Last week over 50 new early stage patent caes were filed in US disctrict courts:

1. Martin Gardner Reiffin v. William H. Gates, III et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-03505 filed on 7/18/2011 in Northern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Martin Gardner Reiffin
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Martin G. Reiffin - Pro Se
Defendant(s): William H. Gates, III; Steven A. Ballmer; Microsoft
Patent(s): 5694603 - Computer memory product with preemptive multithreading software

2. PetEdge, Inc. v. LTD Commodities Holdings, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-11255 filed on 7/18/2011 in District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff(s): PetEdge, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): McCarter & English, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Erik Paul Belt; Bonnie A. Vanzler
Defendant(s): LTD Commodities Holdings, Inc.
Patent(s): 7621236 - Folding pet ramp and steps

3. Ogma LLC v. Casio America et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00322 filed on 7/18/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): Casio America; Casio Computer
Defendant law firm(s): Hardy & Atherton
Defendant lawyer(s): Randall Jay Cook; John C. Hardy
Patent(s): 5825427 - Image display system

4. Sorna Corporation, Inc. v. Nautilus Medical
Case: 0:11-cv-01953 filed on 7/18/2011 in District of Minnesota
Plaintiff(s): Sorna Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): F S Farrell, LLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Alexander Farrell; Frank S. Farrell
Defendant(s): Nautilus Medical
Patent(s): 7965408

5. Ogma LLC v. Jakks Pacific
Case: 2:11-cv-00324 filed on 7/18/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): Jakks Pacific
Defendant law firm(s): Gillam & Smith, LLP
Defendant lawyer(s): Melissa Richards Smith
Patent(s): 6150947 - Programmable motion-sensitive sound effects device

6. Athenahealth, Inc. v. AdvancedMD Software, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-11260 filed on 7/18/2011 in District of Massachusetts
Plaintiff(s): Athenahealth, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Chelsea A. Loughran; Michael N. Rader
Defendant(s): AdvancedMD Software, Inc.
Patent(s): 7,720,701 - Automated configuration of medical practice management systems
                 7,617,116 - Practice management and billing automation system

7. Sorna Corporation, Inc. v. Dicom Solutions, Inc.
Case: 0:11-cv-01954 filed on 7/18/2011 in District of Minnesota
Plaintiff(s): Sorna Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): F S Farrell, LLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Alexander Farrell; Frank S. Farrell
Defendant(s): Dicom Solutions, Inc.
Patent(s): 7965408

8. Ogma LLC v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00323 filed on 7/18/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et. al.
Defendant law firm(s): Yarbrough
Defendant lawyer(s): Melvin R. Wilcox
Patent(s): 5825427 - Image display system

9. Sorna Corporation, Inc. v. SST Group, Inc.
Case: 0:11-cv-01952 filed on 7/18/2011 in District of Minnesota
Plaintiff(s): Sorna Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): F S Farrell, LLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Alexander Farrell; Frank S. Farrell
Defendant(s): SST Group, Inc.
Patent(s): 7965408

10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. et. al. v. Tolmar Inc
Case: 3:11-cv-01714 filed on 7/18/2011 in Northern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Galderma Laboratories, L.P. et. al.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Munck Carter LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jamil N. Alibhai; Michael C. Wilson
Defendant(s): Tolmar Inc
Patent(s): 6,881,726 - Aqueous compositions containing metronidazole
                 7,981,916
                 7,348,317 - Aqueous compositions containing metronidazole

11. Encap LLC v. OMS Investments et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00685 filed on 7/18/2011 in Eastern District of Wisconsin
Plaintiff(s): Encap LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Liebmann Conway Olejniczak & Jerry SC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Thomas Wickham Schmidt
Defendant(s): OMS Investments; Scotts Company; Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
Patent(s): 6,209,259 - Seeding treatments
                 6,745,513 - Agglomerated mulch carrier
                 7,412,878 - Watering indicator

12. The New York Times Company v. Webvention Holdings LLC et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00634 filed on 7/18/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): The New York Times Company
Plaintiff law firm(s): Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jack B. Blumenfeld; Maryellen Noreika
Defendant(s): Webvention Holdings LLC et. al.
Patent(s): 5251294 - Accessing, assembling, and using bodies of information

