Phigenix Company IP News and Updates

Standing Dispute Highlights 315(e)(2) Estoppel Concern Article III standing has been a problem for certain petitioners seeking review of adverse...

2017: A Year of CAFC Feedback & Agency Refocus With so much attention being paid to Oil States, it was...

Written by Jordan M. Cox and Nathanael Luman, Ph.D. The Federal Circuit determined that Article III standing was not necessary...

USPTO Explains Intervenor Standing Some weeks back in Knowles Electronics v. Matal, the Federal Circuit, sua sponte, asked the following...

Last month, the Federal Circuit made clear that Article III standing is necessary for petitioners to appeal from adverse decisions...

Burden of Production on Article III Standing to Bolster 315(b) Disputes at CAFC? Two weeks back, the Federal Circuit made...