 5.41-5.27 (m, 3H), 5.21 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J=10.2 Hz, 11H), 3.74-3.72 (m, 1H), 3.65-3.63 (m, 1H), 3.60 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.20 (dd, J=6.1, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 2.96-2.91 (m, 1H), 2.69-2.56 (m, 2H), 2.17-1.95 (m, 4H), 1.60-1.51 (m, 8H), 1.27 (br, 11H), 1.03 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (s, 11H), 0.90 (s, 10H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H), 0.06 (s, 6H); LRMS (API-ES) 729.5 (M+Na)⁺, 557.5, 413, 243; [Î±]²_D+48.0 (c 0.025, CHCl₃).

To an above solution (20 mg, 28 Î¼mol) in THF (1 mL) was added TBAF (1.0 M in THF, 0.28 mL, 0.28 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and was washed with water (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, the crude was chromatographed on SiO₂(EtOAc/hexane 1:3) to yield 11 mg (83%) of the alcohol 47 as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3378, 2925, 2853, 2359, 1651, 1455, 1377, 1056, 971, 903 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] {tilde over (â–¡)}â–¡ ddd, J=16.8, 10.6, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.54-5.46 (m, 1H), 5.43-5.36 (m, 2H), 5.31-5.18 (m, 4H), 3.84 (dd, J=7.3, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (apparent t, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.46 (d, J=9.3 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.86-2.78 (m, 1H), 2.72-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.23-2.02 (m, 4H), 1.71-1.53 (m, 8H), 1.29-1.26 (m, 13H), 1.01-0.91 (m, 12H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 134.5, 133.8, 132.2, 132.1, 131.9, 131.3, 128.9, 119.1, 80.6, 79.1, 76.1, 63.2, 53.6, 37.6, 36.4, 35.5, 35.1, 34.5, 32.9, 29.8, 29.6, 29.5, 29.4, 27.7, 25.8, 24.2, 18.1, 16.7, 15.3, 4.5; LRMS (API-ES) 517 (M+K)⁺, 501 (M+Na)⁺, 479 (M+H)⁺, 461 (M+Hâˆ’H₂O)⁺, 443; [Î±]²⁰_D+43.3 (c 0.18, CHCl₃).

(12S,13S,14S,19R,20R,21R,22S)-13,19,21-Trihydroxy-12,14,20,22-tetramethylhexacosa-10,15,23,25-tetraenoic acid methyl ester (48). To an acid 46 (34 mg, 40 Î¼mol) in DMF (3 ml) K₂CO₃(0.017 g, 0.12 mmol) and MeI (0.009 ml, 0.06 mmol) were added and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched by H₂O (1 ml) and extracted with EtOAc (3Ã—5 ml) and washed with brine (5 ml). The organic phase was dried over MgSO₄and evaporated and the residue was used as crude without no further purification (36 mg, 85%): IR (CHCl₃) 2928, 2855, 1740, 1613, 1513, 1462, 1301, 1248, 1172, 1038, 836, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.30-7.24 (m, 4H), 6.90-6.86 (m, 4H), 6.39 (ddd, J=16.9, 10.7, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.50 (d, J=10.3 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (d, J=10.7 Hz, 1H), 5.36-5.21 (m, 3H), 5.14 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d, J=9.9 Hz, 1H), 4.59-4.47 (m, 3H), 4.39-4.31 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.57 (dd, J=5.9, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 3.28-3.26 (m, 1H), 3.05 (q, J=3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.71-2.61 (m, 3H), 2.30 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.99-1.90 (m, 4H), 1.68-1.59 (m, 5H), 1.26 (br, 11H), 1.01 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.91 (br, 15H), 0.05 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 177.4, 159.3, 159.1, 134.8, 133.8, 132.5, 132.1, 131.5, 131.1, 129.8, 129.7, 129.2, 129.1, 128.6, 117.3, 113.8, 113.7, 88.1, 79.0, 55.4, 51.6, 40.0, 36.5, 35.8, 35.4, 34.2, 31.4, 29.9, 29.8, 29.5, 29.4, 29.3, 27.6, 26.4, 25.1, 23.7, 19.0, 18.6, 17.6, 11.1, âˆ’3.2, âˆ’3.3; LRMS (API-ES) 883.6 (M+Na)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+24.7 (c 1.6, CHCl₃).

The above ester (41 mg, 47 Î¼mol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(2 ml)â€”H₂O (0.4 ml) and DDQ (32 mg, 0.14 mmol) was added at 0Â° C. and was followed same procedure for 43. Purification by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:8) furnished the diol (25 mg, 84%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3487, 2924, 2850, 1741, 1602, 1463, 1367, 1249, 838, 761 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 6.59 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.8, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.62 (t, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 5.54-5.46 (m, 1H), 5.41-5.30 (m, 3H), 5.23 (d, J=17.9 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J=10.2 Hz, 1H), 3.75-3.71 (m, 1H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.65-3.63 (m, 1H), 3.20 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.96-2.90 (m, 1H), 2.69-2.58 (m, 2H), 2.31 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.17-1.95 (m, 5H), 1.62-1.52 (m, 5H), 1.29 (br, 11H), 1.03 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (s, 12H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 174.3, 134.4, 133.7, 132.0, 131.4, 129.4, 128.8, 118.1, 114.3, 79.0, 78.7, 71.2, 51.4, 42.5, 35.8, 35.7, 35.5, 34.4, 34.1, 29.7, 29.3, 29.2, 29.1, 27.6, 26.1, 24.9, 24.3, 19.2, 18.3, 17.9, 15.0, 14.1, 9.5, âˆ’3.7, âˆ’3.9; LRMS (API-ES) 643.5 (M+Na)⁺, 471.4; [Î±]²⁰_D+41.6 (c 0.74, CHCl₃).

To an above solution (25 mg, 40 Î¼mol) in THF (2 mL) was added TBAF (1.0 M in THF, 0.12 mL, 0.12 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and was washed with water (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, the crude was chromatographed on SiO₂(EtOAc/hexane 1:3) to yield 8.5 mg (93%) of the ester 48 as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3444, 2952, 2925, 2847, 1734, 1451, 1379, 1237, 1197, 1451, 967 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] {tilde over (â–¡)}â–¡ ddd, J=16.8, 10.7, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (apparent t, J=10.7 Hz, 1H), 5.54-5.46 (m, 1H), 5.43-5.36 (m, 2H), 5.31-5.18 (m, 4H), 3.83 (dd, J=9.0, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.46 (dd, J=9.3, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (apparent t, J=5.4 Hz, 1H), 2.85-2.78 (m, 1H), 2.72-2.59 (m, 2H), 2.31 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 3H), 2.20-1.95 (m, 3H), 1.74-1.59 (m, 6H), 1.29 (br, 12H), 1.01-0.93 (m, 12H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 174.3, 134.4, 133.7, 131.9, 131.3, 128.7, 118.9, 80.5, 79.1, 76.0, 51.4, 37.7, 36.4, 35.5, 35.1, 34.5, 34.1, 30.0, 29.3, 29.2, 29.1, 27.6, 24.9, 24.2, 22.7, 17.9, 16.7, 15.1, 4.5; LRMS (API-ES) 529 (M+Na)⁺, 507, 489, 471, 453; [Î±]²⁰_D+27.3 (c 0.43, CHCl₃).

(12S,13S,14S,19R,20R,21R,22S)-13,19,21-Trihydroxy-12,14,20,22-tetramethylhexacosa-10,15,23,25-tetraenoic acid (49). To an above solution 48 (8.0 mg) in THFâ€”H₂O (0.3 ml, 0.1 ml each) was added LiOHH₂O (1.3 mg) and the solution was warmed to 60Â° C. After stirring 6 h, 1N HCl (1 ml) was added and reaction mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(10 mlÃ—2). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, the crude was chromatographed on SiO₂(EtOAc/hexane 1:3) to yield 6.3 mg (81%) of the 49 as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3412, 2964, 2921, 2850, 2658, 1710, 1459, 1404, 1268, 971, 903 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 6.64 (ddd, J=16.7, 10.6, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 6.20 (apparent t, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.54-5.46 (m, 1H), 5.42-5.36 (m, 2H), 5.32-5.18 (m, 4H), 3.88-3.84 (m, 1H), 3.48 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (apparent t, J=5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.86-2.76 (m, 1H), 2.69-2.60 (m, 2H), 2.34 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.21-2.04 (m, 5H), 1.70-1.62 (m, 5H), 1.28 (br, 13H), 1.00 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 180.6, 134.4, 133.8, 132.1, 132.0, 132.0, 131.3, 128.8, 119.1, 80.7, 79.2, 76.2, 37.6, 35.5, 34.6, 29.8, 29.7, 29.5, 29.2, 29.1, 29.0, 27.6, 24.8, 24.2, 22.8, 18.1, 16.7, 15.4, 14.2, 4.5; LRMS (API-ES) 515.3 (M+Na)⁺, 493 (M+H)⁺, 475 (M+Hâ€”H₂O)⁺, 457 (M+Hâˆ’H₂O)⁺, 242; [Î±]²⁰_D+33.0 (c 0.23, CHCl₃).

(4R,5R)-5-(4-Methoxybenzyloxy)-4-methyl-8-oxooct-2-enoic acid ethyl ester (51). To a cooled (0Â° C.) stirred suspension of NaH (2.27 g, 11.3 mmol, 60% dispersion in mineral oil) in THF (130 ml) was added dropwise a solution of triethyl phosphonoacetate (2.27 ml, 11.4 mmol) over 10 min period. The mixture was brought to room temperature with a water bath (30 min) and then cooled back to 0Â° C. and the aldehyde from 50 (3.43 g, 9.0 mmol) in THF (10 ml) was added. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0Â° C. then pH7 phosphate buffer solution (30 ml) and diethyl ether (100 ml) were added. The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and the phase was separated. The organic phase was washed with sat'd NH₄Cl solution (30 ml) and brine (30 ml), dried with MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated to give oily crude product. Purification by flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:4) afforded pure ester (3.82 g, 94%): IR (CHCl₃) 2954, 2928, 2855, 1720, 1513, 1250, 1034, 835 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] {tilde over (â–¡)}â–¡9-7.25 m, 2H), 7.00 (dd, J=15.7, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.91-6.84 (m, 2H), 5.83 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (dd, J=14.6, 11.1 Hz, 2H), 4.19 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.64-3.52 (m, 2H), 3.37-3.33 (m, 1H), 2.64 (dd, J=13.2, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 1.42-1.68 (m, 4H), 1.30 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.09 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.04 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.7, 159.3, 151.2, 130.8, 130.4, 129.5, 121.3, 113.9, 81.8, 71.6, 63.1, 60.3, 55.3, 39.8, 28.9, 27.7, 26.1, 18.5, 15.1, 14.4, âˆ’5.1; LRMS(API-ES) 489.1 (M+K)⁺, 435, 263, 204; [Î±]²⁰_D+6.4 (c 0.43, CHCl₃).

To a solution of above TBS ether (0.324 g, 0.72 mmol) in THF (5 ml) was slowly added HF-pyridine in pyridine (8 ml, prepared by slow addition of 2.4 ml pyridine to 0.6 ml HF-pyridine complex followed by dilution with 5 ml THF). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and quenched with sat'd NaHCO₃(20 ml). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 ml). The combined organic layer was washed with sat'd CuSO₄(3Ã—20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, and concentrated. Flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:3) afforded 0.203 g (84%) of the alcohol: IR (CHCl₃) 1715, 1612, 1514, 1249, 1180, 1035 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] {tilde over (â–¡)}â–¡7-7.24 m, 2H), 6.98 (dd, J=15.8, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.88-6.85 (m, 2H), 5.83 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (dd, J=14.6, 11.1 Hz, 2H), 4.17 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.59-3.56 (m, 2H), 3.37-3.33 (m, 1H), 2.71-2.65 (m, 1H), 2.15 (br, 1H), 1.77-1.40 (m, 4H), 1.28 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.08 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.7, 159.3, 150.8, 130.4, 129.6, 121.4, 113.9, 81.9, 71.7, 62.8, 60.4, 55.3, 39.5, 28.9, 27.8, 15.2, 14.4; LRMS(API-ES) 375.1 (M+K)⁺, 359.1 (M+Na)⁺, 241, 225; [Î±]²⁰_D+12.0 (c 0.15, CHCl₃).

The above alcohol (0.203 g, 0.61 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(6 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (0.38 g, 0.90 mmol). After 2 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (10 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 3:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided 0.146 g (72%) of the crude aldehyde 51 as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.68 (s, 1H), 7.27-7.21 (m, 2H), 6.99 (dd, J=15.8, 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.88-6.85 (m, 2H), 5.84 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.41-3.31 (m, 1H), 2.73-2.63 (m, 1H), 2.55-2.40 (m, 1H), 1.90-1.78 (m, 1H), 1.71-1.61 (m, 1H), 1.28 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.27-1.22 (m, 2H), 1.10 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H).

(4R,5R,10S,11S,12S,17R,18R,19R,20S)-19-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-5,11,17-tris-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-4,10,12,18,20-pentamethyltetracosa-2,8,13,21,23-pentaenoic acid ethyl ester (52). NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 0.49 mL, 0.49 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of the salt 21 (0.35 g, 0.55 mmol) in dry THF (0.50 mL) at 0Â° C. The resulting red solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 51 (146 mg, 0.44 mmol) in THF (0.1 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h at room temperature, the mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (2 mL) and extracted with ethyl ether (3Ã—10 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and the residue was flash column chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to yield (183 mg, 74%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2962, 2850, 1716, 1614, 1515, 1249, 1179, 1035 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] {tilde over (â–¡)}â–¡6-7.49 m, 2H), 7.41-7.36 (m, 2H), 7.12 (dd, J=15.8, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00-6.97 (m, 4H), 5.95 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (s, 1H), 5.52-5.39 (m, 2H), 4.53 (d, J=3.0 Hz, 2H), 4.33 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.22-4.14 (m, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 3.69 (dd, J=9.6, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 3.46-3.40 (m, 1H), 2.88-2.80 (m, 1H), 2.75-2.67 (m, 1H), 2.36-2.14 (m, 2H), 1.84-1.81 (m, 1H), 1.67-1.55 (m, 2H), 1.43 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.8, 159.8, 159.3, 151.3, 134.0, 131.8, 130.9, 129.7, 129.5, 127.4, 121.1, 113.9, 113.5, 101.7, 83.9, 81.5, 74.0, 71.7, 60.3, 55.4, 39.7, 33.8, 31.5, 30.1, 23.9, 16.1, 15.0, 14.4, 11.2; LRMS (API-ES) 605.3 (M+K)⁺, 589.3 (M+Na)⁺, 567.3 (M+H)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+30.0 (c 0.01, CHCl₃).

Trimethylsilyl chloride (0.24 ml, 1.9 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred mixture containing above acetal (0.177 g, 0.31 mmol), NaCNBH₃(0.12 g, 1.9 mmol) and 4 â„« molecular sieve in acetonitrile (6 ml) at 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0Â° C. and filtered through Celite, poured into 1N HCl (10 ml). The aqueous phase was extracted by CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—20 ml), dried (MgSO₄), filtered and concentrated. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc/hexane 1:3) to yield the alcohol (0.121 g, 68%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3467, 2962, 2931, 2873, 1716, 1612, 1514, 1462, 1248, 1179, 1035 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.26-7.24 (m, 4H), 6.98 (dd, J=15.7, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.91-6.85 (m, 4H), 5.83 (d, J=15.7 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (dd, J=10.8, 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.41-5.33 (m, 1H), 4.58 (d, J=12.7 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (d, J=11.9 Hz, 3H), 4.19 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.63-3.49 (m, 2H), 3.39-3.29 (m, 2H), 2.78 (dd, J=15.7, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.61 (dd, J=13.1, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.23-2.17 (m, 1H), 2.09-1.94 (m, 3H), 1.58-1.44 (m, 2H), 1.29 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.06 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.8, 159.2, 151.1, 133.6, 131.1, 130.7, 129.5, 129.1, 128.7, 121.3, 114.0, 113.9, 113.8, 84.3, 81.6, 73.9, 71.6, 66.2, 60.4, 55.4, 39.7, 37.7, 34.8, 31.5, 23.8, 18.7, 15.1, 14.4, 11.5; LRMS (API-ES) 591.2 (M+Na)⁺, 569.3 (M+H)⁺, 551; [Î±]²⁰_D+37.2 (c 0.39, CHCl₃).