13. Gold Medal Products Co. v. C. Cretors & Company
Case: 2:11-cv-00144 filed on 7/18/2011 in Eastern District of Kentucky
Plaintiff(s): Gold Medal Products Co.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Wood, Herron & Evans, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Brett Allen Schatz
Defendant(s): C. Cretors & Company
Patent(s): 7874244

14. Catalyst Assets LLC v. Life Technologies Corporation
Case: 3:11-cv-03537 filed on 7/19/2011 in Northern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Catalyst Assets LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law; Pierce Atwood
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David Adam Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; James Carl Otteson; Margaret Minister O'Keefe; Robert H. Stier
Defendant(s): Life Technologies Corporation
Patent(s): 5858731 - Oligonucleotide libraries useful for producing primers

15. Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
Case: 5:11-cv-13106 filed on 7/19/2011 in Eastern District of Michigan
Plaintiff(s): Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Mantese and Rossman, PC; Mantese Assoc.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Brendan H. Frey; Gerard V. Mantese; Ian M. Williamson
Defendant(s): AT&T Mobility, LLC
Patent(s): 5,724,092 - Videophone interactive mailbox facility system and method of processing information
                 5,606,361 - Videophone interactive mailbox facility system and method of processing information

16. Robert J Koch et. al. v. Bayer Cropscience Lp, et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00572 filed on 7/19/2011 in Middle District of North Carolina
Plaintiff(s): Robert J Koch; Cloverleaf Golf Course, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Simmons And Browder, LLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Sarah S. Burns; Paul A. Lesko; Jo Anna Pollock
Defendant(s): Bayer Cropscience Lp, et. al.
Defendant law firm(s): Milbank Tweed Hadley & Mccloy, Llp; Lathrop & Gage, Llp
Defendant lawyer(s): Robert J. Koch; Edward J. Mayle; John D. Ryan
Patent(s): 3,912,752
                 5,176,736 - Delivery system for agricultural chemicals
                 5,250,499 - Delivery system for agricultural chemicals
                 5,071,463 - Delivery system for agricultural chemicals
                 4,742,060 - Heterocyclic compounds
                 5,160,528 - Delivery system for agricultural chemicals
                 4,213,988 - Insecticidal 1,5-bis(.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.-trifluoro-p-tolyl)-1,4-pentadien-3-one (1,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2-pyrimidinyl)hydrazones
                 5,156,666 - Delivery system for agricultural chemicals

17. Richard A. Williamson v. AT&T Services et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-04948 filed on 7/19/2011 in Southern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Richard A. Williamson
Plaintiff law firm(s): Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Chad Johnson; Joshua Lee Raskin
Defendant(s): AT&T Services; AT&T; Verizon New York; Verizon Corporate Resources Group; Verizon Communications; AT&T Operations; Verizon Services
Patent(s): 6,370,571 - System and method for delivering high-performance online multimedia services
                 7,225,275 - System and method for delivering high-performance online multimedia services
                 7,873,749
                 7,529,856 - Delivering multimedia services

18. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Nycomed U.S., Inc
Case: 1:11-cv-04962 filed on 7/19/2011 in Southern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Andrew M. Berdon; Robert Bradley Wilson
Defendant(s): Nycomed U.S., Inc
Patent(s): 7981909

19. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Perrigo Company, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-04963 filed on 7/19/2011 in Southern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Andrew M. Berdon; Robert Bradley Wilson
Defendant(s): Perrigo Company, Inc.
Patent(s): 7981909

20. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Taro Pharmaceutical Industries et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-04965 filed on 7/19/2011 in Southern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Andrew M. Berdon; Robert Bradley Wilson
Defendant(s): Taro Pharmaceutical Industries; Taro Pharmaceuticals
Patent(s): 7981909

21. Rmail et. al. v. Echosign et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00325 filed on 7/19/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Rmail; RPost Holdings; RPost Communications
Plaintiff law firm(s): Navarro Huff, PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Winston Oliver Huff
Defendant(s): Echosign; Adobe Systems
Patent(s): 6,182,219 - Apparatus and method for authenticating the dispatch and contents of documents
                 7,966,372
                 6,571,334 - Apparatus and method for authenticating the dispatch and contents of documents
                 7,707,624 - System for, and method of, proving the transmission, receipt and content of a reply to an electronic message
                 7,865,557

