Back to All Articles
Browse articles with tag: Section 101
You must be logged in to create a new article
All Articles
Knobbe Martens
Jun 27, 2024
Relying on Computer-Implemented, Result-Focused Functional Language Is a Bad Bet
Written by: Matthew S. Whitehead & Jacob R. Rosenbaum BETEIRO, LLC v. DRAFTKINGS INC Before Dyk, Prost, and Stark.  Appeal from... Read More
Knobbe Martens
Jan 30, 2024
•
PTAB Litigation
Current Congressional Attempts at Patent Reform
Written by: Philip M. Nelson In recent years, Congress has considered potential new laws for patent reform, typically changes to the... Read More
Knobbe Martens
Jul 18, 2023
•
Featured
Performing Claimed Features Faster Than Humans by Using Generic Computers Is Not Sufficient as an Improvement to Computer Technology
Written by: Hyunjin (Harry) Park & Kendall Loebbaka Trinity Info Media, L.L.C. v. Covalent INC. Before STOLL, BRYSON, and CUNNINGHAM.  Appeal... Read More
Knobbe Martens
Dec 21, 2022
•
Featured
Claim Directed to Specific, Hardware-Based Data Structure That Enables Technological Improvement Is Eligible Under § 101
Written by: Mary Bao & Nathan D. Reeves ADASA INC. v. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION Before Moore, Hughes and Stark.  Appeal from... Read More
Knobbe Martens
May 18, 2020
•
Featured
Claims Directed at Longstanding Commercial Practices Do Not Pass Step One of the § 101 Test
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SHOPPERSCHOICE.COM, LLC Before Prost, Dyk, and Wallach.  Appeal from the United States District Court for... Read More
Knobbe Martens
May 5, 2020
An Invention That Changes the Normal Operation of a System Is Not Abstract Under § 101
UNILOC USA, INC. v. LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. Before Moore, Reyna, and Taranto.  On appeal from the District Court for... Read More