The same procedure for 45 was used with above alcohol (0.088 g, 0.16 mmol) to yield 64 mg (42% for 2 steps) of the 52 by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:5): IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2932, 2857, 1717, 1612, 1513, 1462, 1301, 1248, 1172, 1037, 835, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.29-7.23 (m, 6H), 6.98 (dd, J=15.9, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.89-6.85 (m, 6H), 6.40 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.6, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (apparent t, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (apparent q, J=10.6 Hz, 11H), 5.36-5.24 (m, 4H), 5.15 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J=9.9 Hz, 1H), 4.58-4.32 (m, 6H), 4.20 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 6H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.58-3.57 (m, 1H), 3.30-3.28 (m, 2H), 3.06-3.04 (m, 1H), 2.71-2.65 (m, 2H), 2.62-2.56 (m, 2H), 2.19-2.17 (m, 2H), 2.06-1.88 (m, 4H), 1.76-1.42 (m, 6H), 1.30 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.07-0.97 (m, 12H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.06 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.7, 159.2, 159.1, 151.2, 134.8, 133.8, 132.9, 132.5, 131.4, 130.7, 129.5, 129.2, 128.9, 128.6, 121.2, 117.3, 113.8, 113.7, 88.0, 81.6, 78.9, 74.9, 71.6, 70.9, 60.3, 55.4, 40.0, 39.7, 36.5, 35.5, 35.4, 31.6, 31.4, 26.3, 23.7, 20.8, 19.0, 18.8, 18.6, 17.2, 15.0, 14.4, 11.1, âˆ’3.2; LRMS (API-ES) 1034.2 (M+K)⁺, 1017.6 (M+Na)⁺, 995.7 (M+H)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+40.7 (c 4.09, CHCl₃).

(6R,7R,12S,13S,14S,19R,20R,21R,22S)-21-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-7,13,19-tris-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-6,12,14,20,22-pentamethylhexacosa-2,4,10,15,23,25-hexaenoic acid methyl ester (53). To the above ester 52 (64 mg. 64 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(2 ml) was added DIBAL-H (0.16 ml, 0.16 mmol, 1.0 M solution in hexane) at âˆ’78Â° C. dropwise and then warmed up to 0Â° C. and stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by EtOAc (2 ml) and sat'd sodium potassium tartrate solution (20 mL) followed by vigorously stirring for 4 h. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—10 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 3:1) provided 47 mg of alcohol (77%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3429, 2956, 2857, 2360, 1613, 1513, 1463, 1248, 1037, 835 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.43-7.37 (m, 6H), 7.03-6.98 (m, 6H), 6.53 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.6, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.81-5.77 (m, 2H), 5.64 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.72-4.45 (m, 6H), 4.21 (q, J=3.2 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (s, 6H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.71 (dd, J=5.6, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (dd, J=10.5, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (dd, J=11.1, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J=12.1, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.36-2.19 (m, 2H), 2.12-2.02 (m, 3H), 1.87-1.59 (m, 5H), 1.16-1.13 (m, 9H), 1.07-1.05 (m, 6H), 1.04 (s, 9H), 0.19 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.3, 159.2, 159.1, 135.1, 134.8, 133.9, 132.7, 132.6, 131.5, 131.1, 129.7, 129.5, 129.3, 129.2, 128.8, 128.6, 117.4, 114.1, 113.8, 88.1, 82.5, 79.0, 74.9, 71.5, 70.9, 65.2, 64.0, 55.4, 40.0, 39.4, 36.6, 35.6, 35.4, 31.4, 29.9, 26.4, 23.9, 23.7, 19.1, 18.8, 18.7, 17.3, 16.1, 11.1, âˆ’3.1, âˆ’3.2; LRMS (API-ES) 991.6 (M+K)⁺, 975.6 (M+Na)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+38.3 (c 1.05, CHCl₃).

The above alcohol (47 mg, 49 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(2 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (31 mg, 73 Î¼mol). After 2 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(5 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (5 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 3:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. To a stirred solution of bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)-(methoxycarbonylmethyl) phosphate (0.013 ml, 59 Î¼mol), 18-crown-6 (0.065 g, 0.25 mmol) in THF (1 ml) cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. was added dropwise potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (0.12 ml, 59 Î¼mol, 0.5M solution in toluene). Thereafter the above aldehyde in THF (1 ml) was added and the solution was stirred for 6 h at âˆ’78Â° C. The reaction mixture was quenched by addition of a sat'd NH₄Cl solution (1 ml) and diluted with diethyl ether (10 ml). The layer was separated and organic phase was washed with brine (10 ml) and dried with MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:5), yielding 40 mg of (E,Z)-doubly unsaturated ester 53 (85% for 2 steps): IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2856, 1717, 1612, 1513, 1462, 1301, 1248, 1173, 1037, 820 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.53 (dd, J=15.4, 11.3 Hz, 1H), 7.43-7.37 (m, 6H), 7.03-6.98 (m, 6H), 6.68 (dd, J=11.4, 11.3 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (ddd, J=17.0, 10.7, 10.4 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (dd, J=15.4, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.09 (apparent t, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (d, J=11.4 Hz, 1H), 5.64 (d, J=10.3 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.45-5.41 (m, 3H), 5.28 (d, J=15.3 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (d, J=10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.71-4.45 (m, 6H), 3.94 (s, 6H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.70 (dd, J=6.1, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.44-3.38 (m, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J=6.9, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.85-2.77 (m, 3H), 2.34-2.31 (m, 2H), 2.08-2.04 (m, 3H), 1.84-1.55 (m, 5H), 1.20 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.14 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.12 (d, J=8.2 Hz, 3H), 1.07-1.01 (m, 15H), 0.16 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.9, 159.1, 158.9, 147.6, 145.6, 134.7, 133.7, 132.7, 132.4, 131.3, 130.9, 130.8, 129.5, 129.4, 129.0, 128.9, 128.4, 126.4, 117.2, 115.4, 113.7, 87.9, 82.1, 78.8, 74.7, 71.4, 70.8, 55.2, 53.4, 51.1, 40.0, 36.4, 35.4, 35.2, 31.4, 31.3, 29.7, 26.2, 23.7, 23.6, 18.9, 18.6, 18.5, 17.1, 15.4, 10.9, âˆ’3.3, âˆ’3.4; LRMS (API-ES) 1045.5 (M+K)⁺, 1029.5 (M+Na)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+35.3 (c 0.96, CHCl₃).

(7R,8R,13S,14S,15S,20R,21R,22R,23S)-8,14,20-Trihydroxy-7,13,15,21-tetramethyl-22-(1-methylpenta-2,4-dienyl)-oxacyclodocosa-3,5,11,16-tetraen-2-one (54). To a stirred solution of protected alcohol 53 (33 mg, 33 Î¼mol) in THF (1 ml) at 0Â° C. was added 2 ml of 3 N HCl (prepared by adding 25 ml of conc. HCl to 75 ml MeOH). After 6 h, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (5 ml) and H₂O (5 ml) and the organic phase was separated and aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—5 ml). The combined organic phase was washed with sat'd NaHCO₃(10 ml), dried with MgSO₄, concentrated and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:4) to yield 19 mg (21 Î¼mol) of product (63%): IR (CHCl₃) 3491, 2958, 2869, 1716, 1612, 1513, 1456, 1248, 1036 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.40 (dd, J=15.3, 11.5 Hz, 1H), 7.29-7.22 (m, 6H), 6.92-6.84 (m, 6H), 6.61 (ddd, J=17.7, 10.7, 10.4 Hz, 1H), 6.54 (dd, J=11.5, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 6.10 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (dd, J=15.1, 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 5.49 (d, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 5.37-5.30 (m, 3H), 5.21 (d, J=17.0 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (d, J=10.2 Hz, 1H), 4.58-4.34 (m, 6H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 3.47-3.44 (m, 2H), 3.31-3.25 (m 1H), 3.05 (dd, J=7.3, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.80-2.69 (m, 2H), 2.66-2.61 (m, 1H), 2.20-2.15 (m, 2H), 2.05-1.91 (m, 3H), 1.85-1.76 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.61 (m, 2H), 1.57-1.47 (m, 2H), 1.09 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (apparent q, J=7.1 Hz, 9H), 0.91 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 167.1, 159.3, 159.1, 147.7, 145.7, 136.8, 134.1, 132.8, 132.5, 131.4, 132.8, 132.5, 131.4, 130.9, 130.4, 130.2, 129.6, 129.3, 128.3, 126.6, 118.0, 115.6, 114.0, 113.9, 88.1, 83.1, 82.2, 75.0, 71.5, 71.0, 55.4, 51.2, 40.1, 36.7, 36.3, 35.9, 35.4, 31.6, 30.6, 29.9, 23.9, 23.8, 19.0, 17.6, 15.6; LRMS (API-ES) 915.5 (M+Na)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+41.1 (c 0.45, CHCl₃).

To the stirred solution of above ester (19 mg, 21 Î¼mol) in EtOH (1 ml) was added 1N aqueous KOH solution (0.056 ml) and the mixture was refluxed gently until the ester disappeared (about 6 h) as determined by TLC. The ethanolic solution was concentrated and then diluted with EtOAc (2 ml). After the solution was acidified to pH3 with 1N HCl solution, organic phase was separated and aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—5 ml). The combined organic phase were dried with MgSO₄, concentrated and used as crude without further purification. The same procedure for 43 was used with above acid compound to yield 14 mg (79% for 2 steps) of the macrolactone product by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:3): IR (CHCl₃) 2961, 2869, 1708, 1612, 1513, 1462, 1248, 1174, 1076, 1036, 820, 755 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.41-7.38 (m, 7H), 7.03-6.96 (m, 6H), 6.73-6.57 (m, 1H), 6.67 (apparent t, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (dd, J=15.8, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 5.53-5.40 (m, 3H), 5.34-5.19 (m, 4H), 4.70-4.47 (m, 6H), 3.94 (s, 6H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.43-3.38 (m, 1H), 3.26-3.16 (m 2H), 3.08-3.03 (m, 1H), 2.87-2.86 (m, 1H), 2.78-2.73 (m, 2H), 2.22-2.19 (m, 2H), 2.07-2.05 (m, 3H), 1.93-1.55 (m, 5H), 1.23 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 9H), 1.07 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.3, 159.2, 158.9, 145.4, 143.6, 134.0, 133.0, 132.2, 131.4, 130.8, 130.7, 129.9, 129.53, 128.48, 129.43, 129.4, 129.3, 129.2, 129.0, 126.2, 117.7, 116.9, 113.8, 113.6, 88.0, 83.2, 75.2, 71.7, 71.2, 55.2, 39.4, 38.4, 37.0, 35.6, 34.3, 31.7, 25.4, 24.9, 19.7, 18.6, 17.2, 15.4, 10.0; LRMS (API-ES) 899.5 (M+K)⁺, 883.5 (M+Na)⁺; [Î±]²⁰_D+40.4 (c 0.47, CHCl₃).

The same procedure for 43 was used with above lactone (14 mg, 16 Î¼mol) to yield 3.7 mg (46%) of the product 54 by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:2): IR (CHCl₃) 3411, 2964, 2926, 2872, 1692, 1637, 1435, 1182, 999, 962 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.27 (ddt, J=15.7, 11.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (ddt, J=16.8, 1.1, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (apparent t, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 6.02 (dd, J=15.4, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (apparent t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (d, J=11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (dd, J=10.8, 9.1 Hz, 1H), 5.39-5.36 (m, 1H), 5.33 (apparent t, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 5.30-5.23 (m, 2H), 5.19 (dt, J=16.8, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 5.10 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (dd, J=7.8, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (ddd, J=11.7, 5.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (ddd, J=8.9, 6.0, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 3.31 (dd, J=7.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.06-3.00 (m, 1H), 2.68-2.61 (m, 2H), 2.41 (dd, J=13.7, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.20-2.11 (m, 2H), 1.82 (dt, J=7.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 1.77-1.71 (m, 2H), 1.41-1.35 (m, 2H), 1.32-1.25 (m, 2H), 1.11 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.06 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.5, 145.8, 143.5, 133.8, 132.3, 132.1, 131.5, 130.0, 129.8, 129.7, 127.0, 117.9, 117.2, 79.3, 73.1, 72.7, 42.8, 40.4, 36.7, 35.0, 34.9, 34.6, 33.7, 24.7, 24.0, 18.7, 17.8, 17.3, 15.3, 9.9; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₃₁H₄₇O₄482.3396 (Mâˆ’OH)⁺, found 482.3416; [Î±]²⁰_D+19.2 (c 0.24, CHCl₃).

4(R)-Benzyl-3-[4-(2,2-dimethyl-[1,3(S)]dioxolan-4-yl)-3(S)-hydroxy-2(R)-methyl-butyryl]-oxazolidin-2-one (56). Diisopropylethylamine (13 ml) was added to a solution of propionyloxazolidinone (13.1 g) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(250 ml) at 0Â° C., followed by dropwise addition of nBu₂BOTf (1.0M in CH₂Cl₂, 68 ml). The solution was stirred for 1 h at 0Â° C. A solution of crude aldehyde from 55 (8.9 g) prepared before in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(10 ml) was added slowly at âˆ’78Â° C. After addition, the reaction mixture was warmed to 0Â° C. and stirred for 1 h then quenched with pH7 phosphate buffer (20 mL). A solution of hydrogen peroxide (30%, 40 mL) in MeOH (80 mL) was added at 0Â° C. and the mixture was allowed to stir for 1 h. The reaction mixture was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(50 mLÃ—2) and dried over MgSO₄followed by flash chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:1) to yield 20.7 g of product (98%): IR (CHCl₃) 3434, 2956, 2929, 2858, 1724, 1472, 1463, 1257, 1097, 836, 775 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] 7.33 m, 3H), 7.22 (m 2H), 4.72 (ddd, J=10.5, 6.9, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (m, 1H), 4.23 (m, 3H), 4.12 (dd, J=8.5, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (ddd, J=10.2, 7.0, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (dd, J=13.4, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J=13.4, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 1.80 (ddd, J=14.2, 9.7, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 1.68 (ddd, J=10.8, 7.8, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 1.43 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.30 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 176.9, 152.9, 134.9, 129.3, 128.8, 127.3, 108.6, 73.4, 69.5, 68.5, 66.0, 54.9, 42.4, 37.5, 26.8, 25.6, 14.1, 10.8; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’28.1 (c 4.1, CHCl₃).

6-(2,2-Dimethyl-[1,3(S)]dioxolan-4-yl)-5(S)-hydroxy-4(R)-methyl-hex-2-enoic acid ethyl ester (57). To a solution of RED-A1 (4.6 ml) in THF (100 ml) at âˆ’78Â° C. was added aldol product 56 (5.39 g) in THF (10 ml) slowly over 10 min. The evolution of gas could be seen as the solution was stirred for 10Ëœ15 min at âˆ’78Â° C. The reaction was then warmed to âˆ’50Â° C. and stirred between âˆ’55 and âˆ’40Â° C. for 1 h. The reaction was quenched at âˆ’50Â° C. with 100 ml of EtOAc and 10 ml of MeOH and then poured into a mixture of sat'd Rochelle salt (30 ml) and Et₂O (60 ml) and stirred at âˆ’20Â° C. for 10 min. The aqueous layer froze as a gel. The ether layer was separated and the aqueous layer rinsed quickly with Et₂O (2Ã—30 ml). The combined organic extracts were dried over MgSO₄and concentrated in vacuo. The crude aldehyde was taken immediately on to the Wittig reaction. To a 200 ml of dry THF was added 3.26 ml of triethylphosphonoacetate, followed by 1.86 g of potassium tert-butoxide. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min before cooling to âˆ’78Â° C. The crude aldehyde was added in 20 ml of THF and stirred overnight while warming to room temperature. The mixture was poured into 30 ml of brine, extracted with Et₂O (3Ã—40 ml), dried over MgSO₄and concentrated in vacuo. Flash silica gel chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 3:2) provided 2.02 g (52% for 2 steps) of pure product as an colorless oil: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] 6.88 (dd, J=15.8, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (m, 1H), 4.14 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (dd, J=8.1, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (m, 1H), 3.53 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (brs, 1H), 2.41 (m, 1H), 1.72-1.56 (m, 2H), 1.37 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H),1.24 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.07 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.4, 150.3, 121.6, 108.6, 73.5, 71.3, 69.3, 60.2, 42.8, 37.2, 25.8, 25.5, 14.5, 14.1.