22. Optical Memory Storage, LLC v. CMC Magnetics Corporation et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-13110 filed on 7/19/2011 in Eastern District of Michigan
Plaintiff(s): Optical Memory Storage, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): The Simon Law Firm PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Anthony G. Simon; Timothy E. Grochocinski
Defendant(s): CMC Magnetics Corporation; Hotan Corporation; Fujifilm Holdings Corporation; FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation; Fujifilm North America Corporation; Fujifilm Recording Media U.S.A., Inc.; Hewlett Packard Co; Imation Corporation; Moser Baer India Limited; Ritek Corporation; Advanced Media, Inc. ; Koninklijke Philips Electronics .V.; Philips Electronics North America Corporation; Panasonic Corporation; Panasonic Corporation of North America; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Patent(s): 5128099 - Congruent state changeable optical memory material and device

23. Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-02173 filed on 7/20/2011 in Northern District of Alabama
Plaintiff(s): Avocent Redmond Corp.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Sirote & Permutt Pc
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Matthew B. Reeves; J Jeffery Rich
Defendant(s): Raritan Americas, Inc.
Defendant law firm(s): Balch & Bingham Llp; Gibbons Pc
Defendant lawyer(s): Will Hill Tankersley; Erich M. Falke
Patent(s): 5,721,842 - Interconnection system for viewing and controlling remotely connected computers with on-screen video overlay for controlling of the interconnection switch
                 7,113,978 - Computer interconnection system
                 5,937,176 - Interconnection system having circuits to packetize keyboard/mouse electronic signals from plural workstations and supply to keyboard/mouse input of remote computer systems through a crosspoint switch
                 6,345,323 - Computer interconnection system
                 5,884,096 - Interconnection system for viewing and controlling remotely connected computers with on-screen video overlay for controlling of the interconnection switch
                 7,818,367 - Computer interconnection system
                 5,732,212 - System and method for remote monitoring and operation of personal computers
                 6,112,264 - Computer interconnection system having analog overlay for remote control of the interconnection switch

24. KMC Exim Corporation v. Starlight Nail Supplies, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-03499 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): KMC Exim Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Hoffmann & Baron LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Ronald J. Baron; Anthony E. Bennett
Defendant(s): Starlight Nail Supplies, Inc.
Patent(s): 6892736 - Artificial nail having application tab

25. KMC Exim Corporation v. Beauty 21 Cosmetics, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-03498 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): KMC Exim Corporation
Plaintiff law firm(s): Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Gary Abelev; Paul D. Ackerman
Defendant(s): Beauty 21 Cosmetics, Inc.
Patent(s): 6892736 - Artificial nail having application tab

26. Piao Shang Industry Co Ltd v. Best Buy Co Inc
Case: 2:11-cv-05994 filed on 7/20/2011 in Central District of California
Plaintiff(s): Piao Shang Industry Co Ltd
Plaintiff law firm(s): White Field Inc
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Steven W. Ritcheson
Defendant(s): Best Buy Co Inc
Patent(s): 5305381 - Cradle for telephone

27. Piao Shang Industry Co Ltd v. Bracketron Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-05992 filed on 7/20/2011 in Central District of California
Plaintiff(s): Piao Shang Industry Co Ltd
Plaintiff law firm(s): White Field Inc
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Steven W. Ritcheson
Defendant(s): Bracketron Inc.
Patent(s): 5305381 - Cradle for telephone

28. Accenture Global Services Ltd. et. al. v. Guidewire Software, Inc.
Case: 3:11-cv-03563 filed on 7/20/2011 in Northern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Accenture Global Services Ltd. et. al.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Amy Schofield Lemyre; Sarah Elizabeth Piepmeier
Defendant(s): Guidewire Software, Inc.
Patent(s): 7979382

29. Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case: 3:11-cv-00719 filed on 7/20/2011 in Middle District of Florida
Plaintiff(s): Parkervision, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, PA; Smith, Hulsey & Busey
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Ava K. Doppelt; Brian R. Gilchrist; James Arthur Bolling; Stephen D. Busey
Defendant(s): Qualcomm Incorporated
Patent(s): 7,496,342 - Down-converting electromagnetic signals, including controlled discharge of capacitors
                 6,266,518 - Method and system for down-converting electromagnetic signals by sampling and integrating over apertures
                 7,515,896 - Method and system for down-converting an electromagnetic signal, and transforms for same, and aperture relationships
                 7,724,845 - Method and system for down-converting and electromagnetic signal, and transforms for same
                 7,822,401

30. Cleversafe, Inc. v. Amplidata, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-04890 filed on 7/20/2011 in Northern District of Illinois
Plaintiff(s): Cleversafe, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Dykema Gossett PLLC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Kyle Alexander Davis; Timothy K. Sendek; Allan J. Sternstein
Defendant(s): Amplidata, Inc.
Patent(s): 7,953,771
                 7,574,570 - Billing system for information dispersal system
                 7,953,937
                 7,546,427 - System for rebuilding dispersed data

31. Melvino Technologies et. al. v. SOTI inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-04899 filed on 7/20/2011 in Northern District of Illinois
Plaintiff(s): Melvino Technologies; ArrivalStar S.A.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Dowell Baker
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Anthony E. Dowell; Geoffrey David Smith
Defendant(s): SOTI inc.
Patent(s): 6741927 - User-definable communications methods and systems

32. TechnoLines, LP v. GST AutoLeather, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-13146 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of Michigan
Plaintiff(s): TechnoLines, LP
Plaintiff law firm(s): Butzel Long
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Bruce L. Sendek
Defendant(s): GST AutoLeather, Inc.
Patent(s): 5,990,444 - Laser method and system of scribing graphics
                 6,731,212 - Tag device
                 6,252,196 - Laser method of scribing graphics
                 6,140,602 - Marking of fabrics and other materials using a laser
                 6,664,505

33. Callpod, Inc. v. GN Netcom A/S et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00326 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Callpod, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Gillam & Smith, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Melissa Richards Smith
Defendant(s): GN Netcom A/S; Hello Direct; T Technology; GN Netcom
Patent(s): 7707250 - Wireless communications connection device

34. Personal Audio, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Case: 9:11-cv-00120 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Personal Audio, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Germer Gertz, L.L.P.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Charles W. Goehringer
Defendant(s): Apple, Inc.
Patent(s): 6199076 - Audio program player including a dynamic program selection controller

35. Internet Communications Solutions LLC v. Tiger Jet Networks et. al.
Case: 6:11-cv-00375 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Internet Communications Solutions LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Ward & Smith Law Firm
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Jack Wesley Hill; Thomas John Ward
Defendant(s): Tiger Jet Networks; YMax; Vocaltec Communications; YMax Communications; magicJack; MagicJack Vocaltec
Patent(s): 7924825

36. Sellerbid, Inc. v. Opentable et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00768 filed on 7/20/2011 in Eastern District of Virginia
Plaintiff(s): Sellerbid, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Law Office of Craig C. Reilly
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Craig Crandall Reilly
Defendant(s): Opentable; Groupon; Hungry Machine; Buywithme
Patent(s): 7,647,024 - Method and system for improving client server transmission over fading channel with wireless location and authentication technology via electromagnetic radiation
                 7,983,616

37. Milwaukee Electric Tool et. al. v. Audiovox Accessories et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-00517 filed on 7/20/2011 in Western District of Wisconsin
Plaintiff(s): Milwaukee Electric Tool; Techtronic Industries Company; One World Technologies; A&M Industries; Techtronic Power Tools Technology
Plaintiff law firm(s): Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): J Donald Best; Matthew D. Brown; Melanie J. Reichenberger
Defendant(s): Audiovox Accessories; Batteries.com; Audiovox; Fine Dragon Technology; Technuity
Patent(s): D494,130 - Battery
                 D504,394 - Battery pack
                 D539,221 - Battery
                 D558,670 - Battery
                 D564,444 - Battery
                 D579,868 - Battery
                 D580,353 - Battery
                 D593,944 - Battery

38. Oakley, Inc. v. Mountain View Marketing
Case: 3:11-cv-01607 filed on 7/21/2011 in Southern District of California
Plaintiff(s): Oakley, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Ali S. Razai
Defendant(s): Mountain View Marketing
Patent(s): 5,387,949 - Eyeglass connection device
                 D616919 - Eyeglass front
                 5,638,145 - Vented eyeglass lens
                 D543572 - Eyeglass
                 D581450 - Eyeglass