5(S),7(S),8-Tris-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-4(R)-methyl-oct-2-enoic acid ethyl ester (58). To a stirred solution of conjugated ester 57 (1.73 g) in MeOH (20 ml) was added Dowex HCR-W2 ion-exchange resin (2.0 g, activated by aqueous 1N HCl for 24 h then filtered, MeOH as eluent) and stirred for 24 h. The resin was filtered and filtrate was concentrated and dried for 2 h in vacuo. The triol was then used in next step without further purification. To a stirred solution of triol and 2,6-lutidine (3.3 mL, 28.6 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(30 mL) at 0Â° C. was added TBDMSOTf (5.1 mL, 22.2 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of water (25 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted by CH₂Cl₂and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by short column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) whereupon the 58 (2.96 g, 81% for 2 steps) was obtained: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] 7.04 (dd, J=15.9, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (dd, J=15.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (dq, J=1.3, 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (quint, J=3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (m, 1H), 3.49 (dd, J=10.1, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (dd, J=10.1, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (m, 1H), 1.59-1.40 (m, 2H), 1.25 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (m, 27H), 0.056 (s, 3H), 0.049 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.02 (s, 3H), 0.01 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.6, 151.7, 120.8, 72.8, 71.4, 68.0, 60.0, 42.2, 39.5, 25.9, 25.7, 18.3, 18.1, 14.2, 13.3, âˆ’3.0, âˆ’3.6, âˆ’4.2, âˆ’4.5, âˆ’5.4.

5(5),7(5)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-8-hydroxy-4(R)-methyl-oct-2-enoic acid ethyl ester (59): To a solution of TBS ether 58 (7.4 g, 12.9 mmol) in THF (10 ml) was slowly added HF-pyridine in pyridine (40 ml, prepared by slow addition of 12 ml pyridine to 3 ml HF-pyridine complex followed by dilution with 25 ml THF). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and quenched with sat'd NaHCO₃(100 ml). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with Et₂O (3Ã—50 ml). The combined organic layers were washed with sat'd CuSO₄(3Ã—50 ml), dried over MgSO₄, and concentrated. Flash column chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:4) afforded 3.86 g (65%) of the alcohol 59: IR (CHCl₃) 3492, 2956, 2930, 2857, 1722, 1472, 1367, 1256, 1092, 1039, 836, 775 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] 7.01 dd, J=15.9, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 5.75 (dd, J=15.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (dq, J=1.2, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.75 (m, 1H), 3.56 (m, 1H), 3.40 (m, 1H), 2.44 (m, 1H), 1.85 (t, J=5.9 Hz, 1H), 1.61 (ddd, J=11.5, 6.4, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 1.50 (ddd, J=13.0, 7.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.25 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (s, 9H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 0.60 (s, 6H), 0.34 (s, 3H), 0.02 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.5, 151.1, 121.1, 72.8, 71.0, 66.9, 60.1, 41.8, 38.7, 25.8, 18.0, 14.2, 13.3, âˆ’4.2, âˆ’4.3.

5(S),7(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-4(R)-methyl-8-oxo-oct-2-enoic acid ethyl ester (60). The alcohol 59 (3.86 g, 8.34 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(20 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (5.3 g, 12.5 mmol). After 1 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(50 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (20 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided the aldehyde as a colorless oil: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) [Image Omitted] 9.53 (s, 1H), 7.02 dd, J=15.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.77 (dd, J=15.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (dq, J=1.0, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.07 (ddd, J=6.4, 4.8, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (ddd, J=8.6, 6.8, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (m, 1H), 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.25 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.99 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.86 (s, 9H), 0.07 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s, 3H), 0.03 (s, 6H).

5(S),7(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-10(S)-[2-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1,3(R)]dioxan-4-yl]-4(R)-methyl-undeca-2,8-dienoic acid ethyl ester (61). NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 12.3 mL, 12.3 mmol) was slowly added to a solution of the salt 21 (8.72 g, 13.7 mmol) in dry THF (13.7 mL) at 0Â° C. The resulting red solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 60 (5.03 g, 10.9 mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and then warmed to room temperature. After 4 h at room temperature, the mixture was quenched with saturated NH₄Cl (20 mL) and extracted with ethyl ether (3Ã—30 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and the residue was flash column chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) to yield 61(5.65 g, 75%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2957, 2929, 2856, 1720, 1650, 1617, 1518, 1463, 1370, 1250, 1158, 1073, 1032, 836, 774 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´7.34 m, 2H), 6.99 (dd, J=15.8, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (m, 2H), 5.72 (dd, J=15.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (s, 1H), 5.32 (dd, J=11.1, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 5.18 (t, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (ddd, J=12.6, 8.6, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (m, 2H), 3.99 (d, J=7.2, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (m, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.52 (dd, J=9.3, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (m, 1H), 2.37 (m, 1H), 1.64 (m, 1H), 1.46 (m, 2H), 1.22 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.15 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 6H), 0.86 (s, 18H), 0.06 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.02 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.5, 159.7, 151.9, 133.8, 132.7, 131.3, 120.8, 113.4, 101.7, 83.6, 73.8, 71.9, 66.4, 60.0, 55.1, 43.6, 42.9, 34.2, 29.8, 26.0, 25.9, 18.1, 15.6, 14.2, 13.5, 11.2, âˆ’3.0, âˆ’3.8, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.5; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₃₆H₆₆O₇Si₂K 729.3984 (M+K)⁺, found 729.4013; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’8.7 (c 6.8, CHCl₃).

5(S),7(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-10(S)-[2-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1,3(R)]dioxan-4-yl]-4(R)-methyl-undeca-2,8-dien-1-ol (62). To the stirried solution of ester 61 (3.13 g, 4.53 Î¼mol) in EtOH (20 ml), THF (2 ml) was added 1N aqueous KOH solution (45 ml) and the mixture was refluxed gently until the ester disappeared (about 6 h) as determined by TLC. The ethanolic solution was concentrated and then diluted with EtOAc (50 ml). After the solution was acidified to pH 3 with 1N HCl solution, organic phase was separated and aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—10 ml). The combined organic phase were dried with MgSO₄, concentrated and used as crude in next step without further purification. The carboxylic acid was treated with NEt₃(1.5 ml) and ethyl chloroformate (0.67 ml) in dry THF (50 ml) at âˆ’10Â° C. After 15 min, the mixture was warmed to 0Â° C. and a solution of NaBH, (1.2 g) in H₂O (10 ml) were added. After 4 h, the reaction was quenched by addition of sat'd Rochelle salt solution and Et₂O. The layers were separated and the organic layer was washed with H₂O, sat'd NaHCO₃solution and brine, dried with MgSO₄. Rotary evaporation and silica column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) gave product 62 (1.79 g, 61%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3433, 2957, 2929, 2856, 1617, 1518, 1462, 1388, 1250, 1074, 836, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.38 (m, 2H), 6.84 (m, 2H), 5.63 (dd, J=15.7, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (dt, J=16.0, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (t, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (m, 1H), 3.99 (m, 2H), 3.93 (m, 1H), 3.87 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.49 (dd, J=9.6, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (m, 1H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 1.79 (brs, 1H), 1.64 (m, 1H), 1.44 (m, 2H), 1.15 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (m, 21H), 0.09 (s, 3H), 0.06 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s, 6H); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.6, 134.4, 134.3, 132.4, 131.5, 129.1, 127.4, 113.4, 101.5, 83.5, 73.8, 72.8, 66.5, 63.7, 55.2, 42.2, 34.1, 29.8, 26.1, 25.9, 18.14, 18.10, 15.5, 15.2, 11.3, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.2; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₃₆H₆₄O₆Si₂Na 671.4139 (M+Na)⁺, found 671.4141; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’14.0 (c 1.5, CHCl₃).

4-[4(S),6(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-[(S),7(R)-dimethyl-10-trityloxy-deca-2,8-dienyl]-2-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1,3(R)]dioxane (63). To a solution of alcohol 62 (0.105 g) in pyridine (1.6 ml) was added trityl chloride (0.094 g) and DMAP (0.041 g). The mixture was then refluxed for 18 h, cooled to ambient temperature and added to a solution of sat'd CuSO₄(20 ml). The mixture was extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—20 ml), washed sat'd CuSO₄(2Ã—20 ml). The organic layer was separated, dried (MgSO₄), filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:9) provided product 63 (0.142 g, 99%) as a pale yellow oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2926, 2855, 1616, 1517, 1462, 1378, 1249, 1073, 835, 773, 705 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.63 (m, 6H), 7.51 (m, 2H), 7.40 (m, 9H), 6.93 (m, 2H), 5.91 (dd, J=15.7, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (dt, J=15.5, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (m, 1H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.39 (t, J=10.2 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (dt, J=3.1, 8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (m, 3H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.70 (m, 3H), 2.85 (m, 1H), 2.45 (m, 1H), 1.78 (m, 1H), 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.31 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.08 (m, 24H), 0.28 (s, 3H), 0.27 (s, 3H), 0.25 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.5, 146.8, 144.3, 135.0, 134.1, 132.4, 131.3, 128.6, 127.8, 127.6, 127.3, 127.1, 126.7, 126.3, 113.3, 101.5, 86.6, 83.4, 73.8, 72.7, 66.6, 65.0, 55.0, 43.5, 42.8, 34.2, 29.9, 26.1, 25.9, 18.1, 15.7, 14.5, 11.3, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’3.8, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.3; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₅₅H₇₈O₆Si₂K 929.4969 (M+K)⁺, found 929.5008; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’7.3 (c 1.1, CHCl₃).

7(S),9(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-3-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-2(S)(S),10(R)-trimethyl-13-trityloxy-trideca-5,11-dien-1-ol (64). To the PMB acetal 63 (3.75 g. 4.21 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(20 ml) was added DIBAL-H (21 ml, 21 mmol, 1.0 M solution in hexane) at âˆ’78Â° C. dropwise and then warmed up to 0Â° C. and stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was quenched by EtOAc (10 ml) and sat'd sodium potassium tartrate solution (50 mL) followed by vigorously stirring for 4 h. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(3Ã—20 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (30 mL). After drying over MgSO₄and evaporation under vacuum, flash column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) provided 64 (2.78 g, 74%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3434, 2956, 2928, 2856, 1612, 1514, 1471, 1249, 1073, 836, 774, 706 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.48 (m, 6H), 7.29 (m, 11H), 6.84 (m, 2H), 5.84 (dd, J=15.7, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (dt, J=15.7, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (t, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 4.63 (m, 1H), 4.53 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.57 (d, J=4.8 Hz, 2H), 3.48 (m, 1H), 3.31 (m, 2H), 2.80 (m, 1H), 2.42 (m, 1H), 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.55 (ddd, J=14.2, 10.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 1.40 (ddd, J=13.9, 8.6, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.07 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (m, 12H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.87 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.16 (s, 3H), 0.15 (s, 3H), 0.11 (s, 3H), 0.10 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.0, 144.3, 134.0, 133.7, 131.5, 130.9, 129.3, 128.6, 127.9, 127.7, 127.2, 126.8, 126.5, 113.6, 86.7, 84.0, 73.9, 73.0, 66.2, 65.8, 65.1, 55.2, 42.3, 42.2, 38.0, 35.1, 26.0, 25.9, 18.5, 18.2, 18.1, 14.8, 12.0, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.19, âˆ’4.23; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₅₅H₈₀O₆Si₂K 931.5125 (M+K)⁺, found 931.5152; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’21.4 (c 0.52, CHCl₃).

9(S),11(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-5(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-4(S),6(S),12(R)-trimethyl-15-trityloxy-pentadeca-2,7,13-trienoic acid ethyl ester (65). The alcohol 64 (2.01 g, 2.25 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(20 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (1.43 g, 3.4 Î¼mol). After 1 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(20 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (25 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 3:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. To a stirred solution of triethyl phosphonoacetate (0.51 ml, 2.6 â–¡mol) in THF (20 ml) cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. was added dropwise potassium tert-butoxide (0.29 g, 2.50 mol) and stirred for 30 min. Thereafter the above aldehyde in THF (5 ml) was added and the solution was stirred for 1 h at âˆ’78Â° C., then 2 h at 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was quenched by addition â€˜of a satâ€™ d NH₄Cl solution (5 ml) and diluted with diethyl ether (20 ml). The layer was separated and organic phase was washed with brine (20 ml) and dried with MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:9), yielding 2.01 g of unsaturated ester 65 (93% for 2 steps): IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2929, 2856, 1718, 1650, 1612, 1514, 1448, 1250, 1180, 1074, 836, 774, 706 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.55 (m, 6H), 7.34 (m, 11H), 7.09 (dd, J=15.8, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (m, 2H), 5.89 (dd, J=15.7, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.78 (d, J=15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.66 (dt, J=6.0, 15.7 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (m, 2H), 4.66 (m, 1H), 4.51 (m, 2H), 4.23 (m, 2H), 3.99 (m, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.66 (d, J=5.3 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (t, J=4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (m, 1H), 2.65 (m, 1H), 2.49 (m, 1H), 1.60 (m, 1H), 1.48 (m, 1H), 1.33 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.12 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.11 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 3H), 1.06 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (s, 9H), 1.00 (s, 9H), 0.20 (s, 3H), 0.19 (s, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H), 0.15 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.5, 158.9, 152.2, 144.3, 134.3, 133.9, 131.0, 130.5, 129.3, 128.6, 127.6, 126.7, 126.4, 120.2, 113.5, 107.0, 86.6, 85.5, 73.4, 72.8, 66.3, 65.1, 59.9, 55.1, 42.2, 38.9, 35.2, 26.0, 25.9, 18.2, 18.1, 14.6, 14.2, 13.7, âˆ’3.0, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.2, âˆ’4.3; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₅₉H₈₄O₇Si₂K 999.5393 (M+K)⁺, found 999.5387; [Î±]²⁰_D+4.6 (c 3.1, CHCl₃).

9(S),11 (S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-5(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-4(S),6(S),12(R)-trimethyl-15-trityloxy-pentadeca-7,13-dienoic acid ethyl ester (66). To a stirred solution of unsaturated ester 65 (2.02 g, 2.100 mol) in MeOH (10 ml), THF (1 ml) at 0Â° C. was added 0.25 g of NiCl₂.6H₂O then portionwise NaBH₄(0.16 g). After 1 h, the reaction mixture was evaporated and filtered with Celite using Et₂O as an eluent (5 ml). The organic phase was concentrated and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:9) to yield 1.96 g (2.04 Î¼mol) of product 66 (97%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2929, 2856, 1735, 1613, 1514, 1479, 1448, 1374, 1249, 1174, 1072, 836, 773, 706 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.53 (m, 6H), 7.33 (m, 11H), 6.84 (m, 2H), 5.81 (dd, J=15.7, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (m, 1H), 5.45 (m, 2H), 4.65 (m, 1H), 4.56 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.62 (m, 2H), 3.14 (m, 1H), 2.79 (m, 1H), 2.43 (m, 1H), 2.23 (m, 1H), 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.54 (m, 3H), 1.28 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.06 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (s, 18H), 0.93 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H), 0.154 (s, 31H), 0.151 (s, 3H), 0.14 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 173.6, 158.8, 144.4, 134.6, 133.6, 132.1, 131.2, 129.1, 128.7, 127.7, 126.8, 126.4, 103.4, 86.6, 86.1, 73.8, 72.8, 66.5, 65.2, 60.0, 55.1, 42.8, 42.3, 35.4, 35.1, 32.3, 29.4, 26.0, 25.9, 18.4, 18.1, 14.6, 14.2, 13.9, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₅₉H₈₆O₇Si₂K 1001.5549 (M+K)⁺, found 1001.5586; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’9.8 (c 0.95, CHCl₃).

4(R)-Benzyl-3-[9(S),11(S)-bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-5(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-4(R),6(S),12(S)-trimethyl-15-trityloxy-pentadeca-7,13-dienoyl]-oxazolidin-2-one (68). To the stirred solution of ester 66 (1.61 g, 1.670 mol) in EtOH (20 ml), THF (2 ml) was added 1N aqueous KOH solution (17 ml) and the mixture was refluxed gently until the ester disappeared (about 6 h) as determined by TLC. The ethanolic solution was concentrated and then diluted with EtOAc (20 ml). After the solution was acidified to pH3 with 1N HCl solution, organic phase was separated and aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—10 ml). The combined organic phase were dried with MgSO₄, concentrated and used as crude without further purification. A solution of the above acid and Et₃N (0.47 ml) in dry THF (17 ml) was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C., treated dropwise with pivaloyl chloride (0.25 ml), stirred in the cold for 1 h, and warmed to 0Â° C. prior to the addition of the (S)-oxazolidinone 4 (0.30 g) and LiCl (0.21 g). This reaction, mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and diluted with water (10 ml). The separated aqueous phase was extracted with ether (2Ã—10 ml) and the combined organic phase were dried and evaporated and flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:4) gave the product 68 (1.52 g, 83%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2856, 1785, 1701, 1612, 1513, 1449, 1385, 1249, 1074, 910, 836, 774, 734, 706 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.47 (m, 6H), 7.30 (m, 10H), 7.24 (m, 6H), 6.78 (m, 2H), 5.75 (dd, J=15.7, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.54 (dt, J=15.5, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (m, 2H), 4.62 (m, 2H), 4.55 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (m, 2H), 3.91 (m, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.56 (m 2H), 3.30 (dd, J=13.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (dd, J=6.7, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (m, 2H), 2.77 (m, 2H), 2.37 (m, 1H), 1.78 (m, 2H), 1.61 (m, 3H), 1.44 (m, 3H), 1.01 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (m, 21H), 0.12 (s, 3H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 173.1, 158.7, 153.2, 144.3, 135.3, 134.7, 133.6, 132.5, 131.2, 129.3, 129.1, 128.8, 128.6, 127.6, 127.2, 126.7, 126.2, 113.4, 86.5, 85.8, 73.7, 72.7, 66.4, 65.9, 65.1, 55.0, 42.8, 42.4, 37.8, 35.5, 34.9, 33.5, 28.7, 26.0, 25.9, 18.2, 18.1, 14.5, 13.9, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.2; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₆₇H₉₁NO₈Si₂K 1132.5920 (M+K)⁺, found 1132.5874; [Î±]²⁰_D+14.8 (c 0.61, CHCl₃).

4(R)-Benzyl-3-[9(S),11 (S)-bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-5(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-2(S),4(S),6(S),12(R)-tetra methyl-15-trityloxy-pentadeca-7,13-dienoyl]-oxazolidin-2-one (69). NaHMDS (1.0 M in THF, 1.68 ml) was added at âˆ’78Â° C. to a solution of 68 (1.67 g) in THF (4 ml). After 30 min, the reaction mixture was treated with MeI (0.29 ml) at âˆ’78Â° C., stirred for an additional 4 h, quenched with sat'd aqueous NH₄Cl, and extracted with ether (2Ã—10 ml). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO₄), concentrated and purified by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:9) to give product 69 (1.05 g, 62%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2957, 2929, 2856, 1783, 1697, 1513, 1449, 1385, 1249, 1074, 836, 774, 705 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.49 (m, 6H), 7.29 (m, 16H), 6.80 (m, 2H), 5.79 (dd, J=15.6, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.56 (dt, J=15.6, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (m, 2H), 4.62 (m, 2H), 4.56 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.17 (m, 1H), 4.05 (m, 1H), 3.92 (m, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.58 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.27 (m, 1H), 3.08 (dd, J=6.3, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 2.77 (m, 2H), 2.38 (m, 1H), 1.76 (m, 1H), 1.64 (m, 2H), 1.46 (m, 4H), 1.10 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (d, J=6.3 Hz, 3H), 0.98 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (m, 21H), 0.14 (s, 3H), 0.11 (s, 6H), 0.10(s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 177.3, 158.7, 152.8, 144.4, 135.3, 134.9, 133.6, 132.3, 131.3, 129.4, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 127.6, 127.2, 126.7, 126.3, 113.5, 86.6, 86.5, 74.0, 72.8, 66.5, 65.8, 65.2, 43.0, 42.5, 37.8, 35.4, 35.3, 33.0, 26.3, 26.0, 25.9, 18.3, 18.1, 17.4, 14.5, 14.2, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.1, 4.2; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₆₈H₉₃NO₈Si₂K 1146.6077 (M+K)⁺, found 1146.6079; [Î±]²⁰_D+16.70 (c 1.1, CHCl₃).

9(S),11(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-5(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-2(5),4(S),6(S),12(R)-tetramethyl-15-trityloxy-pentadeca-7,13-dien-1-ol (70). To a stirred solution of 69 (0.41 g, 0.37 mmol) in THF (1.5 ml) at 0Â° C. was added MeOH (0.015 ml) and LiBH₄(0.81 ml, 2.0 M soln in THF) dropwise. After stirring 2 h at 0Â° C., saturated sodium potassium tartrate (10 ml) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(10 mlÃ—2). The combined organic layer were washed with brine (10 ml) and dried over anhydrous MgSO₄, evaporated and the residue was chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to yield 70 (0.30 g, 87%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 3400, 2956, 2928, 2856, 1613, 1514, 1449, 1377, 1249, 1074, 836, 774, 706 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.48 (m, 6H), 7.29 (m, 11H), 6.84 (m, 2H), 5.78 (dd, J=15.7, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (dt, J=15.7, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (m, 1H), 5.35 (m, 1H), 4.59 (t, J=9.5, Hz, 1H), 4.48 (q, J=10.9 Hz, 2H), 3.92 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.57 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 2H), 3.25 (m 2H), 3.03 (t, J=4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (m 1H), 2.41 (m, 1H), 1.75 (m, 1H), 1.55 (m, 2H), 1.32 (m, 2H), 1.17 (m, 2H), 1.07 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (s, 9H), 0.91 (m, 12H), 0.72 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.13 (s, 3H), 0.12 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H), 0.07 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 158.9, 144.4, 134.4, 133.4, 131.5, 131.4, 129.1, 128.7, 127.7, 126.8, 126.5, 113.6, 87.6, 86.8, 74.1, 73.0, 68.9, 66.5, 65.4, 55.2, 42.7, 42.4, 37.1, 35.0, 33.1, 26.0, 25.9, 18.9, 18.1, 15.8, 14.9, 14.7, âˆ’2.8, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.06, âˆ’4.10; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₅₈H₈₆O₆Si₂K 973.6301 (M+K)⁺, found 973.6264; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’31.7 (c 1.3, CHCl₃).

{3(R)-[2-(4-Methoxy-phenyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1 (S),3]dioxan-4-yl]-2-oxo-butyl}-phosphonic acid dimethyl ester (71). n-Butyllithium (4.5 ml, 1.6 M solution in hexane) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of dimethyl methanephosphonate (0.77 ml) in THF (7 ml) at âˆ’78Â° C. After 1 h, a solution of the known weinreb amide (Smith, A. B. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8654-8664) (0.46 g) in THF (0.5 ml) was added. After 30 min, the reaction was then allowed to warm to 0Â° C. and quenched by pouring into brine (100 ml) and extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—50 ml). The combined extracts were washed with brine (50 ml), dried over MgSO₄and concentrated in vacuo. Flash silica gel column chromatography (EtOAc) gave the desired product 71 (0.47 g, 85%) as a colorless oil: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.38 (m, 2H), 6.89 (m, 2H), 5.50 (s, 1H), 4.14 (dd, J=11.3, 4.7, Hz, 1H), 4.06 (dd, J=10.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 3.59 (t, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.42 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (d, J-=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.13 (d, J=14.5 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (dq, J=2.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.06 (m, 1H), 1.26 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.85 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 202.5, 159.5, 130.4, 126.9, 113.1, 100.5, 82.1, 72.4, 54.9, 52.6, 48.6, 39.3, 37.6, 30.6, 11.6, 8.7

13(S),15(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-2-[2-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1,3(S)]dioxan-4-yl]-9(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-6(S),8(S),10(S),16(R)-tetramethyl-19-trityloxy-nonadeca-4,11,17-trien-3-one (72). The alcohol 70 (0.30 g, 0.32 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (0.20 g, 0.47 Î¼mol). After 1 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (10 mLÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 4:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. A mixture of ketophosphonate 71 (0.14 g) and Ba(OH)₂(0.043 g, activated by heating to 100Â° C. for 1-2 h before use) in THF (2 ml) was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. A solution of the above aldehyde in wet THF (2 ml+2Ã—1 ml washings, 40:1 THF/H₂O) was then added and stirred for overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et₂O (10 ml) and washed with sat'd NaHCO₃(10 ml) and brine (10 ml). The organic solution was dried (MgSO₄) and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was chromatographed (hexane/EtOAc 4.5:1) to yield 72 (0.34 g, 90%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2957, 2929, 2855, 1615, 1515, 1461, 1249, 1076, 1036, 835, 774 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.47 (m, 6H), 7.38 (m, 2H), 7.28 (m, 12H), 6.89 (m, 2H), 6.78 (m, 2H), 6.22 (d, J=15.6 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (dd, J=15.7, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.57 (m, 1H), 5.45 (s, 1H), 5.38 (m, 2H), 4.60 (m, 1H), 4.52 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (dd, J=11.2, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (m, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.55 (m, 3H), 3.04 (m, 1H), 2.92 (m, 1H), 2.75 (m, 1H), 2.36 (m, 1H), 2.25 (quint, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.71 (m, 1H), 1.56Ëœ1.33 (m, 4H), 1.25 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.92 (m, 211H), 0.85 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 201.1, 159.7, 158.8, 153.1, 144.3, 134.6, 133.6, 132.4, 131.2, 131.0, 129.1, 128.6, 127.7, 127.2, 126.8, 126.3, 126.0, 113.5, 113.4, 100.7, 86.6, 85.7, 82.8, 73.8, 72.8, 66.4, 65.2, 55.2, 47.0, 42.8, 42.4, 40.4, 35.5, 34.2, 32.8, 32.2, 26.0, 25.9, 19.2, 18.4, 18.3, 18.1, 14.5, 14.4, 12.4, 10.7, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₇₄H₁₀₄O₉Si₂K 1231.6856 (M+K)⁺, found 1231.6850; [Î±]²⁰_D+22.8 (c 0.88, CHCl₃).

13(S),15(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-2-[2-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1,3(S)]dioxan-4-yl]-9(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-6(S),8(S),10(S),16(R)-tetramethyl-19-trityloxy-nonadeca-11,17-dien-3-one (73). To a stirred solution of unsaturated ketone 72 (0.34 g, 0.29 Î¼mol) in MeOH (4 ml), THF (0.5 ml) at 0Â° C. was added 0.034 g of NiCl₂, 6H₂O then portionwise NaBH₄(0.022 g). After 1 h, the reaction mixture was evaporated and filtered with Celite using Et₂O as a eluent (5 ml). The organic phase was concentrated and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:4) to yield 0.31 g of product 73 (89%) as a colorless oil: IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2929, 2855, 1713, 1614, 1515, 1461, 1249, 1075, 1036, 835, 774, 706 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.47 (m, 6H), 7.29 (m, 13H), 6.87(m, 2H), 6.80 (m, 2H), 5.75 (dd, J=15.7, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (m, 1H), 5.45 (s, 1H), 5.38 (m, 2H), 4.60 (m, 1H), 4.48 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (dd, J=11.2, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.55 (m, 2H), 2.99 (m, 2H), 2.70 (m, 2H), 2.45 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (m, 1H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.75 (m, 1H), 1.63 (m, 1H), 1.49 (m, 2H), 1.37 (m, 3H), 1.23 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.02 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (m, 21H), 0.81 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.80 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.12 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 6H), 0.08 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 211.9, 159.8, 158.8, 144.6, 144.4, 134.9, 133.4, 132.3, 131.8, 131.5, 131.0, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 127.7, 127.6, 127.2, 126.8, 126.7, 126.3, 113.5, 100.8, 87.4, 86.7, 83.1, 74.0, 72.9, 66.6, 65.2, 55.22, 55.18, 48.3, 43.1, 42.5, 41.6, 38.3, 35.5, 32.7, 31.5, 31.3, 29.6, 26.1, 26.0, 19.0, 18.5, 18.1, 14.5, 14.1, 12.1, 9.7, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.2; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₇₄H₁₀₈O₉Si₂K 1233.7013 (M+K)⁺, found 1233.7036; [Î±]²⁰_D+3.0 (c 1.7, CHCl₃).

13(S),15(S)-Bis-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-2-[2-(4-methoxy-benzyl)-5(S)-methyl-[1,3(S)]dioxan-4-yl]-9(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-6(S),8(S),10(S),16(R)-tetramethyl-19-trityloxy-nonadeca-11,17-dien-3-ol (74). To a solution of 73 (0.27 g) in MeOH (4 ml) was added NaBH₄(0.013 g) at 0Â° C. After stirring for 2 h at 0Â° C., the reaction mixture was evaporated and water (5 ml) was added. The reaction mixture was extracted with ether (2Ã—20 ml) and washed with brine (10 ml), dried over MgSO₄and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:4.5) to yield 0.19 g of major product 74 (71%) and 0.069 g (25%) of minor product as a colorless oil: (major isomer) IR (CHCl₃) 3533, 2956, 2929, 2855, 1614, 1515, 1462, 1250, 1072, 1036, 835, 774, 734 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.51 (m, 6H), 7.43 (m, 2H), 7.30 (m, 11H), 6.92 (m, 2H), 6.84 (m, 2H), 5.78 (dd, J=15.6, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (m, 1H), 5.57 (s, 1H), 5.43 (m, 2H), 4.65 (m, 1H), 4.55 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (dd, J=11.2, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (m, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.82 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.74 (m, 1H), 3.59 (m, 2H), 3.06 (m, 2H), 2.78 (m, 1H), 2.41 (m, 1H), 2.19 (m, 1H), 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.56 (dd, J=13.8, 8.1 Hz, 3H), 1.44 (m, 3H), 1.34 (m, 3H), 1.08 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 6H), 0.99 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (m, 18H), 0.90 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.16 (s, 3H), 0.14 (s, 6H), 0.13 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 160.0, 158.8, 144.6, 144.4, 134.9, 133.4, 132.3, 131.5, 130.7, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 127.7, 127.6, 127.2, 126.8, 126.7, 126.3, 113.7, 113.5, 89.0, 87.5, 86.7, 76.7, 74.0, 73.1, 72.8, 66.6, 65.2, 55.2, 55.1, 43.1, 42.5, 41.8, 37.4, 35.5, 34.4, 32.9, 32.4, 30.4, 30.1, 26.0, 25.9, 19.2, 18.5, 18.1, 14.5, 14.1, 11.9, 5.7, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.2; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₇₄H₁₀₈O₉Si₂K 1235.7169 (M+K)⁺, found 1235.7149; [Î±]²⁰_D+3.5 (c 0.6, CHCl₃).