39. William D. Fondriest v. Chippewa Aerospace et. al.
Case: 6:11-cv-01206 filed on 7/21/2011 in Middle District of Florida
Plaintiff(s): William D. Fondriest
Plaintiff law firm(s): Cohen, Foster & Romine, PA; D. Keith Thomas, PA
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Barry A. Cohen; D Keith Thomas
Defendant(s): Chippewa Aerospace; Icore International
Patent(s): 7135790 - Modular electrical harness for jet aircraft landing gear systems

40. Hawaii Airboards, LLC v. Surf Technicians, LLC
Case: 1:11-cv-00453 filed on 7/21/2011 in District of Hawaii
Plaintiff(s): Hawaii Airboards, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Moseley Biehl Tsugawa Lau & Muzzi
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Tedson H. Koja; Alan K. Lau
Defendant(s): Surf Technicians, LLC
Patent(s): 6066016 - Inflatable transportable water craft for survival or recreational applications

41. Abbott Laboratories v. Hospira Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-00648 filed on 7/21/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Abbott Laboratories
Plaintiff law firm(s): Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Mary B. Graham; Erich William Struble
Defendant(s): Hospira Inc.
Patent(s): 6,136,799 - Cosolvent formulations
                 6,361,758 - Cosolvent formulations

42. Buyerleverage Email Solutions LLC v. Knology et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00645 filed on 7/21/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Buyerleverage Email Solutions LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Pazuniak Law Office
Plaintiff lawyer(s): George Pazuniak
Defendant(s): Knology; Comcast; Yahoo; AT; Microsoft; Time Warner Cable; Surewest Communications
Patent(s): 7,636,756 - System and method for granting deposit-contingent e-mailing rights
                 7,072,943 - System and method for granting deposit-contingent E-mailing rights
                 7,379,972 - System and method for granting deposit-contingent e-mailing rights
                 7,725,546 - System and method for granting deposit-contingent e-mailing rights
                 7,962,561

43. Pull'R Holding Company, LLC v. Custom Leathercraft Mfg. Co., Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-04939 filed on 7/21/2011 in Northern District of Illinois
Plaintiff(s): Pull'R Holding Company, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Grossman Law Office
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Lee F. Grossman; Mark M. Grossman
Defendant(s): Custom Leathercraft Mfg. Co., Inc.
Patent(s): D438701 - Tool pouch

44. Goldblatt Industries, LLC v. Menard, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-02405 filed on 7/21/2011 in District of Kansas
Plaintiff(s): Goldblatt Industries, LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Lathrop & Gage LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Robert J. Lambrechts
Defendant(s): Menard, Inc.
Patent(s): D545659 - Handle portion
                 D545659 - Handle portion
                 D506658 - Handle

45. Fournier Industries, Inc. v. Prime Solution, Inc.
Case: 1:11-cv-00747 filed on 7/21/2011 in Western District of Michigan
Plaintiff(s): Fournier Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Novak Druce & Quigg, LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Joseph W. Bain
Defendant(s): Prime Solution, Inc.
Defendant law firm(s): Carlton Fields, PA; Price Heneveld Cooper Dewitt & Litton
Defendant lawyer(s): Nancy J. Faggianelli; Steven L. Underwood
Patent(s): 7895943

46. Lavagear Inc. v. CVS Pharmacy et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-03508 filed on 7/21/2011 in Eastern District of New York
Plaintiff(s): Lavagear Inc.
Plaintiff law firm(s): Cittone & Lindenbaum LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Henry Joseph Cittone
Defendant(s): CVS Pharmacy; Mediheat; Rite Aid; Walgreens; Heatmax
Patent(s): 6598235 - Garment, undergarment or garment liner accommodating a heating device

47. Ogma LLC v. Optoma Technology, Inc.
Case: 2:11-cv-00327 filed on 7/21/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): Optoma Technology, Inc.
Defendant law firm(s): Wilson Robertson & Cornelius PC; Bingham McCutchen LLP
Defendant lawyer(s): Jennifer Parker Ainsworth; John A. Polito
Patent(s): 5825427 - Image display system