5,15(S),17(S)-Tris-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-11(R)-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-3(S)-[2-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-ethoxy]-2(S),4(R),8(S),10(S),12(S),18(R)-hexamethyl-21-trityloxy-heneicosa-13,19-dien-1-ol (76). To a stirred solution of 74 (0.19 g, 0.16 mmol) and 2,6-lutidine (0.037 mL, 0.32 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(16 mL) at 0Â° C. was added TBDMSOTf (0.055 mL, 0.24 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was quenched by the addition of water (5 mL). The reaction mixture was extracted by CH₂Cl₂and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the solution under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by short column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1). To a stirred solution of TBS protected acetal (0.20 g, 0.15 mmol) in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂(3 mL), under an atmosphere of N₂at 0Â° C. was added diisobutylaluminum hydride (1.0 M in THF, 1.5 mL, 1.5 mmol) dropwise, and the reaction mixture was stirred for additional 1 h at 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was quenched by the careful addition of aqueous sat'd potassium sodium tartrate solution (10 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature. The organic layer was separated, and the water layer was extracted by CH₂Cl₂(20 mL). The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the organic solution under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:4) whereupon the pure compound 76 (0.19 g, 91% for 2 steps) was obtained: IR (CHCl₃) 3466, 2955, 2928, 2856, 1613, 1514, 1462, 1249, 1072, 1037, 835, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.52 (m, 6H), 7.30 (m, 13H), 6.94 (m, 2H), 6.85 (m, 2H), 5.79 (dd, J=15.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.59 (dt, J=15.7, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (m, 2H), 4.67 (m, 1H), 4.60 (s, 2H), 4.57 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (m, 1H), 3.91 (m, 1H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.68 (m, 2H), 3.60 (d, J=5.6 Hz, 11H), 3.52 (dd, J=6.6, 4.3 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (m, 2H), 2.97 (brs, 1H), 2.80 (dd, J=14.5, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (m, 1H), 2.02 (m, 1H), 1.95 (ddd, J=9.6, 6.9, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.71 (m, 1H), 1.56 (m, 3H), 1.47 (m, 3H), 1.33 (m, 2H), 1.19 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.08 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 6H), 1.00 (s, 9H), 0.97 (m, 21H), 0.90 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.82 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H), 0.15 (s, 3H), 0.14 (s, 3H), 0.137 (s, 3H), 0.133 (s, 3H), 0.127 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.3, 158.8, 144.6, 144.4, 135.0, 133.6, 132.5, 131.4, 130.6, 129.2, 129.0, 128.9, 128.7, 127.7, 127.6, 126.8, 126.7, 126.3, 113.9, 113.5, 87.4, 86.7, 85.9, 75.3, 74.0, 73.6, 72.8, 66.6, 65.2, 65.1, 55.2, 55.1, 43.2, 42.5, 42.0, 41.5, 37.0, 35.6, 33.4, 32.9, 31.9, 30.1, 26.08, 26.05, 25.98, 19.4, 18.4, 18.1, 15.8, 14.4, 13.9, 10.0, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’3.7, âˆ’3.9,âˆ’4.1, 4.2, âˆ’4.4; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₈₀H₁₂₄O₉Si₃K 1351.8190 (M+K)⁺, found 1351.8134; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’6.1 (c 0.48, CHCl₃).

7,17(S),19(S)-Tris-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-5(S),13(R)-bis-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-4(S),6(S),10(R),12(S),14(S),20(S)-hexamethyl-23-trityloxy-tetracosa-1,3,15,21-tetraen (77). The alcohol 76 (0.17 g, 0.13 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(5 ml) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (0.081 g, 0.21 mol). After 1 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(5 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (5 mlÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 4.5:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. To a stirred solution of the above crude aldehyde and 1-bromoallyl trimethylsilane (160 mg, 0.65 mmol) in anhydrous THF (3 ml) under an atmosphere of N₂at room temperature was added CrCl₂(0.13 g, 1.1 mmol) and the mixture was stirred for additional 14 h at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with hexane followed by filtration through celite. After the evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure, the residue was purified by short silica gel column chromatography using EtOAc/hexane (1:9). The foregoing product in THF (3 ml) was cooled to 0Â° C. and NaH (95% w/w, 64 mg, 2.56 mmol) was added in one portion. The ice bath was removed after 15 min and the mixture was stirred for 2 h at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0Â° C., quenched with H₂O (5 ml), extracted with ethyl ether (5 mlÃ—2). The combined organic layer was washed with brine and dried over MgSO₄followed by the evaporation of the organic solution under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 9:1) whereupon the pure compound 77 (122 mg, 72% for 3 steps) was obtained: IR (CHCl₃) 2955, 2928, 2856, 1613, 1514, 1462, 1249, 1072, 1039, 835, 773, 705 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.47 (m, 6H), 7.28 (m, 13H), 6.89 (m, 2H), 6.79 (m, 2H), 6.61 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.7, 10.6 Hz, 1H), 6.04 (t, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (dd, J=15.6, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.61 (t, J=10.4 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (m, 1H), 5.37 (m, 2H), 5.20 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.11 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (m, 3H), 4.50 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (m, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 3.62 (m, 1H), 3.54 (d, J=5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.35 (dd, J=7.7, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (m, 2H), 2.73 (m, 1H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 1.69 (m, 4H), 1.43 (m, 8H), 1.14 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (s, 9H), 0.92 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H), 0.89 (m, 6H), 0.83 (d, J=6.6 Hz, 3H), 0.72 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.11 (s, 3H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H), 0.07 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.0, 158.8, 144.6, 144.4, 135.0, 134.6, 133.7, 133.4, 132.6, 132.4, 131.5, 131.4, 129.1, 129.0, 128.98, 128.94, 128.7, 127.7, 126.8, 126.3, 117.2, 113.7, 113.5, 87.3, 86.7, 84.3, 75.0, 74.0, 72.9, 72.8, 66.6, 65.2, 55.2, 55.1, 43.2, 42.6, 42.0, 40.6, 35.7, 35.3, 33.2, 32.8, 32.3, 30.1, 26.1, 26.0, 19.4, 18.8, 18.3, 18.2, 18.1, 14.4, 14.0, 13.9, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’3.6, âˆ’3.9, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.2, âˆ’4.4; [Î±]²⁰_D+2.5 (c 1.2, CHCl₃).

7(S),9(S),19-Tris-(tert-butyl-dimethyl-silanyloxy)-13(R),21(S)-bis-(4-methoxy-benzyloxy)-6(R),12(S),14(S),16(S),20(R),22(S)-hexamethyl-hexacosa-2,4,10,23,25-pentaenoic acid methyl ester (79). A solution of 77 (18.6 mg) in CH₂Cl₂(0.2 ml) was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and B-chlorocatecholborane (0.25 M in CH₂Cl₂, 0.17 ml) was added. The solution was stirred at âˆ’78Â° C. for 1 h followed by treatment with sat'd aqueous NaHCO₃(1 ml). The resulting reaction mixture was then diluted with CH₂Cl₂(10 ml) and H₂O (3 ml). The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was further extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—5 ml). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO₄and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (hexane/EtOAc 4;1) on silica gel to yield 78 (9.4 mg) as a colorless oil. The alcohol 78 (20 mg, 0.018 Î¼mol) in CH₂Cl₂(0.5 mL) was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (12 mg, 0.028 Î¼mol). After 1 h, the mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(1 ml). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl ether (3 mlÃ—2) and the combined extracts were dried over anhydrous MgSO₄. Filtration and concentration followed by short flash column chromatography filtration (hexane/EtOAc 4.5:1) to remove the residue from Dess-Martin reagent provided crude aldehyde as a colorless oil which was used for the next reaction without further purification. To a stirred solution of bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)-(methoxycarbonylmethyl) phosphate (0.005 ml, 0.024 â–¡mol), 18-crown-6 (0.024 g, 0.09 mmol) in THF (0.5 ml) cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. was added dropwise potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (0.044 ml, 0.022 â–¡mol, 0.5M solution in toluene). Thereafter the above aldehyde in THF (0.5 ml) was added and the solution was stirred for 6 h at âˆ’78Â° C. The reaction mixture was quenched by addition of a sat'd NH₄Cl solution (1 ml) and diluted with diethyl ether (5 ml). The layers were separated and organic phase was washed with brine (5 ml) and dried with MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:9) yielding 17 mg of (E,Z)-doubly unsaturated ester 79 (82% for 2 steps): IR (CHCl₃) 2956, 2929, 2856, 1720, 1613, 1514, 1462, 1249, 1173, 1075, 836, 773 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.22 (m, 5H), 6.82 (m, 4H), 6.55 (ddd, J=16.8, 10.8, 10.8 Hz, 1H), 6.38 (t, J=11.4 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (dd, J=15.4, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (t, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.55 (t, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d, J=11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (m, 2H), 5.14 (d, J=16.8 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (m, 1H), 4.49 (m, 3H), 4.31 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 11H), 3.87 (m, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.68 (s, 3H), 3.57 (m, 11H), 3.29 (dd, J=7.7, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (m, 2H), 2.68 (m, 1H), 2.48 (m, 1H), 1.65 (m, 3H), 1.43-1.28 (m, 6H), 1.20 (m, 2H), 1.08 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (d, J=6.1 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.86 (m, 21H), 0.81 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.71 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 3H), 0.06 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s, 3H), 0.04 (s, 3H), 0.02 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.9, 159.0, 158.8, 147.7, 146.9, 145.8, 134.6, 133.5, 132.7, 132.5, 131.6, 131.4, 129.1, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.4, 127.9, 127.7, 127.3, 126.4, 117.2, 114.9, 113.7, 113.6, 87.6, 84.3, 77.2, 74.9, 74.2, 72.9, 72.7, 66.4, 55.3, 55.2, 50.9, 43.1, 42.5, 42.1, 40.6, 35.8, 35.3, 33.6, 33.2, 32.9, 18.14, 18.11, 14.6, 13.9, 9.3, âˆ’2.9, âˆ’3.6, âˆ’3.9, âˆ’4.1, âˆ’4.4; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C₆₇H₁₁₄O₉Si₃K 1185.7408 (M+K)⁺, found 1185.7464; [Î±]²⁰_Dâˆ’12.6 (c 0.75, CHCl₃).

8(S),10(S),14(R),20-Tetrahydroxy-7(S),13(S),15(S),17(R),21(S)-pentamethyl-22(S)-(1 (S)-methyl-penta-2,4-dienyl)-oxa-cyclodocosa-3,5,11-trien-2-one (83). The ester 79 (8.5 mg, 7.4 Î¼mol) was dissolved in CH₂Cl₂(1 ml)-H₂O (0.05 ml) and DDQ (5.0 mg, 22 Î¼mol) was added at 0Â° C. After 1 h of stirring at 0Â° C., the reaction mixture was quenched by adding sat'd NaHCO₃(5 ml). The organic phase was washed by sat'd NaHCO₃solution (3Ã—10 ml) and brine, dried over MgSO₄and concentrated. Purification by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:4.5) furnished diol (6.4 mg, 95%) as a colorless oil. To the stirried solution of the above diol (6.4 mg, 7.06 Î¼mol) in EtOH (0.7 ml) was added 1N aqueous KOH solution (0.07 ml) and the mixture was refluxed gently until the ester disappeared (about 7 h) as determined by TLC. The ethanolic solution was concentrated and then diluted with ether (4 ml). After the solution was acidified to pH3 with 1N HCl solution, organic phase was separated and aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—2 ml). The combined organic phase were dried with MgSO₄, concentrated and used as crude without further purification. A solution of above dihydroxy acid in THF (0.5 ml) was treated at 0Â° C. with Et₃N (0.006 ml, 43 Î¼mol) and 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride (0.0055 ml, 35 Î¼mol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0Â° C. for 30 min and then added to a 4-DMAP (3.5 ml, 0.02 M solution in toluene) at 25Â° C. and stirred for overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated, EtOAc (5 mL) was added and the crude was washed with 1N HCl (2Ã—5 ml), dried over MgSO₄. Purification by flash column chromatography (EtOAc/hexane 1:9) furnished macrolactone (3.0 mg, 49% for 2 steps) as a colorless oil. To a stirred solution of the above macrolactone (2.7 mg, 3.1 Î¼mol) in MeOH (0.5 ml) at 0Â° C. was added 0.5 ml of 3 N HCl (prepared by adding 25 ml of conc. HCl to 75 ml MeOH). After 2 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (2 ml) and H₂O (2 ml) and the organic phase was separated and aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—2 ml). The combined organic phase was washed with sat'd NaHCO₃(5 ml), dried with MgSO₄, concentrated and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (EtOAc/Hexane 1:1) to yield 83 (1.2 mg, 73%): IR (CHCl₃) 3400, 2960, 2926, 2854, 1693, 1635, 1599, 1461, 1378, 1277, 1183, 1075, 964 cm^âˆ’1; ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CD₃OD) Î´ 7.34 (dd, J=15.3, 11.3 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (ddd, J=16.9, 10.5, 10.3 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (t, J=11.4 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (t, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (dd, J=15.3, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (t, J=10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.47 (d, J=11.6 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (dd, J=11.1, 8.9 Hz, 11H), 5.27 (t, J=10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J=16.9 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (d, J=10.2 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (dd, J=8.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (dt, J=3.1, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (ddd, J=9.0, 6.3, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (ddd, J=10.2, 7.4, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (dd, J=5.4, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J=16.3, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (ddd, J=10.2, 6.7, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (dd, J=14.7, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.86 (dt, J=6.6, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 1.81 (ddd, J=10.5, 6.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.58 (m, 1H), 1.47 (ddd, J=13.8, 9.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 1.37 (m, 1H), 1.25 (m, 1H), 1.17 (m, 1H), 1.13 (m, 1H), 1.09 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 6H), 0.98 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 0.76 (d, J=6.4 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.3, 147.2, 145.3, 134.39, 134.37, 132.5, 132.3, 130.0, 127.6, 117.8, 116.5, 80.0, 75.4, 74.9, 72.0, 66.2, 43.2, 41.5, 40.7, 40.6, 35.6, 35.4, 35.0, 33.0, 31.2, 30.4, 20.4, 18.1, 17.3, 16.2, 12.4, 10.2; LRMS (ESI) calcd for C₃₂H₅₂O₆571.3 (M+K)⁺, found 571.3; [Î±]²⁰_D+32.6 (c 0.10, MeOH).

(Z)-(4R,5S,6S,7S)-tert-butyl-{6-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyloxy)-4-[4-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,11-heptadecafluoroundecyloxy)-benzyloxy]-5,7-dimethylundec-8-enyloxy}dimethylsilane (85). A mixture solution of 84 (0.40 g, 0.39 mmol) in MeOH (8.0 ml) and CH₂Cl₂(5.3 ml) was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and treated with a stream of ozone for 10 min. The reaction mixture was treated with dimethysulfide (2.0 ml) and pyridine (32 Î¼l) and stirred for 3.0 h at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was concentrated and diluted with Et₂O (80 ml). The organic layer was washed with saturated aqueous CuSO₄(2Ã—20 ml) and brine (20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated. At ambient temperature, a suspension of propyltriphenylphosphonium bromide (0.383 g 98% purity, 0.97 mmol) in THF (15.0 ml) was added NaN(TMS)₂(1.0 M solution in THF, 0.98 ml) at ambient temperature. After stirring 1 h, this solution was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. Then the crude residue in THF (2.0 ml) was introduced, and the resultant mixture was stirred for 3 h at âˆ’78Â° C. and was allowed to warm to ambient temperature for 12 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO₃(20 ml) and extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—40 ml). The combined extracts were washed with brine (20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated. Flash chromatography (10% AcOEt/hexane) afforded 85 (0.08 g, 26% yield): ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 0.06 (s, 6H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 0.93 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.06 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.47 (m, 2H), 1.59 (m, 1H), 1.66 (m, 1H), 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.94 (m, 2H), 2.11 (m, 2H), 2.33 (m, 2H), 2.66 (m, 1H), 3.35 (m, 1H), 3.60 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 6H), 4.04 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 2H), 4.38 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 5.35 (dt, J=7.0, 10.3 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (dd, J=10.3, 10.1 Hz, 1H), 6.82-7.02 (m, 4H), 7.21-7.28 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-5.2, 10.3, 14.5, 18.4, 18.9, 20.6, 20.9, 25.9, 26.9, 28.0 (t, J=22.5 Hz), 29.0, 34.9, 39.3, 55.8, 55.9, 63.2, 66.4, 70.8, 74.7, 79.4, 84.2, 110.5, 110.9, 114.3, 119.9, 106-122 (m), 129.6, 131.1, 131.3, 131.5, 131.6, 132.0, 148.4, 148.9, 158.2; IR (thin film/NaCl) cm^âˆ’12933, 2858, 1729, 1612, 1515, 1465, 1242, 1153, 1032, 834; MS (EI) m/z 1060 (M⁺), 1035, 1003, 909, 567; [âˆ ]_D²⁰+2.37Â° (c 0.590, CHCl₃).

(4R,5S,6S,7S)-tert-butyl-{6-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyloxy)-4-[4-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,13-heneicosafluorotridecyloxy)benzyloxy]-5,7-dimethyl-non-8-enyloxy}dimethylsilane (84). A solution of the alcohol (0.26 g, 0.57 mmol) and 1-bromomethyl-4-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,13-heneicosafluorotridecyloxy)benzene (0.50 g, 0.66 mmol) in THF (6.0 ml) was cooled to âˆ’40Â° C. and ^tBuOK (1.0 M solution in THF, 0.70 ml) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3.0 h. Then ^tBuOK (1.0 M solution in THF, 0.40 ml) was added again and the reaction solution was allowed to warm to ambient temperature for 9 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO₃(20 ml) and extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—40 ml). The combined extracts were washed with brine, (20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated. Flash chromatography (10% AcOEt/hexane) afforded 84 (0.326 g, 50% yield): ¹H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 0.55 (s, 6H), 0.91 (s, 9H), 1.06 (apparent d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.49 (m, 2H), 1.64 (m, 2H), 1.93 (m, 1H), 2.07 (m, 2H), 2.21-2.48 (m, 3H), 3.38 (m, 2H), 3.61 (t, J=6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 4.00 (t, J=5.7 Hz, 2H), 4.39 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.47 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (m, 2H), 5.92 (m, 1H), 6.79-6.91 (m, 4H), 7.27 (apparent d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 10.5, 14.0, 17.3, 18.3, 20.6, 22.7, 25.9, 26.9, 28.0 (t, J=22.2 Hz), 29.0, 38.5, 42.1, 55.7, 55.8, 63.1, 66.3, 70.9, 74.3, 79.9, 83.7, 110.9, 111.1, 114.3, 114.6, 119.9, 105-124 (m), 129.5, 131.6, 131.9, 141.2, 148.5, 148.9, 158.2; IR (thin film/NaCl) cm^âˆ’12928, 2858, 1611, 1515, 1242, 1154; MS (EI) m/z 1132 (M⁺), 1075, 981, 817, 667, 465; [âˆ ]_D²⁰+3.15Â° (c 1.11, CHCl₃).

(Z)-(4R,5S,6S,7S)-tert-Butyl-(6-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyloxy)-4-14-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,13-heneicosafluorotridecyloxy)benzyloxy]-9-iodo-5,7-dimethylnon-8-enyloxy}dimethylsilane (86). A mixture of 84 (0.326 g, 0.28 mmol) in MeOH (8.0 ml) and CH₂Cl₂(6.0 ml) was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and treated with a stream of ozone for 5 min. The reaction mixture was treated with dimethylsulfide (1.5 ml) and pyridine (23 Î¼l) and stirred for 3.0 h at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was concentrated and diluted with Et₂O (80 ml). The organic layer was washed with saturated aqueous CuSO₄(2Ã—20 ml) and brine (20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated. At ambient temperature, a suspension of (iodomethyl)triphenylphosphonium iodide (0.213 g, 0.40 mmol) in THF (3.0 ml) was added NaN(TMS)₂(1.0 M solution in THF, 0.40 ml). After stirring 0.5 h, this solution was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. Then HMPA (0.13 ml) and the crude residue in THF (2.0 ml) were introduced, and the resultant mixture was stirred for 20 min at âˆ’78Â° C. and stirred at ambient temperature for 0.5 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO₃(20 ml) and extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—40 ml). The combined extracts were washed with brine (20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated. Flash chromatography (10% AcOEt/hexane) afforded (Z)-(4R,5S,6S,7S)-tert-butyl-{6-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyloxy)-4-[4-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,13-heneicosafluorotridecyloxy)benzyloxy]-9-iodo-5,7-dimethylnon-8-enyloxy}dimethylsilane (0.119 g, 33% yield): ¹H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 0.04 (s, 6H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 1.03 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.04 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.23-1.77 (m, 5H), 2.04 (m, 2H), 2.23 (m, 2H), 2.70 (m, 1H), 3.44 (m, 2H), 3.59 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 4.03 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 2H), 4.40 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (s, 2H), 4.57 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 6.15 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (dd, J=7.3, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.80-6.89 (m, 4H), 7.22-7.30 (m, 2H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 6-5.2, 10.2, 14.2, 17.2, 18.4, 20.7, 22.8, 26.0, 27.3, 28.0 (t, J=22.1 Hz), 29.8, 31.7, 40.2, 42.9, 51.4, 55.9, 56.0, 63.3, 66.4, 71.1, 75.4, 78.9, 82.2, 84.1, 107-122 (m), 110.9, 111.2, 114.4, 120.1, 129.5, 131.6, 131.8, 143.2, 148.6, 148.9, 158.2; IR (thin film/NaCl) cm^âˆ’12956, 2859, 1727, 1611, 1514, 1467, 1243, 1154, 856; MS (EI) m/z 1201 (M⁺âˆ’C₄H₉), 1107, 667; [âˆ ]_D²⁰+4.04Â° (c 1.01, CHCl₃).

(Z)-(4R,5S,6S,7S)-tert-butyl-{6-(3,4-dimethoxybenzyloxy)-4-[4-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,13-heneicosafluorotridecyloxy)benzyloxy]-5,7-dimethyl-9-phenyl-non-8-enyloxy}dimethylsilane (87). To a solution of (Z)-(4R,5S,6S,7S)-tert-butyl-{6-(3,4-dimethoxy-benzyloxy)-4-[4-(4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,13-heneicosafluorotridecyloxy)benzyloxy]-9-iodo-5,7-dimethylnon-8-enyloxy}dimethylsilane (0.120 g, 0.09 mmol) and Pd(PPh₃)₄(0.011 g, 0.01 mmol) in THF (1.0 ml) was added PhZnI (0.5 M solution in THF, 0.97 ml) at ambient temperature. After stirring for 24 h, the reaction mixture was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO₃(20 ml) and extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—40 ml). The combined extracts were washed with brine (20 ml), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated. Flash chromatography (10% AcOEt/hexane) afforded 87 (0.0726 g, 63% yield): ¹H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 0.09 (s, 6H), 0.95 (s, 9H), 1.07 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.19 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.27-1.59 (m, 4H), 1.85 (m, 1H), 2.13 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 2H), 3.11 (m, 2H), 3.39 (brt, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.57 (t, J=6.2 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 4.02 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (t, J=5.8 Hz, 2H), 4.32 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (d, J=10.6 Hz, 1H), 5.83, (dd, J=11.5, 11.5 Hz, 1H), 6.53 (d, J=11.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86-7.37 (m, 9H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ âˆ’5.2, 10.2, 14.2, 18.4, 18.9, 20.7, 22.8, 26.1, 27.3, 27.8 (t, J=21.7 Hz), 28.9, 31.7, 35.6, 39.7, 55.8, 56.0, 63.3, 66.4, 71.2, 75.2, 79.9, 84.6, 107-122 (m), 110.9, 111.2, 114.3, 120.0, 126.7, 128.3, 128.7, 128.9, 129.3, 131.9, 135.3, 137.8, 148.5, 148.9, 158.1; IR (thin film/NaCl) cm^âˆ’1, 2926, 2857, 1727, 1515, 1464, 1242, 1154, 1031; MS (EI) m/z 1208 (M+), 1151, 1066, 667; [âˆ ]_D²⁰+3.73Â° (c 0.805, CHCl₃).

[2R]-Butane-1,2,4-triol. To a dry 1 L two-necked flask equipped with a pressure-equalizing addition funnel, a magnetic stirring bar and a reflux condenser was added THF (200 mL), B(OMe)₃(100 mL), and (R)-(+)-malic acid (40.0 g, 0.30 mol). To this solution was added dropwise BH₃â€”SMe₂(100 mL, 1.0 mol) over 2 h in a water bath as instantaneous H₂evolution occurred throughout the addition. After stirring for 20 h at rt, MeOH (200 mL) was added dropwise, and the resulting solution was filtered through a glass frit funnel charged with Celite to remove any solids. The clear, yellow filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to give a yellow oil. The residue was dissolved in MeOH (100 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. This was repeated 5 times giving 26.9 g of the triol (85%). The spectral data matched that of the known compound.

[2R]-2-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-[1,3]dioxan-4-yl]methanol (88). A solution of the triol (5.0 g, 47.1 mmol), p-anisaldehyde (9.62 g, 70.7 mmol), PPTS (0.12 g, 0.047 mmol) in benzene (100 mL) was refluxed for 10 h with the azeotropic removal of H₂O. NaHCO₃(0.20 g, 2.4 mmol) was added to the solution and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (20% to 50% EtOAc in hexanes) to give 88 (65%). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃)-7.41 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 4.28 (ddd, J=11.1, 5.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 4.00-3.95 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.67-3.64 (m, 2H), 2.04 (br s, 1H), 1.91 (dq, J=12.4, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 1.46-1.41 (m, 1H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃)â€”160.1, 132.0, 127.4, 113.6, 101.2, 76.6, 66.5, 65.6, 55.3, 26.9.

[2R]-tert-Butyl-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-[1,3]dioxan-4-ylmethoxy]diphenylsilane. A solution of alcohol 88 (8.13 g, 36.2 mmol), imidazole (3.9 g, 57.3 mmol), and TBDPSCl (10.2 mL, 39.7 mmol) in DMF (75 mL) was stirred overnight at room temperature under argon. A mixture of H₂O (250 mL) and EtOAc (150 mL) was added and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—100 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2Ã—100 mL), brine (100 mL), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude oil was purified by flash chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield 15.9 g (95%) of the silyl ether as a clear yellow oil. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.69-7.66 (m, 4H), 7.41-7.34 (m, 8H), 6.86 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 5.46 (s, 1H), 4.28 (dd, J=11.0, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.02-3.96 (m, 2H), 3.86-3.83 (m, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.67 (dd, J=10.2, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 1.84 (dq, J=12.2, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 1.65-1.61 (m, 1H), 1.05 (s, 9H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 160.0, 135.7, 133.4, 130.0, 129.6, 128.2, 128.0, 113.4, 101.0, 77.5, 66.9, 66.0, 55.3, 28.1, 26.8, 19.3.

4-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-butan-1-ol. To a stirred solution of the acetal (5.0 g, 10.8 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. was added slowly via cannula DibalH in toluene (33.0 mL, 1M). The reaction mixture was maintained at âˆ’78Â° C. for 12 h and quenched by slow addition to a vigorously stirred saturated solution of Rochelle salt in H₂O (70 mL). The emulsion was stirred until two layers formed (1 h). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(4Ã—15 mL) and the organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude oil was purified by flash chromotaography (20% to 50% EtOAc in hexanes) providing 4.01 g (80%) of the corresponding alcohol as a clear, yellow oil. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.69-7.66 (m, 4H), 7.43-7.38 (m, 6H), 7.20 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.60 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.77-3.66 (m, 5H), 1.82-1.79 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.3, 135.5, 133.2, 129.4, 129.0, 128.0, 127.6, 113.8, 78.3, 72.1, 66.4, 60.2, 55.2, 34.2, 26.8, 19.1.

4-(tert-Butyidiphenylsilanyloxy)-3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-butyraldehyde (89). DMSO (0.9 mL, 12.8 mmol) was added, dropwise, to a stirred solution of oxalyl chloride (0.5 mL, 6.0 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(8.0 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. under argon. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min then a solution of the alcohol (2.04 g, 4.41 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(27.0 mL) was added dropwise. After 1 h at âˆ’78Â° C., Et₃N (3.15 mL, 22.4 mmol) was added slowly via syringe, the mixture was stirred for 5 min then warmed to room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH₂Cl₂(30 mL), washed with ice cold 0.5 M HCl (50 mL) then H₂O (40 mL) and the layers were separated. The aqueous layers were combined and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—40 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The intermediate aldehyde 89 was used in the following reaction without purification: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.76 (s, 1H), 7.67-7.63 (m, 4H), 7.44-7.34 (m, 6H), 7.16 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.83 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H), 4.52 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.03-3.99 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.79-3.74 (m, 2H), 3.68-3.63 (m, 1H), 2.67 (dd, J=6.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 1.04 (s, 9H).

[3R,4R,6R]-7-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-6-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-3-methylhept-1-en-4-ol (90). A solution of (R,R)-diisopropyl tartrate (Z)-crotylboronate (15.0 mmol) was added to 4 â„« powdered molecular sieves (0.170 g) in toluene (8.4 mL) under argon and the mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde 89 (2.0 g, 4.4 mmol) in toluene (5.0 mL) was added dropwise via cannula. The resulting mixture was maintained at âˆ’78Â° C. for 3 h and then treated with NaBH₄(0.072 g, 1.75 mmol) in EtOH (2.0 mL) and warmed to 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was treated with 1N NaOH (30 mL) and stirred vigorously for 30 min, followed by separation of the organic layer. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(5Ã—55 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude oil was purified by flash chromatography (5% to 20% Et₂O in hexanes) providing 1.43 g (63% 2 seps) of alcohol, a clear oil: [Î±]²⁰_D=+0.32 (c 1.8, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.67 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.45-7.35 (m, 6H), 7.20 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.84 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.73 (ddd, J=18.2, 11.0, 7.4 Hz, 1H0, 5.03 (dd, J=11.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (dd, J=18.2, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 3.89-3.75 (m, 2H), 3.68-3.65 (m, 2H), 2.18 (sext, J=6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.84-1.55 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.01 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) 6159.0, 140.6, 135.6, 133.5 (2C), 130.3, 131.0, 127.6, 129.6, 114.4, 113.6, 72.2, 83.1, 64.1, 71.3, 55.2, 40.8, 37.2, 26.8, 19.2, 14.4; IR (thin film) 3056, 2989, 2859, 1513, 1426, 1248, 1112, 1077 cm¹; LRMS (EI) 517 (Mâˆ’H), 435, 333, 303, 255, 241, 223, 199, 135, 121 m/z.

[2R,4R,5R]-[2,4-bis-(4-Methoxybenzyloxy)-5-methylhept-6-enyloxy]tert-butyidiphenyl silane. A mixture of NaH (1.8 g, 7.23 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was cooled to 0Â° C. then DMF (5 mL), the alcohol (1.25 g, 2.41 mmol) in THF (5 mL), and PMBBr (1.14 g, 6.03 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 48 h. The resulting mixture was poured into a pH 7 phosphate buffer and diluted with ether (85 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with pH 7 buffer (3Ã—55 mL), dried over K₂CO₃, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude yellow oil was purified by flash chromatography (5% to 10% EtOAc in hexanes) providing 0.985 g (64%) of the PMB ether a clear, yellow tinted oil: [Î±]²⁰_D=+0.31 (c 1.8, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.69-7.65 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.37 (m, 6H), 7.22-7.19 (m, 4H), 6.86-6.84 (m, 4H), 5.73 (ddd, J=17.8, 9.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.04-4.99 (m, 2H), 4.64 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H),4.30 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.81-3.52 (m, 4H), 2.60-2.56 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.0 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.0, 140.6, 135.6, 133.5 (2C), 130.3, 131.0, 127.6, 129.6, 114.4, 113.6, 72.2, 83.1, 64.1, 75.4, 55.2, 40.8, 37.2, 26.8, 19.2, 14.4, âˆ’5.3; IR (thin film) 3055, 2985, 1422, 1280, 247 cm^âˆ’1; LRMS (EI) 581.34 (Mâˆ’C₄H₇), 579.34, 522.34, 444, 326, 383, 323, 339, 301, 255, 137, 122 m/z.