48. Ogma LLC v. 3M Company
Case: 2:11-cv-00328 filed on 7/21/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): 3M Company
Defendant law firm(s): Greenberg Traurig
Defendant lawyer(s): Mary-Olga Lovett; Kimberly A. Warshawsky
Patent(s): 5825427 - Image display system

49. Samsung Semiconductor et. al. v. Keranos et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00331 filed on 7/21/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Samsung Semiconductor; Samsung Semiconductor
Plaintiff law firm(s): Steptoe & Johnson; King & Spalding LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): John M. Caracappa; Brian Christopher Banner; Truman Haymaker Fenton; Jeffrey David Mills
Defendant(s): Keranos; United Module
Defendant law firm(s): Agility IP Law
Defendant lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Monica Mucchetti Eno; Xiang Long; Theresa Elise Norton
Patent(s): 5,042,009 - Method for programming a floating gate memory device
                 4,795,719 - Self-aligned split gate eprom process
                 4,868,629 - Self-aligned split gate EPROM

50. Ogma LLC v. Bensussen Deutsch & Associates Inc
Case: 2:11-cv-00335 filed on 7/21/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Ogma LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Agility IP Law LLP; Spangler Law PC
Plaintiff lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Xiang Long; James C. Otteson; Andrew W. Spangler
Defendant(s): Bensussen Deutsch & Associates Inc
Defendant law firm(s): Gillam & Smith, LLP
Defendant lawyer(s): Melissa Richards Smith
Patent(s): 6150947 - Programmable motion-sensitive sound effects device

51. Zachary W. Lyon v. Cosmos Marketing et. al.
Case: 3:11-cv-00354 filed on 7/22/2011 in Western District of North Carolina
Plaintiff(s): Zachary W. Lyon
Plaintiff law firm(s): Ashley Law Firm P.C.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Stephen S. Ashley
Defendant(s): Cosmos Marketing; Time Technology
Patent(s): 5,896,348 - Method and timepiece for displaying time using grouped binary indicators
                 D554004 - Watch

52. Walker Digital LLC v. 2K Sports et. al.
Case: 1:11-cv-00649 filed on 7/22/2011 in District of Delaware
Plaintiff(s): Walker Digital LLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): Bayard, P.A.
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Stephen B. Brauerman; Richard D. Kirk
Defendant(s): 2K Sports; Rockstar Games; 2K Games; Take-Two Interactive Software
Patent(s): 6,425,828 - Database driven online distributed tournament system
                 6,224,486 - Database driven online distributed tournament system

53. Silicon Storage Technology et. al. v. United Module et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00332 filed on 7/22/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Silicon Storage Technology; Microchip Technology; Freescale Semiconductor
Plaintiff law firm(s): King & Spalding LLP; Jones Day
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Brian Christopher Banner; Truman Haymaker Fenton; Lisa Kobialka; Jeffrey David Mills; Bruce W. Slayden; David L. Witcoff
Defendant(s): United Module; Keranos
Patent(s): 5,042,009 - Method for programming a floating gate memory device
                 4,795,719 - Self-aligned split gate eprom process
                 4,868,629 - Self-aligned split gate EPROM

54. National Semiconductor et. al. v. Keranos et. al.
Case: 2:11-cv-00334 filed on 7/22/2011 in Eastern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): National Semiconductor; Analog Devices; Freescale Semiconductor
Plaintiff law firm(s): Jones Day; King & Spalding LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Truman Haymaker Fenton; Lisa Kobialka; David L. Witcoff
Defendant(s): Keranos; United Module
Defendant law firm(s): Agility IP Law
Defendant lawyer(s): David A. Caine; Thomas T. Carmack; Monica Mucchetti Eno; Xiang Long; Theresa Elise Norton; James C. Otteson
Patent(s): 5,042,009 - Method for programming a floating gate memory device
                 4,795,719 - Self-aligned split gate eprom process
                 4,868,629 - Self-aligned split gate EPROM

55. Downhole Products PLC v. Top-Co LP
Case: 4:11-cv-02714 filed on 7/22/2011 in Southern District of Texas
Plaintiff(s): Downhole Products PLC
Plaintiff law firm(s): King Spalding LLP
Plaintiff lawyer(s): Julie A. McWhirter
Defendant(s): Top-Co LP
Patent(s): 6435275 - Casing centralizer