[2R,3R,5R]-6-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-3,5-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2-methylhexanal. To a solution of MeOH (30 mL), CH₂Cl₂(10 mL) and a few drops of pyridine was added the PMB ether (800 mg, 1.25 mmol) and the mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. Ozone was bubbled through the reaction mixture until a slight purple color was seen. Excess DMS (6.0 mL) was added to the solution and allowed to warm to RT. After 3 h, the mixture was concentrated in vacuo. The yellow residue was dissolved in h hexanes (60 mL) and washed with H₂O (2Ã—40 mL) and brine (20 mL). The organic layer was dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give the intermediate aldehyde (800 mg, 1.25 mmol) that was used in the following step without further purification: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.70 (d, J=2.0, 1H), 7.69-7.65 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.37 (m, 6H), 7.22-7.19 (m, 4H), 6.86-6.84 (m, 4H), 4.64 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.81-3.52 (m, 4H), 2.60-2.56 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.0 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H).

[4R,5R,7R]-8-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-5,7-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-4-methyloct-2-enoic acid ethyl ester (91). To a stirred suspension of NaH (36 g, 1.56 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) at 0Â° C. and under argon was added a solution of 2-(diethoxyphosphoryl)propionic acid ethyl ester (0.47 mL, 1.77 mmol) in toluene (0.40 mL) dropwise. The reaction mixture was warmed to rt for 30 min then recooled to 0Â° C. The intermediate aldehyde (0.5 g, 1.3 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added dropwise and the reaction mixture was stirred at 0Â° C. for 2 h. The solution was quenched by addition of pH 7 buffer (5 mL) and diluted with Et₂O (12 mL). The emulsion was warmed to rt and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with a saturated solution of NH₄Cl (10 mL) and the aqueous layers were combined and extracted with Et₂O (3Ã—20 ml). The organic layers were combined, dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (0% to 20% EtOAc in hexanes) to give 623 mg (70% 2 steps) of 91 a yellow oil: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.69-7.65 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.37 (m, 4H), 7.21-7.18 (m, 4H), 6.85-6.83 (m, 4H), 6.98 (dd, J=15.7, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (dd, J=15.7, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.50 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.81-3.52 (m, 4H), 2.60-2.56 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.0 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.3, 158.9, 150.5, 131.0, 130.0, 129.2, 129.1, 121.1, 113.5, 78.4, 75.9, 71.7, 71.2, 64.1, 59.9, 55.0, 38.9, 34.1, 25.7, 18.1, 14.4, 14.1, âˆ’5.5; IR (thin film) 3055, 2956, 2933, 2908, 2857, 1705, 1243, 1097 cm^âˆ’1; HRMS (EI) cald for C₄₃H₅₄O₇Si 710.3628, found 371.3627.

[4R,5R,7R]-8-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-5,7-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-4-methyloct-2-en-1-ol. To a stirred solution of ester 91 (600 mg, 0.84 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(6 mL) at âˆ’40Â° C. under argon was added slowly over 10 min via syringe DibalH in toluene (9 mL, 1M). After 30 min at âˆ’40Â° C., the reaction mixture was quenched by slow addition of MeOH (0.6 mL) and warmed to rt. The reaction mixture was poured into a vigorously stirred solution of saturated Rochelle salt in H₂O (8 mL) and EtOAc (12 mL) and stirred overnight; The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with EtOAc (3Ã—5 mL), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexanes) to produce 450 mg (80%) of the alcohol, a clear liquid: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.70-7.66 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.35 (m, 6H), 7.21-7.18 (m, 4H), 6.85-6.82 (m, 4H), 5.68-5.65 (m, 2H), 4.64 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (d, J=11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.10-4.06 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.81-3.52 (m, 4H), 2.60-2.56 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.03 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 159.0, 135.6, 135.1, 133.5 (2C), 131.1, 130.3, 130.0, 127.6, 129.4, 129.6, 83.1, 75.2, 72.4, 72.2, 64.4, 63.7, 55.2, 34.7, 26.8, 19.2, 15.4; IR (thin film) 3295, 3045, 2958, 2941, 2910, 2857, 1241, 1097 cm^âˆ’1; HRMS (EI) cald for C₄₁H₅₂O₆Si 668.3599, found 668.3596.

[2R,3R,5R]-8-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-5,7-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-4-methyl oct-2-enal. To a solution of the alcohol (400 mg, 0.59 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(2 mL) was added Dess-Martin periodane (330 mg, 0.78 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with Et₂O (10 mL) and poured into a stirring solution of saturated Na₂S₂O₃(5 mL) and saturated NaHCO₃(5 mL). The layers were separated and the organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO₃(3Ã—5 mL), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give the intermediate aldehyde which was used in the next reaction without further purification: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.50 (d, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.69-7.64 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.37 (m, 7H), 7.20-7.14 (m, 4H), 6.84-6.79 (m, 4H), 6.10 (dd, J=7.8, 17.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.81-3.52 (m, 4H), 2.60-2.56 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.00 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H).

[4R,5R,7R]-10-(tert-butyldiphenysilanyloxy)-7,9-bis(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-6-methyldeca-2,4-dienoicacid methyl ester. To a stirred solution of [bis-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phosphoryl]acetic acid methyl ester (210 mg, 0.65 mmol) in THF (12 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. under argon was added dropwise KHMDS in toluene (1.4 mL, 0.5 M). The reaction mixture was warmed to âˆ’40Â° C. for 1 h then cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and the intermediate aldehyde (400 mg, 0.59 mmol) in THF (0.5 mL) was added dropwise. After 3 h at âˆ’78Â° C., the solution was warmed to 0Â° C. and quenched by addition of a saturated solution of NH₄Cl (5 mL) and diluted with Et₂O (5 mL). The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with diethyl ether (5Ã—3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (5 mL), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (10% to 30% EtOAc in hexanes), yielding 220 mg (65% 2 steps) of conjugated ester, a clear oil: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.69-7.65 (m, 4H), 7.39-7.37 (m, 7H), 7.20-7.16 (m, 4H), 6.85-6.79 (m, 4H), 6.64 (t, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (ddd, J=15.4, 6.8 Hz, 1H), 5.87 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 5.04-4.99 (m, 2H), 4.64 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (d, J=11.1 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.81-3.52 (m, 4H), 2.60-2.56 (m, 1H), 1.57-1.51 (m, 2H), 1.05 (s, 9H), 1.00 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.9, 147.3, 145.4, 135.6, 133.5 (2C), 130.3, 129.6, 126.7, 115.5, 113.5, 78.4, 75.9, 71.7, 71.8, 64.1, 55.0, 51.1, 39.7, 34.1, 26.8, 19.2, 14.1; IR (CH₂Cl₂) 3048, 2987, 2931, 2875, 2822, 1715, 15251, 1423, 1250, 1110 cm^âˆ’1; HRMS (EI) cald for 722.3642, found 722.3640 m/z.

[6R,7S,9R]-10-Hydroxy-7,9-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-6-methyldeca-2,4-dienoic acid Methyl Ester (92). To a solution of the TBDPS ether (100 mg, 0.14 mmol) in THF 1 ml) was slowly added HF-pyridine in pyridine (1.5 ml, prepared by slow addition of 0.45 ml pyridine to 0.1 ml HF-pyridine complex followed by dilution with 0.94 ml THF) at 0Â° C. The mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was slowly quenched with saturated NaHCO₃(5 mL) and the aqueous layer was separated and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(5Ã—2 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with saturated CuSO₄(2 mL), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (25% EtOAc in hexanes) affording 50 mg (75%) of alcohol 92: [c]²⁰D=+8.56 (c 0.1, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.53 (dd, J=15.0, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35-7.30 (m, 4H), 6.97-6.93 (m, 6H), 6.65 (dd, J=11.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.23 (dd, J=15.0, 6.9 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (d, J=11.3 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.44 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (d, J=10.9 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 2.77-2.73 (m, 2H), 3.67-3.64 (m, 1H), 3.54 (dd, J=3.6, 11.5 Hz, 1H), 2.95-2.89 (m, 1H), 1.90-1.81 (m, 2H), 1.19 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 166.9, 159.0, 147.3, 145.4, 130.1, 130.3, 129.7, 126.7, 115.5, 113.6, 75.9, 78.5, 71.1, 63.9, 55.0, 51.0, 38.4, 33.7, 14.1; IR (thin film) 3315, 3055, 2986, 2858, 1710, 1513, 1423, 1247, 1105 cm^âˆ’1; LRMS (EI) 484, 469, 349, 425, 223, 121 m/z; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₈H₃₆O₇484.2582, found 484.2579.

(R,R)-diisopropyl tartrate (Z)-crotylboronate. An oven-dried 1 L three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a âˆ’100Â° C. thermometer was charged with 206 mL of anhydrous THF and KOtBu (28.2 g, 250 mmol). This mixture was flushed with Ar and cooled to âˆ’78Â° C., then cis-2-butene (23 mL, 250 mmol), condensed from a gas lecture bottle into a rubber-stoppered round bottom flask immersed in a âˆ’78Â° C. dry ice-acetone bath, was poured into the reaction mixture. n-BuLi (100 mL, 2.5 M in hexane) was then added dropwise via cannula over 1.5 h. After completion of the addition, the cooling bath was removed and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to âˆ’20 to âˆ’25Â° C. for 30 min before being recooled to âˆ’78Â° C. Triisopropylborate (57.8 mL, 250 mmol) was added drop-wise via cannula to the (Z)-crotylpotassium solution over 2 h. After addition, the reaction mixture was maintained at âˆ’78Â° C. for 30 min and then rapidly poured into a 2 L separatory funnel containing 470 mL of 1 N HCl saturated with NaCl. The aqueous layer was adjusted to pH 1 by using 1 N HCl (100-150 mL), and then a solution of (R,R)-diisopropyl tartrate (52.8 g, 250 mmol) in 88 mL of Et₂O was added. The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with additional Et₂O (4Ã—120 mL). The combined extracts were dried over MgSO₄for 1 h then vacuum filtered through a fritted glass funnel under Ar blanket into an oven-dried round-bottom flask. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo, and pumped to constant weight at under vacuum. Anhydrous toluene (170 mL) was added to the flask make a 1M solution.

[4S,3S,2R]-4-Benzyl-3-(3-hydroxy-2,4-dimethylpent-4-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one (93). Oxazolidinone 4 (10.0 g, 43.1 mmol) was treated with MgCl₂(0.20 g, 2.2 mmol), NaSbF₆(1.7 g, 6.5 mmol), Et₃N (6.03 mL, 86.2 mmol), methacrolein (2.67 mL, 25.9 mmol) and TMSCl (3.92 mL, 32.3 mmol) in EtOAc (50 mL) and allowed to stir under Ar at rt for 24 h. The yellow-green slurry was filtered through a plug of silica gel with Et₂O (1 L). GC analysis of the solution gave the isomeric composition of the TMS ether in a 16:1 ratio with its diastereomers. The ether was concentrated in vacuo, and MeOH (86 mL) and TFA (1 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min and concentrated to give a yellow which was purified by flash chromatography (10% acetone in hexanes) to yield 5.02 g of alcohol 93 (78% 2 steps). Data matches known literature.³²[Î±]²⁰_D=+0.06 (c 0.1, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.39-7.31 (m, 5H), 5.08 (s, 1H), 5.02 (s, 1H), 4.77-4.75 (m, 1H), 4.27-4.22 (m, 4H), 3.35 (dd, J=13.5, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (dd, J=13.5, 9.5 Hz, 1H), 2.75 (br s, 1H), 1.86 s (3H), 1.19 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 175.6, 152.9, 145.0, 135.7, 129.3, 128.9, 127.1, 114.5, 80.1, 65.6, 55.5, 41.9, 38.4, 16.1, 14.7; IR (thin film) 3300, 3057, 2931, 2857, 1781, 1702, 1422, 1384, 1271, 1209, 1079 cm^âˆ’1; HRMS (EI) cald for C₁₇H₂₁NO₄303.1582, found 303.1581.

[4R,2S,3R]-4-Benzyl-3-[3-(tert-butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethylpent-4-enoyl]oxazolidin-2-one. To a stirred solution of alcohol 93 (20.24 g, 66.72 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(170 mL) at 0Â° C. under argon was added 2,6-lutidine (9.3 mL, 79.85 mmol) and TBSOTf (16.1 mL, 73.4 mmol). After 3 h at 0Â° C. the reaction mixture was quenched with MeOH (34 mL) then concentrated to dryness. The residue was taken up in Et₂O (225 mL) and washed with a saturated solution of NH₄Cl (2Ã—50 mL). The aqueous layers were combined and extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—20 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄and concentrated in vacuo. Flash chromatography of the crude mixture (10% to 20% EtOAc in hexanes) gave 26.5 g (95%) of the silyl ether as a clear oil: [Î±]²⁰_D=+0.07 (c 0.15, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.40-7.29 (m, 5H), 5.00 (s, 1H), 4.98 (s, 1H), 4.72 (dq, J=7.0, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J=9.6 Hz, 1H), 4.21-4.18 (m 3H), 3.49 (dd, J=13.3, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.64 (dd, J=13.3, 10.2 Hz, 1H), 1.80 (s, 3H), 1.03 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.9 (s, 9H), 0.11 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 175.9, 153.1, 145.0, 135.7, 129.3, 128.9, 127.2, 114.6, 79.4, 65.8, 55.5, 41.9, 38.4, 25.8, 18.1, 16.1, 14.7, âˆ’4.7, âˆ’5.1; IR (thin film) 3047, 2938, 2854, 1779, 1702, 1429, 1380, 1271, 1210, 1082 cm^âˆ’1; LRMS (EI) 417, 402, 360, 290, 234, 185, 117; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₃H₃₅NO₄Si 417.2335, found 417.2345.

[4S,2S,3R]-4-Benzyl-3-[3-(tert-butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-5-hydroxy-2,4-dimethylpentanoyl]oxazolidin-2-one (94). A stirred solution of 9-BBN in THF (29 mL, 0.5 M) was treated with the alkene (5.0 g, 11.97 mmol) in THF (29 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 24 h, then treated sequentially with 1:1 EtOH-THF (29 mL), pH 7 buffer (29 mL) and 30% aq. H₂O₂(14.5 mL) and stirred for 12 h at rt. The mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (3Ã—20 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with H₂O (15 mL) and saturated aqueous NaCl (15 mL) then dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the mixture by flash chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexanes) gave 94 as a clear oil (3.91 g, 75%): [Î±]²⁰_D=+0.24 (c 0.05, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.33-7.23 (m, 5H), 4.69-4.60 (m, 1H), 4.21 (dd, J=6.8, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.17-4.04 (m, 3H), 3.77-3.60 (m 2H), 3.44 (dd, J=13.1, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (dd, J=13.1, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (br s, 1H), 2.02-1.85 (m, 1H), 1.23 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.9 (s, 9H), 0.14 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 174.7, 153.1, 135.4, 129.3, 129.0, 127.3, 66.1, 65.4, 55.8, 43.9, 38.3, 37.0, 26.7, 26.0, 18.2, 16.4, 12.4, âˆ’4.2, âˆ’4.8; IR (thin film) 3538, 2927, 1780, 1700, 1273, 1201 cm^âˆ’1; HRMS (EI) cald for C₂₃H₃₇NO₅Si 435.2461, found 435.2460.

(4S)-[2R,3R,4R]-Benzyl-3-[3,5-bis(tert-butyldi methylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethylpentanoyl]oxazolidin-2-one. To a stirred solution of alcohol 94 (2.6 g, 5.97 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(15 mL) at ⁰Â° C. under argon was added 2,6-lutidine (0.83 mL, 7:14 mmol) and TBSOTf (1.44 mL, 6.57 mmol). After 3 h at 0Â° C. the reaction mixture was quenched with MeOH (3 mL) then concentrated to dryness. The residue was taken up in Et₂O (20 mL) and washed with a saturated solution of NH₄Cl (2Ã—5 mL). The aqueous layers were combined and extracted with Et₂O (2Ã—5 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄and concentrated in vacuo. Flash chromatography of the crude mixture (10% to 20% EtOAc in hexanes) gave 3.01 g (95%) of the silyl ether as a clear oil: [Î±]²⁰_D=+0.24(c 0.05, HCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.33-7.22 (m, 5H), 4.69-4.61 (m, 1H), 4.24 (dd, J=3.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.13-4.11 (m, 3H), 3.76 (dd, J=6.0, 10.3 Hz, 1H), 3.48-3.42 (m, 2H), 2.60 (dd, J=10.3, 13.1 Hz, 1H), 2.01-1.87 (m, 1H), 1.17 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.976 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.90 (s, 9H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 0.11 (s, 3H), 0.08 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 175.5, 153.1, 135.7, 129.3, 129.0, 127.3, 74.4, 66.0, 64.9, 55.7, 43.2, 39.9, 38.5, 26.1, 26.0, 18.3, 14.4, 13.5, âˆ’4.0, âˆ’4.6, âˆ’5.4 (2C); IR (thin film) 3057, 2952, 2860, 1781, 1699, 1382, 1259, 1100 cm^âˆ’1; LRMS (EI) 492 (Mâˆ’C₄H₉), 377, 374, 199, 177, 115; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₂₅H₄₂NO₅Si₂492.3306, found 492.3301.

[2R,3R,4R]-3,5-bis(tert-Butyldi methylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethylpentan-1-ol (95). To a stirred solution of silyl ether (5 g, 9.09 mmol) in THF (50 mL) at 0Â° C. were added MeOH (1.14 mL, 27.3 mmol) and LiBH₄in THF (14 mL, 2M) under argon. The solution was stirred at 0Â° C. for 30 min and then quenched by the addition of a saturated solution of Rochelle salt in H₂O (60 mL) and stirred for 10 min at 0Â° C. The mixture was poured into CH₂Cl₂(100 mL) and stirred vigorously until 2 layers appeared (2 h). The aqueous layer was separated extracted with of CH₂Cl₂(40 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (40 mL), dried (MgSO₄), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. Flash chromatography (30% EtOAc in hexanes) gave 2.32 g (65%) of alcohol 95 as a colorless oil: [Î±]²⁰_D=+10.0 (c 1.2, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 3.67 (t, J=5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.55-3.50 (m, 3H), 3.39 (dd, J=10.0, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (br s, 1H), 1.87-1.77 (m, 2H), 0.92 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.83 (s, 9H), 0.81 (s, 9H), 0.03 (s, 3H), 0.01 (s, 3H), âˆ’0.03 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 800.2, 66.0, 65.2, 39.7, 38.8, 25.9, 25.6, 18.3, 18.0, 14.9, 14.7, âˆ’5.4, âˆ’5.3, âˆ’4.1; IR (thin film) 3330, 2930, 2858, 1471, 1250, 1023 cm^âˆ’1; HRMS (EI) calcd for C₁₉H₄₄O₃Si₂376.2859, found 376.2858.

[2R,3R,4R]-3,5-bis-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-2,4-dimethylpentanal (96). Following the procedure for 4-(tert-butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-butyraldehyde 89, 96 can be prepared in a similar manner.

(2R)-3-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-2-methylpropionic acid methyl ester. A solution of alcohol (10.0 g, 84.6 mmol), imidazole (9.2 g, 133.9 mmol), and TBSCl (19.1 g, 126.9 mmol) in DMF (150 mL) was stirred overnight at room temperature under argon. A mixture of H₂O (500 mL) and EtOAc (300 mL) was added and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (2Ã—200 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2Ã—200 mL), brine (200 mL), dried over MgSO₄, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The crude oil was purified by flash chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexanes) to yield 17.7 g (90%) of the silyl ether as a clear yellow oil: The spectral data matched that of the known compound. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 3.62 (dd, J=6.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (dd, J=6.7, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (m, 3), 2.48 (sext, J=7.0 Hz, 1H), 0.97 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.71 (s, 9H), âˆ’0.1 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 175.4, 65.2, 51.5, 42.5, 25.7, 18.2, 13.4, âˆ’5.5.

[2R]-3-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-2-methylpropan-1-ol. To a stirred solution of silyl ether (5.0 g, 21.5 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(125 mL) at âˆ’40Â° C. under argon was added slowly over 1.5 h via cannula DibalH in toluene (100 mL, 1M). After 30 min at âˆ’40Â° C., the reaction mixture was quenched by slow addition of MeOH (15 mL) and warmed to RT. The reaction mixture was poured into a vigorously stirred solution of saturated Rochelle salt (200 mL) and EtOAc (300 mL) and stirred overnight. The aqueous layer was separated and extracted with EtOAc (3Ã—50 mL), dried (MgSO₄) and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (20% EtOAc in hexanes) to produce 3.46 g (79%) of the alcohol, a clear liquid. The spectral data matched that of the known compound: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 3.73 (dd, J=4.5, 9.8, Hz, 1H), 3.57 (m, 3H), 2.80 (br s, 1H), 1.99-1.86 (m, 1H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.82 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.06 (d, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 68.8, 68.4, 37.0, 25.8, 18.1, 13.0, âˆ’5.6.

[2R]-3-(tert-Butyidimethylsilanyloxy)-2-methyl propionaldehyde (ent-17). DMSO (3.0 mL, 42.6 mmol) was added, dropwise, to a stirred solution of oxalyl chloride (1.5 mL, 19.9 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(80 mL) at âˆ’78Â° C. under argon. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 min then a solution of alcohol (3.0 g, 14.7 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂(25 mL) was added dropwise. After 1 h at âˆ’78Â° C., Et₃N (10.5 mL, 74.7 mmol) was added slowly via syringe, the mixture was stirred for 5 min then warmed to room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH₂Cl₂(25 mL), washed with ice cold 0.5 M HCl (50 mL) then H₂O (30 mL) and the layers were separated. The aqueous layers were combined and extracted with CH₂Cl₂(2Ã—30 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The intermediate aldehyde ent-17 was used in the following reaction without purification: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 9.75 (6, 1.5HÎ¶, 1H), 3.86-3.82 (m, 2H), 2.53-2.50 (m, 1H), 1.10 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.88 (s, 9H), 0.05 (s, 6H).

[3S,4S,5S]-2,4-dimethyl-1-[(tert-butyidimethylsilyl)oxy]-hexene-5-en-3-ol (97). A solution of (R,R)-diisopropyl tartrate (E)-crotylboronate (22.1 mmol) was added to 4 â„« powdered molecular sieves (0.025 g) in toluene (1 mL) under argon and the mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature. The mixture was cooled to âˆ’78Â° C. and a solution of the aldehyde ent-17 (3.0 g, 14.7 mmol) in toluene (8 mL) was added dropwise via syringe. The resulting mixture was maintained at âˆ’78Â° C. for 3 h and then treated with NaBH₄(0.106 g, 2.6 mmol) in EtOH (4 mL) and warmed to 0Â° C. The reaction mixture was treated with 1N NaOH (40 mL) and stirred vigorously for 30 min, followed by separation of the organic layer. The aqueous layer was extracted with CH₂Cl₂(5Ã—80 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO₄, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude oil was purified by flash chromatography (5% to 25% Et₂O in hexanes) providing 2.87 g (65%) of 97, a clear, yellow tinted oil: ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 5.91 (ddd, J=8.8, 12.0, 15.8 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (dd, J=1.8, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (dd, J=1.8, 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (s, 1H), 3.73 (dd, J=4.2, 9.8 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (dd, J=8.2, 9.8 Hz 1H), 3.37 (dd, J=3.0, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.39-2.29 (m, 1H), 1.83-1.70 (m, 1H), 1.09 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.89 (s, 9H), 0.81 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.06 (s, 6H); ³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 139.9, 114.9, 80.2, 68.7, 41.2, 37.5, 25.8 [2C], 18.1, 17.7, 13.4, âˆ’5.6, âˆ’5.7.

[2S,3S,4S]-tert-Butyl-[3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2,4-dimethylhex-5-enyloxy]dimethylsilane. A mixture of NaH (2.9 g, 11.6 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was cooled to 0Â° C. then DMF (5 mL), alcohol 97 (1.0 g, 3.87 mmol) in THF (5 mL), and PMBBr (1.8 g, 9.7 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 48 h. The resulting mixture was poured into a pH 7 phosphate buffer and diluted with ether (90 mL). The organic layer was separated and washed with pH 7 buffer (3Ã—60 mL), dried over K₂CO₃, filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude yellow oil was purified by flash chromatography (5% to 10% EtOAc in hexanes) providing 1.39 g (75%) of the PMB ether as a clear, yellow tinted oil: [Î±]²⁰_D=+0.06 (c 1.3, CHCl₃); ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 7.31 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.90 (d, J=8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.93 (ddd, J=15.6, 12.0, 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J=12 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d, J=15.61H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.29 (dd, J=4.6, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 2.51-2.49 (m, 1H), 1.91-1.86 (m, 1H), 1.01 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.08 (s, 6H); ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) Î´ 158.9, 142.1, 131.2, 129.2, 114.0, 113.6, 82.8, 74.1, 65.7, 55.7, 38.4, 37.3, 25.9, 18.2, 15.6, 11.2, âˆ’5.2; IR (thin film) 3057, 2957, 2857, 1612, 1513, 1246, 1085 cm^âˆ’1; LRMS (EI) 323 (Mâˆ’C₄H₇), 321, 271, 255, 186, 122 m/z.

[2S,3S,4S]-5-(tert-Butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-3-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2,4-dimethyl pentanal (98). Following the procedure for [2R,3R,5R]-6-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilanyloxy)-3,5-bis-(4-methoxybenzyloxy)-2-methylhexanal, 98 can be prepared in a similar manner.

(R,R)-Diisopropyl tartrate (E)-crotylboronate. An oven-dried 1 L three-neck round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a âˆ’100Â° C. thermometer was charged with 206 mL of anhydrous THF and KOtBu (28.2 g, 250 mmol). This mixture was flushed with Ar and cooled to âˆ’78Â° C., then trans-2-butene (23 mL, 250 mmol), condensed from a gas lecture bottle into a rubber-stoppered round bottom flask immersed in a âˆ’78Â° C. dry ice-acetone bath, was poured into the reaction mixture. n-BuLi (100 mL, 2.5 M in hexane) was then added dropwise via cannula over 1.5 h. After completion of the addition, the cooling bath was removed and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to an internal temperature of âˆ’50Â° C. for 15 min then immediately recooled to âˆ’78Â° C. Triisopropylborate (57.8 mL, 250 mmol) was added drop-wise via cannula to the (E)-crotylpotassium solution over 2 h. After addition, the reaction mixture was maintained at âˆ’78Â° C. for 30 min and then rapidly poured into a 2L separatory funnel containing 470 mL of 1 N HCl saturated with NaCl. The aqueous layer was adjusted to pH 1 by using 1 N HCl (100-150 mL), and then a solution of (R,R)-diisopropyl tartrate (52.8 g, 250 mmol) in 88 mL of Et₂O was added. The phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with additional Et₂O (4Ã—120 mL). The combined extracts were dried over MgSO₄for 1 h then vacuum filtered through a fritted glass funnel under Ar blanket into an oven-dried round-bottom flask. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo, and pumped to constant weight at under vacuum. Anhydrous toluene (170 mL) was added to the flask make a 1M solution.

Biology

General. Tubulin without microtubule-associated proteins was prepared from fresh bovine brains[32] The normoisotopic and tritiated forms of paclitaxel and normoisotopic docetaxel were provided by the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch, National Cancer Institute. (+)-Discodermolide was from Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation. Ca²⁺- and Mg²⁺-free RPMI-1640 culture medium were from GIBCO/BRL-Life Technologies. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from Hyclone. Cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.).

Tubulin Polymerization[32] Tubulin assembly was followed in a Beckman-Coulter 7400 spectrophotometer, equipped with an electronic Peltier temperature controller, reading absorbance (turbidity) at 350 nm. Reaction mixtures (0.25 mL final volume) contained tubulin (final concentration 10 Î¼M; 1 mg/mL), monosodium glutamate (0.8 M from a stock solution adjusted to pH 6.6 with HCl), DMSO (final volume 4% v/v), and differing concentrations of test agent where indicated. Reaction mixtures without test agent were cooled to 0Â° C. and added to cuvettes held at 0.25-0.5Â° C. in the spectrophotometer. Test agent in DMSO was then rapidly mixed in the reaction mixture. Each run contained one positive control (paclitaxel, 10 Î¼M final concentration) and one negative control (DMSO only). Baselines were established at 0.25-2.5Â° C. and temperature was rapidly raised to 30Â° C. (in approximately 1 min) and held there for 20 min. The temperature was then rapidly lowered back to 0.25-2.5Â° C.

Cell Growth Inhibition[34] Cells were plated (500-2000 cells/well depending on the cell line) in 96-well microplates, allowed to attach and grow for 48 h, then treated with vehicle (4% DMSO, a concentration that allowed doubling times of 24 h or less) or test agent (50, 10, 2, 0.4 and 0.08 Î¼M for the new agents; 0.001, 0.005, 0.010, 0.020 and 0.100 Î¼M for paclitaxel and discodermolide) for the given times. One plate consisted of cells from each line used for a time zero cell number determination. The other plates in a given determination contained eight wells of control cells, eight wells of medium and each agent concentration tested in quadruplicate. Cell numbers were obtained spectrophotometrically (absorbance at 490 nm minus that at 630 nm) in a Dynamax plate reader after treatment with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) using phenazine methanesulfonate as the electron acceptor. After initial screening with the above 5-fold dilutions, fifty percent growth inhibitory concentration (GI₅₀) values were determined for each agent by repeating the screen using 2-fold dilutions (five concentrations) centered on the initial estimated GI₅₀concentration, again in quadruplicate.

Paclitaxel binding site inhibition assay. [34] A stock solution of [³H]paclitaxel (26.8 Î¼M, 16.2 Ci/mmol), obtained from the NCI, was prepared in 37% (v/v) DMSO. The test agents were prepared in 25% (v/v) DMSO-0.75 M monosodium glutamate (prepared from a 2M stock solution adjusted to pH 6.6 with HCl). The radiolabeled paclitaxel and test agents, as indicated in terms of final concentrations, were mixed in equal volumes and warmed to 37Â° C. A reaction mixture (50 Î¼L) containing 0.75 M monosodium glutamate, 4.0 Î¼M tubulin, and 40 Î¼M ddGTP (a non-hydrolyzable analog of GTP) was prepared and incubated at 37Â° C. for 30 min to preform microtubules. An equivalent volume of drug mixture with [³H]paclitaxel was added to preformed polymer and incubated for 30 min at 37Â° C. Bound [³H]paclitaxel was separated from free drug by centrifugation of the reaction mixtures at 14000 rpm for 20 min at room temperature. Non-specific binding was determined by addition of a 12-fold excess of docetaxel. Radioactive counts from the supernatant (50 Î¼L) were determined by scintillation spectrometry. Bound [³H]paclitaxel was calculated from the following: total paclitaxel added to each reaction mixture minus the paclitaxel present in the supernatant (free drug). The % bound values were normalized to the control values with no inhibitor added.

The foregoing description and accompanying drawings set forth the preferred embodiments of the invention at the present time. Various modifications, additions and alternative designs will, of course, become apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing teachings without departing from the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is indicated by the following claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes and variations that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.